Robust Capital Budgeting

Yunzhi Hu; Fei Li; Hanqing Ye; Dihan Zou

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.14569

Robust Capital Budgeting

Yunzhi Hu·Fei Li·Hanqing Ye·Dihan Zou

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study capital budgeting when a manager privately knows project productivity and her empire-building benefits, while headquarters lacks credible priors. Headquarters minimizes maximum regret relative to informed investment. Without compensation, the optimal policy is a spending cap balancing empire-building overinvestment against profitable investment forgone. Compensation helps when empire-building incentives are weak. The optimal payment incentivizes restraint, declines with investment, and reaches zero at the spending cap, supporting greater managerial discretion. When empire-building incentives are strong, compensation cannot distinguish productive investment from biased expansion; therefore, a spending cap alone is optimal.

Explore related subjects

econ.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yunzhi Hu, Fei Li, Hanqing Ye, Dihan Zou. 2026-10-10. Robust Capital Budgeting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14569

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Calibrated Forecasting and Persuasion

We study a dynamic game where an expert sends probabilistic forecasts to a decision-maker. The decision-maker verifies these forecasts using a calibration test based on past data. How should the expert send forecasts to maximize her payoff while passing the test? For a stationary ergodic process, we characterize the optimal forecasting strategy by reducing the dynamic game to a static persuasion problem. Calibration restricts long-run forecast distributions to mean-preserving contractions of the distribution of truthful forecasts. We compare the payoffs attainable by an informed and uninformed expert, providing a benchmark for the value of information. Finally, we consider a decision-maker who uses a mean-based learning strategy and show that the expert can guarantee at least the calibration benchmark and sometimes strictly more.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

The Limits of Price Discrimination When the Market Is Unknown

Bergemann, Brooks, and Morris (2015) characterize the consumer and producer surplus pairs that segmentation can produce when the distribution of values is known. I fix only the set of possible values and characterize the pairs that some market and some segmentation can produce. They form a convex polygon. Its outer edge is the largest efficient surplus a market can have when its uniform-price profit is capped, net of that profit, and truncated equal-revenue markets attain it. At the values no segmentation is needed; strictly between two values, reaching the frontier requires splitting a market into two extremal markets. With a continuum of values up to $\bar{v}$, consumer surplus is at most $π\ln(\bar{v}/π)$ when producer surplus (the seller's profit) is $π$, this bound is reached without segmentation, and no market gives consumers more than $\bar{v}/e$.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

The fiscal limits of efficient trade

Sustaining efficient trade under private information requires external subsidies. Although a designer cannot avoid deficits on average, they can control exposure. We characterize efficient and truthful mechanisms that minimize the worst-case deficit in markets with many buyers and sellers, under interim participation. This problem is dual to maximizing expected trade surplus under correlation ambiguity, with constraints on submarkets with one agent removed. In bilateral trade, the best deficit ceiling is the competitive surplus in a benchmark continuum market, achieved by a "competitive pivot mechanism". In larger markets, optimal mechanisms are characterized in terms of worst-case residual welfare contributions, but solutions exhibit a complex combinatorial structure. We obtain explicit guarantees under natural participation charge restrictions and establish how the best deficit excess decays as market thickens. Our duality characterization is general and extends to many mechanism design environments (public goods, partnership dissolution), and alternative participation constraints.

econ.TH↗