arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.19961

Taming the Online Software Engineering Tongue: Detecting and Reducing Offensive Language in Software Communities

Abstract

Online Software Engineering (SE) communities such as Stack Overflow have become unwelcoming and hostile spaces, as evidenced by the presence of rude and offensive comments that are detrimental to the emotional wellbeing of participants. The main objective of this work is to investigate the prevalence and nature of offensive language in online SE communities, and develop approaches to classify them with the ultimate goal of reducing offensive language by proposing an Offensive Language Reduction System (OLRSSE) that has the ability to detect, classify, and explain to the poster why a comment is offensive and also propose non-offensive alternative suggestions. Using data from 130,000 user comments on discussions held in four prominent SE platforms: Stack Overflow, GitHub, Gitter and Slack, we developed six sets of twelve (72 in total) different machine learning models (both traditional and deep learning). The F1-Score of the best performing models in the system ranges from 0.56 to 0.94, with an average F1-Score of 0.85, predominantly using BERT as the primary model for various classification tasks. Also, two language-based models were developed for paraphrasing offensive to non-offensive comments. The overall utility of the OLRS-SE was evaluated using user studies with 30 participants, which showed that the developed system is easy to use and also effective in reducing offensive language. Investigating the capabilities of different large language models for offensive language reduction is a promising avenue for future research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jithin Cheriyan, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Stephen Cranefield. 2026-10-14. Taming the Online Software Engineering Tongue: Detecting and Reducing Offensive Language in Software Communities. https://doi.org/10.17706/jsw.21.2.45-77

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Securing High-Concurrency Ticket Sales: A Framework Based on Microservice

The railway ticketing system is one of the most important public service infrastructure. In peak periods such as holidays, it is often faced with the challenge of high concurrency scenarios because of a large number of users accessing at the same time. The traditional aggregation architecture can not meet the peak user requirements because of its insufficient fault tolerance and low ability. Therefore, the system needs to use microservice architecture for development, and add multiple security methods to ensure that the system can have good stability and data consistency under high concurrency scenarios, and can respond quickly to user requests. This paper introduces the use of B/S architecture and Spring Cloud to design and develop a railway ticket purchase system that can maintain stability and reliability under high concurrency scenarios, and formulate multiple security design methods for the system. This system integrates a range of functions, such as real-time train inquiries, dynamic seat updates, online seat selection, and ticket purchasing, effectively addressing common problems associated with offline ticket purchasing, such as long queues and delayed information. It enables a complete online process from inquiry and booking to payment and refunds. Furthermore, the "add passenger" function allows users to purchase tickets for others, extending the convenience of online ticketing to people with limited internet access. The system design prioritizes security and stability, while also focusing on high performance, and achieves these goals through a carefully designed architecture and the integration of multiple middleware components. After the completion of the system development, the core interface of the system is tested, and then the results are analyzed. The test data proves that the system has good ability and stability under high concurrency.

cs.SE↗

Terminal Agents Suffice for Enterprise Automation

There has been growing interest in building agents that can interact with digital platforms to execute meaningful enterprise tasks autonomously. Among the approaches explored are tool-augmented agents built on abstractions such as Model Context Protocol (MCP) and web agents that operate through graphical interfaces. Yet, it remains unclear whether such complex agentic systems are necessary given their cost and operational overhead. We argue that a coding agent equipped only with a terminal and a filesystem can solve many enterprise tasks more effectively by interacting directly with platform APIs. We evaluate this hypothesis across diverse real-world systems and show that these low-level terminal agents match or outperform more complex agent architectures at a fraction of the cost. Our findings suggest that simple, flexible programmatic interfaces combined with strong foundation models should be the backbone of enterprise automation.

cs.SE↗

T2J-BENCH: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Execution-Grounded PyTorch-to-JAX Repository Migration

Migrating a machine-learning codebase across frameworks--for example from PyTorch to JAX--is a routine but costly engineering task that is fundamentally cross-paradigm: eager, stateful, object-oriented modules must be rewritten as pure, jittable functions over an explicit parameter pytree. We ask whether coding agents can perform such whole-repository migrations correctly, and argue that existing code benchmarks, which grade unit-test pass rates or surface-level similarity to a reference translation, cannot answer this: they neither require the migrated system to \emph{behave} the same nor prevent a JAX reimplementation from faking equivalence by secretly importing PyTorch itself. We introduce T2J-BENCH, a benchmark of 63 whole-repository PyTorch-to-JAX migration tasks spanning 18 model families across both training and serving, where torch-free checkpoint conversion is itself part of the deliverable. T2J-BENCH grades execution-grounded functional equivalence: each candidate is run inside a separate, torch-free, offline verifier and scored against references frozen from the PyTorch original, under a hard independence gate and a continuous, threshold-free reward. Across twenty off-the-shelf agent--model configurations, the strongest recovers only 0.676 of the reward against a 0.980 oracle, with substantial numeric and behavioral divergence despite high spec pass rates. Finally, we contribute TWINHARNESS, a reference-grounded agent harness that turns the agent's executable PyTorch source into legitimate self-verification feedback; applied to an opus-5 agent it raises the reward from 0.649 to 0.723--the highest of any configuration--using only task-visible resources.

cs.SE↗