arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.16410

What UI Design Can Do For "Good" Oversight Work: A Three-Month Action Research Study

Cedric Faas·Lisa Dargasz·Julius Gabelmann·Felix Jahn·Markus Langer·Kevin Baum·Anna Maria Feit
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

With AI automating consequential tasks, human oversight is required for ethical, legal, and practical reasons. Yet these oversight tasks can be demanding and often make for poor work. Empirical evidence on overseers' lived work experiences remains underexplored, yet critical for designing ``good'' oversight. We provide longitudinal, in-the-wild insights through action research accompanying (N=8) tutors who oversaw an AI-supported learning assistant over three months. Our thematic analysis combines insights from twelve weekly meetings and two workshop iterations and was enriched by four repeated questionnaires. We identified stimulation, mastery, and relatedness as key challenges, stemming from the task's repetitiveness, unclear impact of interventions, and limited connections with students and peers. Informed by our initial findings, we deployed targeted UI modifications with mixed success. This paper documents the long-term evolution of the work characteristics of a real-world oversight task and discusses which oversight work characteristics can and cannot be supported by interface design.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cedric Faas, Lisa Dargasz, Julius Gabelmann, Felix Jahn, Markus Langer, Kevin Baum, Anna Maria Feit. 2026-10-12. What UI Design Can Do For "Good" Oversight Work: A Three-Month Action Research Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16410

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Co-Creative Learning via Metropolis-Hastings Interaction between Humans and AI

We propose co-creative learning as a novel paradigm where humans and AI, i.e., biological and artificial agents, mutually integrate their partial perceptual information and knowledge to construct shared external representations, a process we interpret as symbol emergence. Unlike traditional AI teaching based on unilateral knowledge transfer, this addresses the challenge of integrating information from inherently different modalities. We empirically test this framework using a human-AI interaction model based on the Metropolis-Hastings naming game (MHNG), a decentralized Bayesian inference mechanism. In an online experiment, 69 participants played a joint attention naming game (JA-NG) with one of three computer agent types (MH-based, always-accept, or always-reject) under partial observability. Results show that human-AI pairs with an MH-based agent significantly improved categorization accuracy through interaction and achieved stronger convergence toward a shared sign system. Furthermore, human acceptance behavior aligned closely with the MH-derived acceptance probability. These findings provide the first empirical evidence for co-creative learning emerging in human-AI dyads via MHNG-based interaction. This suggests a promising path toward symbiotic AI systems that learn with humans, rather than from them, by dynamically aligning perceptual experiences, opening a new venue for symbiotic AI alignment.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Interactive Mascot: A Scene-Centric Interaction Grammar for Data Visualizations

Scene-centric visualization systems expose semantic components, such as marks, encodings, layouts, and axes, as first-class objects that can be directly manipulated. Existing interaction abstractions, however, are largely based on event streams, signals, and data selections rather than semantic scene components. This mismatch makes interactions involving scene components less natural to specify and limits the expressive power of scene-centric visualization systems. We present Interactive Mascot, a scene-centric interaction grammar for data visualizations. Interactive Mascot extends scene-centric representations for static visualizations by modeling interactive behavior as information flow among four interaction components (trigger, responder, evaluator, and updater) and two forms of context (event context and state context). To realize these semantics, we introduce a dependency-graph execution model that systematically transforms interaction specifications into executable dependency graphs using reusable graph patterns associated with semantic visualization components. We implement Interactive Mascot in the JavaScript library Mascot$.$js and evaluate its performance and usability. Interactive Mascot achieves runtime performance comparable to Vega-Lite, and a qualitative user study shows that the grammar is learnable and usable for interaction authoring.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

RaivenTracks: Branching Provenance for Conversational Visualization Workflows

As AI agents increasingly participate in scientific workflows, scientists are shifting from direct authorship toward oversight, inspection, and steering. LLM-driven visualization systems are a promising interface for this hand-off, yet they remain largely stateless, forcing users to reconstruct context across refinements and offering little support for revisiting prior decisions or exploring alternatives. We present RaivenTracks, a workflow-aware extension of the Raiven DSL-mediated visualization pipeline that treats validated visualization specifications as persistent, branchable checkpoints. Because each checkpoint is a verifiable RaivenDSL specification rather than a dialogue transcript, restoring a node recompiles a known artifact rather than re-interpreting prior context. RaivenTracks contributes a two-level state management architecture that pairs a persistent, branchable version tree with a fine-grained undo/redo stack over runtime visualization settings, across both InfoVis and SciVis backends. A formative pilot study with three visualization researchers shows early promise, with all participants adopting the version tree for branching and recovery, and surfaces design directions for tree navigation, node labeling, and scalability that inform a planned controlled comparison against Raiven without version history. We frame branchable conversational visualization history as a step toward provenance support for future scientist-in-the-loop oversight of AI-driven scientific workflows.

cs.HC↗