arXiv · 2610.18011
Correcting or Continuing? What On-Policy Distillation Learns from Student Errors
Abstract
On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own rollouts under a frozen teacher, mitigating the distribution mismatch of off-policy supervision. While prior work has primarily trained on problems a student can largely solve, we ask whether OPD can improve a student when training is restricted to problems it currently fails. We evaluate five representative OPD mechanisms with Qwen-3 and Phi-4 models under a unified competition-mathematics protocol. We find that OPD does not improve accuracy on this hard subset, with most mechanisms instead degrading performance despite continued decreases in training KL divergence. All eight configurations show a decline, and the two-sided sign test gives p=0.0078. In contrast, the same pipeline improves accuracy by 4.6 percentage points when training is not concentrated on failures, showing that the failure is conditional on the training regime rather than systematic. These findings suggest that OPD is effective when supervision is dominated by correct student prefixes, but can reinforce existing errors when training is concentrated on problems the student currently fails.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Shuo Yang, Zheyu Zhang, Mahito Sugiyama, Gjergji Kasneci. 2026-10-13. Correcting or Continuing? What On-Policy Distillation Learns from Student Errors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18011
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.