What We Talk About When We Talk About Emotion Editing

Xingzu Zhan; Lin Gu; Ruogu Fang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.13558

What We Talk About When We Talk About Emotion Editing

Xingzu Zhan·Lin Gu·Ruogu Fang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Emotional image editing aims to change the emotion a scene conveys while preserving its essential content. Because the same scene can support different emotional interpretations, achieving an emotional goal requires visual changes grounded in the source context. Motivated by the Component Process Model, which links emotional responses to event appraisal, we investigate neural representations as a reference for these editing decisions. Using TRIBE v2, an fMRI encoding model, we analyze 400 source-target pairs across eight emotion categories. Hidden states from EmoEdit, EmoEditor, and AffectDelta correspond more strongly to predicted target-image responses in visual regions than in affect-related regions. This imbalance motivates ROI-ReFT, which combines source visual responses as a content reference with a predicted affective response change as an editing direction. Two interacting branches use both conditions to guide a frozen editor throughout generation. Predicted responses of the generated image supervise affective change and constrain visual drift. On a post hoc selected subset of 400 editing requests, ROI-ReFT achieves 91.75% target-emotion accuracy and 83.25% joint success, with the same output both matching the target emotion and reaching source-output DINO-I of at least 0.80. Our code and dataset will be publicly released.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Xingzu Zhan, Lin Gu, Ruogu Fang. 2026-10-09. What We Talk About When We Talk About Emotion Editing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13558

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspective-1-Ellipsoid: Formulation, Analysis and Solutions of the Camera Pose Estimation Problem from One Ellipse-Ellipsoid Correspondence

In computer vision, camera pose estimation from correspondences between 3D geometric entities and their projections into the image has been a widely investigated problem. Although most state-of-the-art methods exploit low-level primitives such as points or lines, the emergence of very effective CNN-based object detectors in the recent years has paved the way to the use of higher-level features carrying semantically meaningful information. Pioneering works in that direction have shown that modelling 3D objects by ellipsoids and 2D detections by ellipses offers a convenient manner to link 2D and 3D data. However, the mathematical formalism most often used in the related litterature does not enable to easily distinguish ellipsoids and ellipses from other quadrics and conics, leading to a loss of specificity potentially detrimental in some developments. Moreover, the linearization process of the projection equation creates an over-representation of the camera parameters, also possibly causing an efficiency loss. In this paper, we therefore introduce an ellipsoid-specific theoretical framework and demonstrate its beneficial properties in the context of pose estimation. More precisely, we first show that the proposed formalism enables to reduce the pose estimation problem to a position or orientation-only estimation problem in which the remaining unknowns can be derived in closed-form. Then, we demonstrate that it can be further reduced to a 1 Degree-of-Freedom (1DoF) problem and provide the analytical derivations of the pose as a function of that unique scalar unknown. We illustrate our theoretical considerations by visual examples and include a discussion on the practical aspects. Finally, we release this paper along with the corresponding source code in order to contribute towards more efficient resolutions of ellipsoid-related pose estimation problems.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Optimising for the Unknown: Domain Alignment for Cephalometric Landmark Detection

Cephalometric Landmark Detection is the process of identifying key areas for cephalometry. Each landmark is a single GT point labelled by a clinician. A machine learning model predicts the probability locus of a landmark represented by a heatmap. This work, for the 2024 CL-Detection MICCAI Challenge, proposes a domain alignment strategy with a regional facial extraction module and an X-ray artefact augmentation procedure. The challenge ranks our method's results as the best in MRE of 1.186mm and third in the 2mm SDR of 82.04% on the online validation leaderboard. The code is available at https://github.com/Julian-Wyatt/OptimisingfortheUnknown.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Understanding Transformer-based Vision Models through Inversion

Understanding the internal mechanisms of deep neural networks remains a central challenge in machine learning. In computer vision, one promising yet only preliminarily explored approach is feature inversion via inverse networks, which reconstructs images from intermediate representations using trained inverse networks. In this study, we revisit feature inversion via inverse networks, introducing a novel, modular variant that enables a computationally more efficient application of the technique while, in some cases, producing semantically more coherent image reconstructions. We apply our method to large-scale transformer-based vision models, specifically Detection Transformer, Vision Transformer, Swin Transformer, and Data-Efficient Image Transformer, analyzing the resulting reconstructions across network depth. Our main analysis compares Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, which exhibit the most informative differences among the evaluated architectures. At the same time, results for Swin Transformer and Data-Efficient Image Transformer support the broader applicability of our framework. Our findings reveal gradual representational changes across transformer layers as a shared characteristic of Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, as well as systematic differences in how they preserve contextual shape and fine-grained image details, and in their robustness to color perturbations. These findings deepen understanding of transformer-based vision models and demonstrate the utility of modular feature inversion as an interpretability tool.

cs.CV↗