arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.14112

Does System One Transfer? Calibrated Typed-Decision Models, Label Budgets, and Translation for Indonesian Regional Languages

Romi Fadli·Rusdah·Wahyu Ramadani Putri Utami·Zulfa Malika Amana
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Calibrated typed-decision ("System One") models return a label and a probability in a single forward pass at a small fraction of the cost of large language models (LLMs), yet their evaluation has been almost entirely English. We report a pre-registered evaluation of the commercial Jev model and the open Laya-multilingual model on Indonesian regional languages, using the parallel NusaX sentiment (12 languages) and NusaTranslation sentiment and emotion (7 languages) test sets. Jev is more often correct on sentences that are lexically closer to Indonesian in all three datasets, and presenting the human Indonesian translation instead raises its accuracy by up to 37.2 points, most in languages distant from Indonesian. Its expected calibration error does not grow on regional languages, but its ability to rank its own errors degrades in all three datasets. Retrained classifiers need more than 500 labels per language to match zero-shot Jev in 9 of 10 NusaX regional languages. A confidence-gated cascade that sends Jev's 10-30% least confident decisions to a local IndoBERT classifier matches or exceeds the better of the two systems, and routing to an LLM instead matches that LLM at 24-77% lower API cost. Of six further commercial LLMs (three Claude and three GPT models), five are 4-14 points more accurate than Jev, at several hundred times the API cost where it is reported, while the smallest (Claude Haiku) is less accurate. We release the pre-registration, code and all predictions.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Romi Fadli, Rusdah, Wahyu Ramadani Putri Utami, Zulfa Malika Amana. 2026-10-09. Does System One Transfer? Calibrated Typed-Decision Models, Label Budgets, and Translation for Indonesian Regional Languages. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14112

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Learning From How Humans Correct

In industry NLP application, our manually labeled data has a certain number of noisy data. We present a simple method to find the noisy data and relabel them manually, meanwhile we collect the correction information. Then we present novel method to incorporate the human correction information into deep learning model. Human know how to correct noisy data. So the correction information can be inject into deep learning model. We do the experiment on our own text classification dataset, which is manually labeled, because we need to relabel the noisy data in our dataset for our industry application. The experiment result shows that our learn-on-correction method improve the classification accuracy from 91.7% to 92.5% in test dataset. The 91.7% accuracy is trained on the corrected dataset, which improve the baseline from 83.3% to 91.7% in test dataset. The accuracy under human evaluation achieves more than 97%.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

MBBQ: A Dataset for Cross-Lingual Comparison of Stereotypes in Generative LLMs

Generative large language models (LLMs) have been shown to exhibit harmful biases and stereotypes. While safety fine-tuning typically takes place in English, if at all, these models are being used by speakers of many different languages. There is existing evidence that the performance of these models is inconsistent across languages and that they discriminate based on demographic factors of the user. Motivated by this, we investigate whether the social stereotypes exhibited by LLMs differ as a function of the language used to prompt them, while controlling for cultural differences and task accuracy. To this end, we present MBBQ (Multilingual Bias Benchmark for Question-answering), a carefully curated version of the English BBQ dataset extended to Dutch, Spanish, and Turkish, which measures stereotypes commonly held across these languages. We further complement MBBQ with a parallel control dataset to measure task performance on the question-answering task independently of bias. Our results based on several open-source and proprietary LLMs confirm that some non-English languages suffer from bias more than English, even when controlling for cultural shifts. Moreover, we observe significant cross-lingual differences in bias behaviour for all except the most accurate models. With the release of MBBQ, we hope to encourage further research on bias in multilingual settings. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/Veranep/MBBQ.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

LLMR: Knowledge Distillation with a Large Language Model-Induced Reward

Large language models have become increasingly popular and demonstrated remarkable performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, these models are typically computationally expensive and difficult to be deployed in resource-constrained environments. In this paper, we propose LLMR, a novel knowledge distillation (KD) method based on a reward function induced from large language models. We conducted experiments on multiple datasets in the dialogue generation and summarization tasks. Empirical results demonstrate that our LLMR approach consistently outperforms traditional KD methods in different tasks and datasets.

cs.CL↗