Best-of-Both-Worlds Fair Division via Subsidies

Surya Panchapakesan; Rohit Vaish

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.14994

Best-of-Both-Worlds Fair Division via Subsidies

Surya Panchapakesan·Rohit Vaish

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the relationship between fair division with $\textit{subsidies}$ and $\textit{best-of-both-worlds}$ (BoBW) fairness for indivisible items. We prove a general reduction of BoBW existence to envy-freeability. Specifically, for any scale-free ex-post property $P$ (e.g., EF1, EFX, PO) and any scale-free valuation class $\mathcal{V}$ (e.g, additive, submodular, subadditive, monotone), if every instance in $\mathcal{V}$ admits a $P$-allocation that can be made envy-free using subsidies, then every such instance admits an ex-ante envy-free lottery supported on $P$-allocations. The proof uses linear programming duality. As applications, the reduction gives alternative proofs of BoBW existence results for additive goods, chores, and mixtures of goods and chores. The converse of our general reduction holds for two agents but fails for three: We provide a four-good counterexample with monotone submodular valuations where an ex-ante envy-free and ex-post EF1 lottery exists, but no allocation is simultaneously EF1 and envy-freeable. For lexicographic valuations, we prove simultaneous EFX, Pareto optimality, and envy-freeability (and hence BoBW guarantees for EFX+PO) for three agents, and show that even EFX and envy-freeability can be incompatible for four agents.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Surya Panchapakesan, Rohit Vaish. 2026-10-10. Best-of-Both-Worlds Fair Division via Subsidies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14994

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Practical approach to $2$-Euclidean Preferences

An election is a pair $(C,V)$ of candidates and voters. Each vote is a ranking (permutation) of the candidates. An election is $d$-Euclidean if there is an embedding of both candidates and voters into $\mathbb{R}^d$ such that voter $v$ prefers candidate $a$ over $b$ if and only if $a$ is closer to $v$ than $b$ is to $v$ in the embedding. For $d\geq 2$ the problem of deciding whether $(C,V)$ is $d$-Euclidean is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete. In this paper, we propose a practical approach to recognizing and refuting $2$-Euclidean preferences. We design a new class of forbidden substructures that works very well on practical instances. We utilize the framework of integer linear programming (ILP) and quadratically constrained programming (QCP). We also introduce reduction rules that simplify many real-world instances significantly. Our approach beats the previous algorithm of Escoffier, Spanjaard and Tydrichová~[Algorithmic Recognition of 2-Euclidean Preferences, ECAI 2023] both in number of resolved instances and the running time. In particular, we were able to lower the number of unresolved PrefLib instances from $343$ to $60$. Moreover, $98.7\%$ of PrefLib instances are resolved in under $1$ second using our approach.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Breaking the Illusion of Artificial Consensus: Clone-Robust Weighting in Arbitrary Metric Spaces

Social media, pseudonymous identities and generative AI have made online platforms highly vulnerable to Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior: by generating large numbers of similar posts, influence campaigns create an illusion of widespread support, exploiting the tendency of users and algorithms alike to mistake frequency for consensus. Clone-robust weighting functions address this problem by assigning influence in a way that is insensitive to near-duplication, as measured by a metric, while remaining symmetric, continuous and local. While prior constructions were restricted to Euclidean spaces, we present a computationally efficient framework for arbitrary metric spaces, based on neighborhood graphs and graph weighting functions satisfying a simple locality condition. As a consequence, the visibility an attacker gains from near-duplicates is bounded independently of their number. We further argue that, in democratically sensitive settings such as news feeds, such guarantees must come with explainability, and introduce sharing coefficients that quantify how influence is transferred between elements of prior volumetric constructions. In the graph setting, we show that sharing measures based on the deletion of vertices or edges are incompatible with locality, and instead define sharing through the addition of clones. Finally, we characterize the resulting interpretability properties and construct clone-robust graph weighting functions satisfying them.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Hierarchical Learning Automata Without a Shared Reinforcement Signal: Recovering the Environment Response From Action-Probability Changes

A hierarchy of learning automata in the sense of Thathachar and Ramakrishnan activates one root-to-leaf path per round, and every automaton on that path updates from the environment response. Analyses of this hierarchy deliver the response to every level. In many deployed hierarchies only the root observes it. The interfaces below carry requests but no feedback channel. This paper shows that the response can be recovered at every level without one. An active child receives one bit, the sign of the change in the action probability its parent assigns to it, and reads the response from that sign. For any update rule in which the selected action's probability rises on reward and does not rise on penalty, the decoded bit equals the response at every depth. This class includes linear reward-penalty, reward-epsilon-penalty and reward-inaction. The protocol hierarchy and the broadcast hierarchy therefore generate identical sample paths, so any convergence result proved for the broadcast hierarchy under these rules holds for the protocol hierarchy as well. The paper then analyses a proportional reward-penalty rule that keeps the allocation interior. For two actions it coincides with symmetric linear reward-penalty. For three or more it lies outside the classical schemes and balances each action's failure rate against its remaining allocation, not its penalty rate. Its mean flow converges globally to a closed-form allocation and drops actions below a computable threshold. High-precision replays on hierarchies of up to 16,384 leaves show zero decoding errors.

cs.GT↗