arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.14850

Displacement Is Endogenous: AI Workers in a Search-and-Matching Labor Market

Ibrahim Denis Fofanah
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We build a labor market in which AI systems enter as workers: they apply for jobs, pass screenings, get hired, and get dismissed, alongside humans. Firms post vacancies, workers search with friction, and product demand slopes downward. Across 30 seeded runs per configuration, AI entry at 70% of the human wage raises unemployment by 4.1 percentage points (95% CI 3.5 to 4.6) and leaves 12.2 fewer humans employed (CI 10.5 to 13.9). Layoffs dominate when AI is much cheaper than humans: the layoff margin accounts for 7.2 of the lost jobs and reduced hiring for 5.0, though most dismissed workers find work again. A wider price gap reduces displacement, because cheap AI makes firms expand: at price parity, with zero dismissals, the unemployment effect is largest at 9.2 points (CI 8.6 to 9.9), all of it through hiring. That parity result survives cutting AI applications from five per period to one. Demand elasticity decides how many workers AI displaces. Screening changes who gets hired and leaves the displacement total unchanged.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNcs.CYq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ibrahim Denis Fofanah. 2026-10-10. Displacement Is Endogenous: AI Workers in a Search-and-Matching Labor Market. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14850

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Extracurricular Exercise and Academic Achievement: Evidence from the China Education Panel Survey

Does physical exercise enhance adolescent academic achievement, and is there an optimal daily duration? Linking two waves of the China Education Panel Survey ($N=8,247$), we examine this association using restricted cubic splines and classroom fixed effects. Prospective estimates without prior-score controls place non-exercising students 0.162 mean subject-z units below peers exercising one hour daily. Flexible baseline-achievement controls shrink this shortfall by 85.1 percent to 0.024. The exercise block is not jointly significant ($p=0.301$), and curvature tests fail to reject linearity ($p=0.659$). Subgroup estimates yield similar gender profiles, with stronger evidence of location variation in English. These findings establish the importance of academic history in observed exercise gradients and challenge prescriptive exercise targets derived from fitted observational turning points.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Media Slant is Contagious

This paper examines the diffusion of media slant. We document the influence of Fox News Channel (FNC) on the partisan slant of local newspapers in the U.S. over the years 1995-2008. We measure the political slant of local newspapers by scaling the news article texts to Republicans' and Democrats' speeches in Congress. Using channel positioning as an instrument for viewership, we find that higher FNC viewership causes local newspapers to adopt more right-wing slant. The effect emerges gradually, only several years after FNC's introduction, mirroring the channel's growing influence on voting behaviour. A main driver of the shift in newspaper slant appears to be a change in local political preferences.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Agentic Workflows for Economic Research: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation

Large Language Models (LLMs) can now assist across the economic research lifecycle, yet general-purpose LLMs and agent systems give no assurance that their outputs meet the discipline's bar. We present an agentic-workflow methodology that carries a research question through the full lifecycle, from ideation and literature review through modeling, data, implementation, estimation, and reporting, across seven specialized teams under a cross-team orchestrator, with human-in-the-loop review at each stage. The methodology incorporates two commitments. The first, trustworthy execution, is a shared infrastructure that verifies outputs, records the provenance of every step, bounds each agent's authority, addresses agent-specific threats, and serves every LLM locally on open weights. The second, reasoning as an economist, makes disciplinary checks explicit in the workflow: agents state identification strategies for causal claims, check structural models against stylized facts by simulation, and search for counterexamples to theoretical claims. Together they produce a first research prototype in hours, with every step's provenance and verification verdict recorded. A two-tier framework evaluates the workflows across fourteen dimensions, combining execution-log metrics with a dual-judge LLM-as-reviewer ensemble across all seven teams.

econ.GN↗