Realized Tail-Risk Conditional Autoregressive Expectile Models: Accurate and Stable Forecasting Performance

Keisuke Sasaki; Yasuhiro Omori

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.13446

Realized Tail-Risk Conditional Autoregressive Expectile Models: Accurate and Stable Forecasting Performance

Keisuke Sasaki·Yasuhiro Omori

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A realized tail-risk conditional autoregressive expectile (RTCARE) model is proposed for joint forecasting of value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES). Realized tail measures such as the realized quantile and the realized ES, constructed from intraday high-frequency returns, are incorporated into the dynamics and measurement equations of the conditional expectile, allowing information about lower-tail risk to enter the forecasts. The parameters are estimated by Markov chain Monte Carlo, and we evaluate the resulting VaR-ES forecasts in numerical examples and in an empirical application using U.S. stock-return data. Across the considered tail levels, the RTCARE models deliver competitive and often superior forecasting performance relative to existing alternatives, with stable results across Monte Carlo replications and rolling forecast evaluations.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM q-fin.RM stat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Keisuke Sasaki, Yasuhiro Omori. 2026-10-09. Realized Tail-Risk Conditional Autoregressive Expectile Models: Accurate and Stable Forecasting Performance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13446

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Is Inference Conditional on Not Rejecting a Pre-test Less Reliable than Unconditional Inference?

Researchers often report an estimate and confidence interval only if a specification test does not reject - for example, only if a pre-trend test supports a difference-in-differences design. Does this make the reported confidence interval less reliable? We show that when the identifying assumptions hold, the answer is no: conditional on passing the pre-test, the confidence interval may over-cover but cannot under-cover. When the assumptions fail, pre-testing can reduce coverage, but under an additional condition it still improves coverage relative to not pre-testing. A calibration to 12 differences-in-differences examples suggests modest effects of pre-testing on coverage.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Identification, Estimation and Inference Based on Constructed Instruments

We propose a structural projection (SP) method for identifying and estimating structural parameters in regression models associated with endogenous regressors. The method projects the structural error onto the sigma-field generated by the regressors, decomposing it into a conditional mean component and an orthogonal residual. This decomposition yields an internally constructed instrument that is valid whenever the conditional mean lies in a known subspace, avoiding the need for external instruments. We establish identification conditions, derive consistency and asymptotic normality for the resulting estimator, and propose a LASSO-based selection procedure for choosing the subspace when no natural candidate is available. The SP method applies to a broad class of linear, nonlinear, and non-separable models. Simulations show that SP substantially outperforms least-squares-based benchmarks under endogeneity while remaining competitive when it is absent, and we illustrate the method using data on the returns to schooling.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Choosing the Dictionary and Penalty for IV-LASSO

Estimating the first stage of an instrumental variables (IV) model with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) requires choosing a dictionary of technical instruments and a penalty level. First-order asymptotic theory offers no guidance on these choices, as any consistent implementation yields a structural parameter estimator with the same limiting distribution. In finite samples, however, these choices can have a substantial impact on the resulting structural parameter estimate. Working in a model with a single endogenous regressor and homoskedastic Gaussian errors, we use first- and second-order Stein identities to derive the approximate mean squared error (AMSE) of the instrumental-variables LASSO (IV-LASSO) estimator, which can be consistently estimated and used to rank a prespecified list of dictionary-penalty candidates. The AMSE reveals a bias-variance trade-off: more complex first-stage fits better approximate the conditional mean of the endogenous variable but are also more correlated with the structural errors, with complexity measured by the degrees of freedom of the LASSO fit. The weight on this bias rises with the endogeneity of the regressor, a quantity that neither plug-in nor cross-validation penalty rules take into account. Despite the AMSE being derived in a Gaussian model, penalty selection by minimizing the feasible AMSE criterion delivers up to a one-third lower mean squared error compared to cross-validation and plug-in penalty rules in Gaussian and non-Gaussian simulation designs calibrated to the data of Gilchrist and Sands (2016).

econ.EM↗