Assessing the impact of background subtraction on a dust-free corona

Abstract

Context. White-light observations of the solar corona contain contributions from both the electron-scattered K-corona and the dust-scattered F-corona. Because the diffuse F-corona dominates the measured intensity at altitudes of approximately 4 $R_{\odot}$ and above, background subtraction techniques are routinely employed to isolate the electron corona in coronagraph observations. Aims. Since no direct observational "ground truth" for the K-corona exists, the amount of coronal signal that is inadvertently removed by background subtraction methods remains unknown. We aim to quantify, for the first time, the impact of background subtraction on the inferred large-scale structure and brightness of the solar corona. Methods. We use a 32-day simulation based on a novel near-real-time, data-assimilative, time-evolving magnetohydrodynamic model to generate synthetic white-light observables. Because these synthetic observations are free from dust and instrumental stray-light contributions, they provide direct access to the "true" K-corona and enable a quantitative assessment of the effects of background subtraction. Results. We find that background subtraction generally preserves the large-scale morphology of the electron corona, including the locations and shapes of major coronal structures. However, the procedure systematically modifies the relative brightness of different features and removes a non-negligible fraction of the K-coronal signal. Conclusions. Although standard background subtraction techniques successfully recover the overall appearance of the electron corona, they can alter its quantitative photometric properties. These findings should be considered when interpreting coronal brightness measurements and deriving physical properties from processed white-light observations.