arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.19747

Generalized Odds for Ordinal Outcomes: A Causal Inference Framework Adjusting for Covariates

Runnian Huang·Dandan Shi·Lan Liu·Yunjian Yin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Background: Generalized Odds (Gen Odds) provide summaries for ordinal outcomes without requiring the proportional odds assumption. However, conventional Gen Odds compares independently drawn treatment and control outcomes and targets a population-level contrast rather than an individual-level contrast. We developed an individual-level causal formulation of Gen Odds and examined its identification. Methods: We defined the Causal Gen Odds using the joint distribution of potential outcomes and identified it under conditional independence of the potential outcomes given baseline covariates. We developed a model-based estimator using nonproportional cumulative logistic regression and introduced an odds-ratio sensitivity parameter to assess departures from conditional independence. We evaluated the estimators through simulations and illustrated them using data from the ACCORD Study. Results: In simulations, the conditional-independence estimator was approximately unbiased with 95.5% confidence interval coverage under conditional independence, but bias and undercoverage increased with residual dependence. When the sensitivity-analysis estimator incorporated the data-generating dependence parameter, bias remained below 0.01 and coverage ranged from 93.7% to 96.1% across examined settings. In the ACCORD Study, the Causal Gen Odds for right-foot pre-tibial edema was 0.909 (95% CI: 0.880 to 0.940) under conditional independence and remained stable across the examined sensitivity range. Conclusions: The Causal Gen Odds provides an individual-level estimand that complements the conventional population-level Gen Odds. This framework enables estimation of this contrast while explicitly assessing its robustness to assumptions about dependence between potential outcomes.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Runnian Huang, Dandan Shi, Lan Liu, Yunjian Yin. 2026-10-14. Generalized Odds for Ordinal Outcomes: A Causal Inference Framework Adjusting for Covariates. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19747

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Principal stratification with continuous treatments and continuous post-treatment variables

Principal stratification (PS) is a commonly used approach for understanding the mechanisms through which a treatment affects an outcome. The goal of this work is to extend the PS framework to studies with continuous treatments, which introduces a number of both challenges and opportunities in terms of defining causal effects and performing inference. This manuscript provides multiple key methodological contributions: 1) we introduce principal causal estimands for continuous treatments that provide insights into different causal mechanisms, 2) we show that nonparametric identification is possible under a principal ignorability assumption, but only under a restrictive assumption on the joint distribution of potential mediators, which can be dropped under certain parametric assumptions, 3) we utilize nonparametric Bayesian models for the joint distribution of the potential mediating variables to mitigate issues from model misspecification, and 4) we provide theoretical justification for utilizing an outcome model to identify the joint distribution of the potential mediating variables, and show that this is only possible if a principal ignorability assumption is violated. Lastly, we illustrate our methodology by applying it to a novel study of the relationship between the economy and arrest rates, and how this is potentially mediated by police capacity.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Controlling the false discovery rate in high-dimensional linear models using model-X knockoffs and $p$-values

We propose a novel multiple testing methodology for controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) in high-dimensional linear models that integrates model-X knockoff techniques with debiased penalized regression estimators. At the foundation of our methodology, we construct and study two sets of naturally paired high-dimensional test statistics and the associated $p$-values for evaluating the same null hypotheses. The first set is shown to be asymptotically mutually independent, justifying the use of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. We further exploit the pairing structure through a two-step procedure aimed at improving power. Our theoretical results establish the key properties of the framework with respect to asymptotic FDR control and formally characterize the associated power gains of the two-step procedure. Importantly, our framework accommodates general dependence in the design matrix. Extensive simulations demonstrate that our methods outperform existing approaches -- particularly those relying on empirical FDP estimates -- in both power and FDR control accuracy, with notable gains in settings involving weaker signals, small sample sizes, or low target FDR levels.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Measuring frailty in the elderly: an indicator based on a super-classifier

Identifying frail older adults in an ageing population is essential for improving healthcare services. This study proposes a composite indicator to assess individual frailty levels using administrative healthcare data. Given the complex and multidimensional nature of frailty, a multi-outcome approach is adopted. Following an extensive literature review, a set of adverse health events is selected as proxies for frailty. These events were modelled using logistic classifiers, with frailty determinants (associated to adverse health events, selected using a gradient tree boosting) serving as covariates. The sensitivity and specificity of each classifier is used to compose their combined likelihood. From this, we derive an indicator capable of quantifying frailty across the population. The indicator shows robust performance across multiple outcomes and over time. Its primary innovation lies in allowing the use of diverse and outcome-specific sets of frailty determinants without any structural constraint. Overall, we offer an effective tool for quantifying frailty among older adults, potentially supporting health authorities in the prevention of frailty-related adverse events.

stat.ME↗