arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.16939

Foundations for a Lens of Quantum Governance

Shira K. Huizing Lemstra·Tzula B. Propp
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The second quantum revolution is a revolution of information. Advances in quantum computation, communication, and sensing offer new capabilities while raising questions about how quantum infrastructures will be organised, accessed, and governed. We argue that their significance for governance lies not in transforming political principles, but in how their technical and infrastructural requirements may affect existing relationships of authority, responsibility, legitimacy, and power. This paper develops a quantum governance lens that connects governance scholarship with quantum information science, examining interactions between technical design, institutional arrangements, and infrastructural dependencies. We apply this lens to five areas: quantum computation, quantum key distribution, Quantum Byzantine Agreement, blind quantum computation, and dual-use quantum sensing. These applications illustrate how technical capabilities may influence access, trust, privacy, oversight, and accountability, while demonstrating that technical guarantees cannot resolve institutional questions independently. We conclude that quantum technologies do not necessarily introduce unique governance challenges or require entirely new governance frameworks. Rather, they provide a context in which established questions of legitimacy, accountability, and equity must be reconsidered in relation to emerging technological capabilities and institutional choices.

Explore related subjects

physics.soc-phquant-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shira K. Huizing Lemstra, Tzula B. Propp. 2026-10-12. Foundations for a Lens of Quantum Governance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16939

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

An Approximate-Master-Equation Formulation of the Watts Threshold Model on Hypergraphs

In traditional models of behavioral and opinion dynamics on networks, researchers suppose that interactions occur between pairs of individuals. However, in reality, social interactions also occur in sets of three or more individuals. A common way to incorporate such polyadic interactions is to study dynamical processes on hypergraphs, in which interactions can occur between any number of the individuals. A major current effort is to generalize popular dynamical processes from graphs to hypergraphs. One important model is the Watts threshold model (WTM), which describes a simplistic social spreading process and was extended recently by Chen et al. from dyadic networks (i.e., ordinary graphs) to polyadic networks (i.e., hypergraphs). In the present paper, we extend their discrete-time model to continuous time by using approximate master equations (AMEs). By employing AMEs, we are able to very accurately model the mean behavior of the continuous-time system. We reduce the high-dimensional AME system to a system of three coupled ordinary differential equations without any detectable loss of accuracy. This much lower-dimensional system is computationally faster to solve numerically, and it is also easier to interpret. We linearize the reduced AME system and derive a cascade condition, which allows us to determine when a large spreading event occurs. We then examine our reduced AME system on a contact hypergraph of a French primary school and on a hypergraph of computer-science coauthorships. We find that our full and reduced AME systems give reasonably good descriptions of the mean time-dependent fraction of active nodes in the polyadic WTM dynamics on these empirical networks.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

From risk to flourishing: Seeds for responding to a complex world

Complex risk arises when interacting hazards, infrastructures, ecological systems, institutions, and human behaviors produce nonlinear impacts that cannot be inferred from any component in isolation. We call the study of these dynamics complex risk science. Flourishing is the actualization of all beings toward their good--individually and collectively--answering the question of `how do we live well with and for each other?'. In science as in society, the tendency to reduce, segregate, specialize, and settle has precluded embracing the concept of flourishing as a guiding principle. We describe how complex risk science reframes risk science research so that it can promote the flourishing of socio-ecological-technological systems, and explore how its practice may point society toward a more flourishing future. Our exploration mirrors the unsettled and searching nature of flourishing: examine ideologies traditionally believed to be rigidly in opposition and consider what emerges in the space(s) and conversation between them. We call this a dialectical approach: not a means of resolving contradiction, but a practice of sustaining it, so that systems, and our understanding of them, remain capable of reframing as conditions change. Within this dialectical paradigm, we revisit longstanding tensions in risk science: physical|social, determinism|uncertainty, and contextuality|generality. Examining the conversation among these tensions reveals five seeds that are dispositions for practicing complex risk science: interdependence, responsivity, participation, pluralism, and ongoingness. They can support any scientific endeavor to embrace complexity and promote flourishing. Practicing these seeds at scale will depend on institutional reform: creating collectives toward complex risk science, supporting them with skillfully governed commons, and centering care in our research and evaluation.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

Collective Benefits and Efficiency in Coupled Echo State Networks

Simple aggregation of independent responses ("wisdom of crowds") generally improves collective performance through statistical facilitation, but interaction among members can sometimes hinder group outcomes. However, under certain circumstances, coordination studies show that interacting groups can outperform their individual members and nominal groups, and interaction can also be more efficient than independence. We present a reservoir computing model to investigate how interaction can enhance joint performance in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Echo state networks were trained independently to identify Japanese speakers from vowel recordings and tested jointly with and without coupled feedback. Model pairs reproduced the dyadic advantage reported by Bahrami et al. (2010) with interaction via pooled-feedback, but not when independent responses were aggregated together. Model dynamics revealed that interaction was beneficial whereas aggregated outputs were prone to diverging from runaway feedback over time. In terms of efficiency, larger groups of smaller interacting models outperformed smaller groups of larger models while equating for total amount of group computation. Our results offer a formal framework for explaining when and why interaction enhances collective intelligence.

physics.soc-ph↗