arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.16020

When Does Compensating Inherited Quantization Error Help? Mean-Square Guarantees for Layer-Wise Quantization and Their Limits

Tianhao Guo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Layer-wise post-training quantization methods let each layer compensate for the quantization error inherited from earlier layers. We ask under what assumptions such compensation guarantees a network output error no larger than without it. For linear networks of any depth, with the required calibration Gram matrices invertible, if the rounding error of each layer has zero conditional mean and a deterministic second-moment map common to both schemes, as under subtractive dither on an unbounded grid, then compensation with strengths in $[0,1]$ fixed in advance gives a mean-square output error no larger than no compensation, each scheme being followed along its own trajectory. The exact gain separates error removed directly from reduced excitation of later rounding noise. Outside this setting the comparison can fail. With rectified linear activations it fails for two independent reasons: noise changes activation states, and, even when no state changes, the correction moves error from samples on which a unit is inactive to samples on which it is active. With stable activations, commutators between the calibration projection and the activation patterns bound the excess. With a bounded codebook, even unique exact layer-wise minimizers with no overload can give a larger output error. For fixed rounding errors it already fails for two scalar linear layers, refuting a published universal guarantee. An exact residual identity gives the necessary and sufficient condition on a common layer input. All these comparisons hold the calibration input fixed. On two 8B models at 4 bits, fixed half-strength compensation beat uncompensated rounding in every model, text and draw tested, yet no rule for choosing the strength beat a layer-wise rule consistently, and lowering the full-network loss on the data used to choose did not reliably lower it on new text.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AIcs.ITeess.SPmath.IT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tianhao Guo. 2026-10-12. When Does Compensating Inherited Quantization Error Help? Mean-Square Guarantees for Layer-Wise Quantization and Their Limits. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Model Predictive Task Sampling for Efficient and Robust Adaptation

Foundation models have revolutionized general-purpose problem-solving, offering rapid task adaptation through pretraining, meta-training, and finetuning. Recent crucial advances in these paradigms reveal the importance of challenging task prioritized sampling to enhance adaptation robustness under distribution shifts. However, ranking task difficulties over iteration as a preliminary step typically requires exhaustive task evaluation, which is practically unaffordable in computation and data-annotation. This study provides a novel perspective to illuminate the possibility of leveraging the dual importance of adaptation robustness and learning efficiency, particularly in scenarios where task evaluation is risky or costly, such as iterative agent-environment interactions for robotic policy evaluation or computationally intensive inference steps for finetuning foundation models. Firstly, we introduce Model Predictive Task Sampling (MPTS), a framework that bridges the task space and adaptation risk distributions, providing a theoretical foundation for robust active task sampling. MPTS employs a generative model to characterize the episodic optimization process and predicts task-specific adaptation risk via posterior inference. The resulting risk predictive model amortizes the costly evaluation of task adaptation performance and provably approximates task difficulty rankings. MPTS seamlessly integrates into zero-shot, few-shot, and supervised finetuning settings. Empirically, we conduct extensive experiments in pattern recognition using foundation models and sequential decision-making. Our results demonstrate that MPTS significantly enhances adaptation robustness for tail risk or out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks and improves learning efficiency compared to state-of-the-art (SoTA) methods. The code is available at the project site https://github.com/thu-rllab/MPTS.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Asynchronous Sharpness-Aware Minimization For Fast and Accurate Deep Learning

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) is an optimization method that improves the generalization performance of machine learning models. Despite its effectiveness, it has not been widely adopted in real-world applications due to its high computational cost. Existing approaches reduce this overhead by approximating or reusing gradients in the perturbation step, but still assume sequential perturbation and update steps. In this study, we introduce AsyncSAM, a variant of SAM that enables concurrent model perturbation and parameter updates across multiple compute resources. By adjusting the perturbation batch size in a system-aware manner, our asynchronous scheme fully overlaps perturbation with updates, eliminating the overhead and allowing even CPUs to perform perturbations without extra time. We also provide theoretical analysis showing that AsyncSAM achieves the same order of convergence as conventional SAM. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AsyncSAM delivers superior generalization performance and the highest training throughput among state-of-the-art SAM variants. For example, in ViT fine-tuning on CIFAR-100, it achieves accuracy comparable to SAM while maintaining training time nearly identical to SGD.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Weisfeiler and Leman Follow the Arrow of Time: Expressive Power of Message Passing in Temporal Event Graphs

An important characteristic of temporal graphs is how the directed arrow of time influences their causal topology, i.e., which nodes can possibly influence each other causally via time-respecting paths. The resulting patterns are often neglected by temporal graph neural networks (TGNNs). To formally analyze the expressive power of TGNNs, we lack a generalization of graph isomorphism to temporal graphs that fully captures their causal topology. Addressing this gap, we introduce the notion of consistent event graph isomorphism, which utilizes a time-unfolded representation of time-respecting paths in temporal graphs. We compare this definition with existing notions of temporal graph isomorphisms. We illustrate and highlight the advantages of our approach and develop a temporal generalization of the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm to heuristically distinguish non-isomorphic temporal graphs. Building on this theoretical foundation, we derive a novel message passing scheme for temporal graph neural networks that operates on the event graph representation of temporal graphs. An experimental evaluation shows that our approach performs well in a temporal graph classification experiment.

cs.LG↗