arXiv · 2610.19811
Calibration and Risk-Budgeted Decisions with System One Models
Abstract
LLM workflows and agents rely on a set of binary decisions like allow/block an input, or discard/retain a retrieved document. When human deferral is unavailable, uncertain cases must still receive an action. We study System One decision scores in this setting by defaulting to a conservative fallback when uncertain, and controlling the false omission risk within the subset of inputs assigned the utility-maximizing action. Across six datasets covering moderation, safety, and reranking, we compare general System One models with task baselines and a local open-weights fine-tuned System One model. We show that naive baselines for threshold selection exceed the target risk in roughly half of settings with defined test risk, compared with 7.8\% for Learn Then Test (LTT), which leverages finite-sample statistical guarantees. Our results show why relying on a probability-like interface is insufficient for deployment decisions and how risk-budgeted selection trades useful action against observed error.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Soundouss Messoudi, Youness Mansar. 2026-10-14. Calibration and Risk-Budgeted Decisions with System One Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19811
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.