arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.19085

Blaschke--Santaló inequalities with respect to costs

Alexander V. Kolesnikov·Galyna V. Livshyts·Liran Rotem
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study functional Blaschke--Santaló inequalities in which the inner product is replaced by a cost. An inequality on each orthant, combined with Steiner symmetrization, gives a sufficient condition for a cost inequality to hold for even convex functions. We apply this principle to a multiplicative cost defined on all orthants. Its second variation gives a weighted improvement of the Brascamp--Lieb inequality in the directions for which differentiation is justified. We also prove an $L^p$ version of the Fradelizi--Meyer theorem from a weighted volume-product inequality and derive the corresponding radial cost and Brascamp--Lieb inequalities. Explicit examples include anisotropic power and Cauchy densities, with dilation equality cases and a sharp obstruction below the coordinate exponent two. For the spherical logarithmic cost we compute an exact entropy--logdet deficit decomposition and the second-order deficit transverse to ellipsoids. We also explain the transport-entropy formulation and distinguish the restricted spectral question from the scalar $(B)$ property.

Explore related subjects

math.MGmath.FA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexander V. Kolesnikov, Galyna V. Livshyts, Liran Rotem. 2026-10-13. Blaschke--Santaló inequalities with respect to costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19085

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Spherical Hadwiger Theorem

We prove the spherical Hadwiger theorem in every dimension: for $n\geq1$, every continuous $\mathrm{SO}(n+1)$-invariant valuation on all closed spherical convex sets in the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^n$ is a unique linear combination of the spherical intrinsic volumes $V_0,\ldots,V_n$. The same classification holds on sets contained in an open hemisphere, with unique continuous invariant extension to the full domain. We first classify simple invariant valuations by an independent induction on dimension. Averaging a signed cone identity gives the spherical volume term; the remaining terms are signed coning transforms that vanish by the lower-dimensional simple classification. A second induction, together with extension to non-proper sets, gives the general classification. The cone--sphere correspondence yields, for $d\geq2$, the corresponding classification on all closed convex cones in $\mathbb{R}^d$, without normalization at the zero cone. In both settings, $\mathrm{SO}$-invariance implies $\mathrm{O}$-invariance.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

Infinitesimally Euclidean metric surfaces

We prove the equivalence of several notions of infinitesimally Euclidean-like behaviour for metric surfaces appearing in the literature. We obtain in particular that metric surfaces with property (ET) are universally infinitesimally Hilbertian.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

Tiling a triangle into a prime number of congruent triangles

We prove that if a triangle is cut into $N$ congruent triangles and $N$ is prime, then $N=2$, $N=3$, or $N\equiv 1 \pmod 4$, and every such $N$ occurs. In particular, if $N > 3$ then $N$ is not a prime congruent to $3$ modulo $4$. The argument divides into cases according to possible shapes of the tiled triangle. Let $α,β,γ$ be the angles of the tile. Prior to this posting, there remained several open shapes. The two most difficult shapes were $(2α,β,α+β)$, the {\em triquadratic} shape, and $(β,β,3α)$, the {\em isosceles-$β$} shape, in which $3α+2β= π$ and $α$ is not a rational multiple of $π$. A previous version of this paper relied on incorrect proofs of those cases, which have been retracted, and are replaced here by correct proofs. For each of those two shapes the number of tiles has the form $N = j^2 N_0$, where $N_0 > 1$ is determined by the shape of the tile and $j$ is a positive integer; so $N$ is prime, or even squarefree, only if $j = 1$. We prove by geometric reasoning that neither shape admits a tiling with $j = 1$, which shows that for both shapes $N$ is never prime, and indeed never squarefree. The shape $(β,β,3α+β)$ (where $3α+ 3β= π$) has been settled by Bonfioli. In this paper, we settle the remaining cases, by number-theoretic arguments based on the area equation. Those proofs rule out $N$ prime, but not $N$ squarefree, and we give examples to show that tilings with squarefree $N$ do sometimes exist.

math.MG↗