Sensitivity of calibration-free DESI DR2 BAO--supernova constraints to a distance-duality tilt

Abstract

Recent measurements from DESI baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) have reported a moderate preference for dynamical dark energy, challenging the standard $Λ$CDM paradigm. Nonetheless, such a trend could reflect a tension between the shape and the offset of the Hubble diagrams predicted by current BAO and Type Ia supernovae (SN) data, which may underpin a possible breakdown of the cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR) linking luminosity distances $D_{\rm L}$ and angular-diameter distances $D_{\rm A}$. We explore this possibility by parametrizing deviations from this relation as $η(z) \equiv D_{\rm L} / [{(1+z)}^2 D_{\rm A}] = α{(1+z)}^\varepsilon$, and investigate how the preference for a Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) dynamical dark energy is modified once $\varepsilon \!\neq\! 0$ is allowed. Using DESI DR2 and uncalibrated SN data (Pantheon$+$, DES-Dovekie, Union3, and Union3.1), we find that allowing $\varepsilon$ to vary freely in both $Λ$CDM and CPL reduces the CPL preference with respect to $Λ$CDM by a larger amount than the addition of spatial curvature $Ω_k$; only Union3.1 exhibits comparable reductions. We also find that the preference reduction is robust to alternative $η(z)$ parametrizations, and that the $η(z)$ constraints remain stable under the removal of BAO tracers or low-redshift cutoffs for Pantheon$+$, whereas the DES-Dovekie preference largely disappears once $z < 0.1$ SN are removed. In a separate calibrated analysis, illustrative Planck sound-horizon and SH0ES absolute-magnitude priors give $α\simeq 0.942 \pm 0.014$, quantifying the normalization mismatch under those assumptions. We also map the CDDR violation onto photon-loss and varying-$G$ scenarios, concluding that the cosmological constraints are much weaker than existing constraints on these physical mechanisms.