arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.15483

On the OpenAI proof that Landau-Siegel zeros do not exist

Abstract

A recent manuscript of OpenAI asserts that Landau-Siegel zeros do not exist. Here, we give a detailed account of its argument, arranged as a direct proof with explicit constants. There are absolute constants $q_0$ and $δ_0>0$ such that, for every primitive real Dirichlet character $χ$ of conductor $q\ge q_0$, every real zero $β\in(0,1)$ of $L(s,χ)$ satisfies $(1-β)\log q\geδ_0$, and one can take $q_0=10^{10}$ and $δ_0=3.0\times 10^{-3}$. Combined with a recent computation of Lu, Zaman, and Zhao, this result yields the bound $(1-β)\log q\ge 3.0\times 10^{-3}$ for every conductor $q\ge 3$. The proof is an interpolation determinant argument in the biquadratic field generated by $\sqrt{2}$ over the quadratic field attached to $χ$. A real zero close to one forces $χ(p)=-1$ for most primes $p$, and the Frobenius congruence at these primes makes a certain nonzero determinant divisible by higher powers of these primes than its Archimedean size allows. The underlying ideas are those of the OpenAI manuscript. The explicit constants, and the presentation, are new.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

William D. Banks. 2026-10-11. On the OpenAI proof that Landau-Siegel zeros do not exist. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15483

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Sporadic points on $X_0(N)$

We determine all integers $N$ for which the modular curve $X_0(N)$ admits a sporadic CM point (of any degree), as well as all $N$ for which $X_0(N)$ admits a sporadic point, whether CM or non-CM. In a sense, our results generalize the classification of isogenies of elliptic curves over $\Q$ due to Mazur and Kenku: their work determines the $X_0(N)$ with degree 1 sporadic points, whereas we classify all $X_0(N)$ that have a sporadic point of arbitrary degree.

math.NT↗

On the Number of Prime Factors of Consecutive Integers

We prove that there are infinitely many $n$ such that $ω(n+k) \ll \log k$ for all integers $k \ge 2$. This improves on a result of Tao and Teräväinen (2025), who have $O(k)$ in place of $O(\log k)$. As corollaries, we make progress on a number of questions posed by Erdős. The proof is based on a quantitative refinement of the Tao-Teräväinen probabilistic argument, combining a refined sieve construction with upper bounds for high moments and the resulting tail estimates. Moreover, we formulate a conjecture on integers with many prime factors based on Cramér-type random models. Assuming this conjecture, the main bound is essentially sharp.

math.NT↗