arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.16703

Piercing boxes and products of trees

Abstract

We give a new upper bound on the piercing number $τ(\mathcal{F})$ of a finite family $\mathcal{F}$ of axis-parallel rectangles in the plane when every $p$ members contain an intersecting pair. Namely, we prove $τ(\mathcal{F}) = O(p(\log\log p)(\log\log\log p))$, improving the factor $(\log\log p)^2$ in the best previously known bound to $(\log\log p)(\log\log\log p)$. For each $d>2$, when $\mathcal{F}$ is a finite family of axis-parallel boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$, this yields $τ(\mathcal{F}) = O(p(\log p)^{d-2}(\log\log p)(\log\log\log p))$. We also study an analogous problem replacing $\mathbb{R}^d=\mathbb{R}\times\cdots\times\mathbb{R}$ with the Cartesian product $T_1\square\cdots\square T_d$ of trees $T_1,\ldots,T_d$, and boxes with objects of the form $S_1\square\cdots\square S_d$ where $S_i$ is a subtree of $T_i$. For a finite family of such objects under the same intersection assumption as above, we establish an upper bound $τ(\mathcal{F})=O(p(\log p)^{d-1})$ for each $d$. We also construct examples showing that this upper bound cannot be improved in order of magnitude.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wei Rao, Taehyun Eom, Minki Kim. 2026-10-12. Piercing boxes and products of trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16703

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Monochromatic non-commuting products

We show that a finite coloring of an amenable group contains `many' monochromatic sets of the form $\{x,y,xy,yx\},$ and natural extensions with more variables. This gives the first combinatorial proof and extensions of Bergelson and McCutcheon's non-commutative Schur theorem. Our main new tool is the introduction of what we call `quasirandom colorings,' a condition that is automatically satisfied by colorings of quasirandom groups, and a reduction to this case.

math.CO↗

Complete tripartite subgraphs of balanced tripartite graphs with large minimum degree

In 1975 Bollobás, Erdős, and Szemerédi asked what minimum degree guarantees an octahedral subgraph $K_3(2)$ in any tripartite graph $G$ with $n$ vertices in each vertex class. We show that $δ(G)\geq n+2n^{\frac{5}{6}}$ suffices thus improving the bound $n+(1+o(1))n^{\frac{11}{12}}$ of Bhalkikar and Zhao obtained by following their approach. Bollobás, Erdős, and Szemerédi conjectured that $n+cn^{\frac{1}{2}}$ suffices and there are many $K_3(2)$-free tripartite graphs $G$ with $δ(G)\geq n+cn^{\frac{1}{2}}$. We confirm this conjecture under the additional assumption that every vertex in $G$ is adjacent to at least $(1/5+\varepsilon)n$ vertices in any other vertex class.

math.CO↗

Almost-full transversals in equi-$n$-squares

In 1975, Stein made a wide generalisation of the Ryser-Brualdi-Stein conjecture on transversals in Latin squares, conjecturing that every equi-$n$-square (an $n\times n$ array filled with $n$ symbols where each symbol appears exactly $n$ times) has a transversal of size $n-1$. That is, it should have a collection of $n-1$ entries that share no row, column, or symbol. In 2017, Aharoni, Berger, Kotlar, and Ziv showed that equi-$n$-squares always have a transversal with size at least $2n/3$. In 2019, Pokrovskiy and Sudakov disproved Stein's conjecture by constructing equi-$n$-squares without a transversal of size $n-\frac{\log n}{42}$, but asked whether Stein's conjecture is approximately true. I.e., does an equi-$n$-square always have a transversal with size $(1-o(1))n$? We answer this question in the positive. More specifically, we improve both known bounds, showing that there exist equi-$n$-squares with no transversal of size $n-Ω(\sqrt{n})$ and that every equi-$n$-square contains $n-n^{1-Ω(1)}$ disjoint transversals of size $n-n^{1-Ω(1)}$. Furthermore, we give results for the corresponding problem in globally-bounded colourings of complete graphs, as part of the wider framework of coloured complete directed graphs.

math.CO↗