Homogeneity and heterogeneity of functional element composition of genome units across human and seven model organisms

Yanying Wu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.15182

Homogeneity and heterogeneity of functional element composition of genome units across human and seven model organisms

Yanying Wu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Is a chromosome a miniature of its genome, with the same mix of functional elements as the whole? We ask this of eight annotated genomes: human, mouse, zebrafish, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arabidopsis thaliana and maize. Elements are classified in a four-level hierarchy, from five major classes (protein-coding genes, ncRNA genes, transposable elements (TEs), pseudogenes, IG/TR gene segments) down to finer classes. Units are chromosomes or arms, cytogenetic bands, equal cuts of each chromosome, and random segments of matching size. We compare each unit with the genome and with other units, call compositions homogeneous when they differ by less than 5%, and score each against a random sample of the same size. The first finding is a surprising homogeneity. The level-1 compositions of the major chromosomes match each other and the genome in maize, zebrafish, yeast and C. elegans, and in fly down to the major arms. Finer classes can be homogeneous too: protein function in Arabidopsis, and the Wicker TE orders in maize. Enzyme reaction classes are interchangeable between chromosomes in all eight genomes. The second finding is a structured heterogeneity. Where a unit departs from its genome, it does so in one of three ways: clusters of named elements, such as rRNA genes or immune receptor loci; megabase-scale compartments, such as TE-rich pericentromeric heterochromatin; and lineage-specific gene families, visible only at the finest levels. Corrected for chance, the genomes fall into groups. For protein function and gene families, composition is more uniform in plants and fly than in vertebrates, and least uniform in C. elegans. For the major classes and TE orders, uniformity follows where each genome places its repeats, along the arms (maize, zebrafish) or around the centromeres (Arabidopsis, fly), not its lineage.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.GN q-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yanying Wu. 2026-10-10. Homogeneity and heterogeneity of functional element composition of genome units across human and seven model organisms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15182

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

CloneOT: predicting clone-specific perturbation responses with lineage-supervised neural inverse optimal transport

Predicting single-cell perturbation responses requires mapping between two unpaired populations of cells measured before and after the perturbation. Optimal transport (OT) provides a principled framework for constructing such mappings by minimizing the transport cost, and neural OT methods (\textit{e.g.}, CellOT) have been employed for this prediction task. However, these methods rely on a fixed transport cost, typically the squared Euclidean distance. This cost may connect cells with the wrong responses. Lineage tracing provides the information needed to learn the cost, as heritable barcodes link the cells of the same clone before and after the perturbation. Here, we propose \CloneOT, a neural inverse OT method that learns both the transport cost and the transport map from partially lineage-traced single-cell datasets. \CloneOT\ represents the cost as a neural network. It learns the cost by minimizing the extra cost that the lineage adds to the optimal transport, so that the cheapest transport keeps the cells of each clone together. Our experiments demonstrate that \CloneOT\ recovers the correct transport on 2D datasets, while the squared Euclidean cost fails. Moreover, \CloneOT\ outperforms five baselines on 14 lineage-tracing perturbation scenarios of cancer cells, for both seen and unseen clones. Furthermore, we show that \CloneOT\ reveals the clone-specific transcriptional programs of drug-tolerant persister cells and forecasts the fate of each clone from its cells before treatment. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/poseidonchan/CloneOT.

q-bio.GN↗

arXiv2026

Robust Machine Learning for Regulatory Sequence Modeling under Biological and Technical Distribution Shifts

Robust machine learning for regulatory genomics is studied under biologically and technically induced distribution shifts. Deep convolutional and attention based models achieve strong in distribution performance on DNA regulatory sequence prediction tasks but are usually evaluated under i.i.d. assumptions, even though real applications involve cell type specific programs, evolutionary turnover, assay protocol changes, and sequencing artifacts. We introduce a robustness framework that combines a mechanistic simulation benchmark with real data analysis on a massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) dataset to quantify performance degradation, calibration failures, and uncertainty based reliability. In simulation, motif driven regulatory outputs are generated with cell type specific programs, PWM perturbations, GC bias, depth variation, batch effects, and heteroscedastic noise, and CNN, BiLSTM, and transformer models are evaluated. Models remain accurate and reasonably calibrated under mild GC content shifts but show higher error, severe variance miscalibration, and coverage collapse under motif effect rewiring and noise dominated regimes, revealing robustness gaps invisible to standard i.i.d. evaluation. Adding simple biological structural priors motif derived features in simulation and global GC content in MPRA improves in distribution error and yields consistent robustness gains under biologically meaningful genomic shifts, while providing only limited protection against strong assay noise. Uncertainty-aware selective prediction offers an additional safety layer that risk coverage analyses on simulated and MPRA data show that filtering low confidence inputs recovers low risk subsets, including under GC-based out-of-distribution conditions, although reliability gains diminish when noise dominates.

q-bio.GN↗

arXiv2026

Unlocking the Regulatory Genome by ARGUS: An Evidence-Constrained Agentic Framework for Interpreting Single Nucleotide Variants

Over 90% of disease-associated variants from genome-wide association studies fall in noncoding regulatory regions, yet their functional interpretation remains a central open problem in genomic medicine. Large language models prompted to interpret such variants routinely hallucinate transcription factor (TF) binding changes, fabricate experimental support, and assign biological significance to statistically negligible signals. We present ARGUS (Agentic Regulatory Genomics for an Uncertainty-aware Scientist), which strictly separates deterministic biological computation from LLM-mediated reasoning. ARGUS wraps 458 DNABERT-based TF binding models in a hypothesis-directed investigation loop where a planner selects evidence sources based on current uncertainty, a verifier deterministically interprets each observation, and intermediate results change the investigation path. On variant rs6983267 at the 8q24 cancer risk locus, the same planner produces four divergent trajectories for four TFs. FOXA1 is rescued in 3 steps when real ADASTRA allele-specific binding data (15 experiments, FDR = 0.030) reveals a model false negative masked by saturation. KLF6 traverses 8 steps across ADASTRA, JASPAR motif analysis, and ENCODE cCRE regulatory annotation before abstaining due to mixed indirect evidence. RAD21 abstains in 8 steps after ADASTRA returns a coverage-qualified but nonsignificant allelic test (5 experiments, FDR = 0.65), and SP1, which shares FOXA1's saturated retained prediction, abstains because no direct experimental evidence exists at this locus. All observations come from real ADASTRA, JASPAR, and ENCODE cCRE queries; none are simulated. A comparison of fixed-priority and LLM-mediated planning shows that the LLM planner reaches identical verdicts with fewer tool calls by declining evidence that cannot resolve the claim under test.

q-bio.GN↗