What Matters for World Modeling in Vision-Language-Action Models?

Qisen Ma; Yixiang Chen; Yuan Xu; Peiyan Li; Jiabing Yang; Kai Wang; Jianhua Yang; Jianlou Si; Jun Huang; Jing Liu; Nianfeng Liu; Yan Huang; Liang Wang

arXiv · 2610.19825

What Matters for World Modeling in Vision-Language-Action Models?

Qisen Ma·Yixiang Chen·Yuan Xu·Peiyan Li·Jiabing Yang·Kai Wang·Jianhua Yang·Jianlou Si·Jun Huang·Jing Liu·Nianfeng Liu·Yan Huang·Liang Wang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Integrating world models into Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) has emerged as a promising direction, enabling policies to anticipate future dynamics beyond reactive observation-to-action mapping. However, existing approaches vary simultaneously in their world representations, integration paradigms, and policy backbones, making it difficult to determine what truly matters for effective world model integration. To disentangle these factors, we categorize existing efforts into four representative paradigms, namely Implicit Future Alignment, Explicit Future Query, MoT Future Expert, and External World Predictor. We instantiate each within a unified framework and systematically evaluate these paradigms with diverse world representations and policy backbones across in-domain, out-of-domain, long-horizon, dynamic, few-shot, and real-world settings. Our study yields four main findings: 1) world representation effectiveness is paradigm-dependent, whereas 2D semantic representations offer robust, cross-paradigm gains; 2) no single paradigm is universally optimal, yet the decoupled MoT Future Expert offers competitive overall performance, particularly in OOD robustness; 3) world modeling consistently benefits policies built on standard VLMs, while decoupled designs exhibit greater compatibility with pretrained VLAs; and 4) world modeling improves performance over action-only baselines across multiple settings, with notable gains on long-horizon and dynamic tasks. Project page and video demonstrations are available at https://dylanmqs.github.io/WM-in-VLAs/.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Qisen Ma, Yixiang Chen, Yuan Xu, Peiyan Li, Jiabing Yang, Kai Wang, Jianhua Yang, Jianlou Si, Jun Huang, Jing Liu, Nianfeng Liu, Yan Huang, Liang Wang. 2026-10-14. What Matters for World Modeling in Vision-Language-Action Models?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19825

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Active Exploration in Bayesian Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Robot Manipulation

Efficiently tackling multiple tasks within complex environments, such as those found in robot manipulation, remains an ongoing challenge in robotics and an opportunity for data-driven solutions such as reinforcement learning (RL). The high cost of data gathering in robotics encourages data-efficient approaches such as model-based RL, which builds a dynamic model of the robot to conduct most policy learning on cheaper simulations, while enabling data reuse and transfer between tasks. In this work, we employ Bayesian deep learning (BDL) with a double purpose. First, we increase the model quality by improving its calibration. Second, we improve data efficiency by performing active learning of the dynamic model during a preliminary exploration phase, actively estimating the information gain of each transition and using it as the exploration reward. We compare several BDL methods in a realistic robot manipulation setup. Our experiments show that our approach matches the quality of relevant alternatives with much lower robot execution requirements and, unlike previous studies validated only on standard RL environments, we tackle robotic arm end-tasks on a complete manipulator simulator such as \texttt{CoppeliaSim}. Code is available at https://github.com/ropertunizar/BayesianActiveExploration.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Don't Run with Scissors: Pruning Breaks VLA Models but They Can Be Recovered

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are a promising paradigm for field robotics, but their deployment is bottlenecked by strict edge SWaP-C constraints. Compression techniques such as quantization, distillation, and pruning are well-established for LLMs and VLMs. Pruning, however, remains particularly underexplored for VLA models. We surprisingly find that pruning VLA models yields drastic performance degradation and increased safety violations. Through spectral analysis, we identify structural properties of VLA weights that help explain this fragility. Based on this insight, we introduce GLUESTICK, a post-pruning recovery method that restores much of the original model's capability while preserving sparsity benefits. GLUESTICK computes a one-time corrective term by interpolating between the dense and pruned models in weight space. At inference, each pruned layer applies this correction to recover lost performance with minimal overhead. Our approach requires no additional training and is agnostic to the pruning algorithm. Across diverse VLA architectures and domains, GLUESTICK recovers up to 100% of the success rate and restores safety to near-dense levels, while saving up to 5 GB of memory and achieving up to 1.75x speedup. Additional material can be found at: https://gluestick-vla.github.io/

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Schrödinger's Navigator: Imagining an Ensemble of Futures for Zero-Shot Object Navigation

Zero-shot object navigation (ZSON) requires robots to find target objects in unseen environments without task-specific fine-tuning or pre-built maps, a key capability for general-purpose service robots. Yet methods that perform well in simulation often degrade in cluttered real-world scenes with severe occlusion and latent hazards, where large unseen regions make single-scene inference brittle and unsafe. We propose Schrödinger's Navigator, a belief-aware framework that reasons at inference time over multiple trajectory-conditioned imagined 3D futures. Given candidate paths, a trajectory-conditioned 3D world model predicts hypothetical observations and maintains a superposition of plausible scene realizations rather than committing to one map. An adaptive occluder-aware sampler directs imagination to uncertainty-critical regions, while a Future-Aware Value Map (FAVM) aggregates imagined futures for robust, proactive action selection. Experiments in simulation and on a physical Go2 quadruped show that Schrödinger's Navigator outperforms strong ZSON baselines, improving hidden-target discovery and risk-aware waypoint selection in occlusion-heavy navigation scenarios. These results highlight imagined 3D futures as a scalable and generalizable strategy for zero-shot navigation in uncertain real-world environments.

cs.RO↗