arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.12665

On the 100% Rule of Linear Programming

Marcia Fampa·Jon Lee
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The so-called ``100% rule'' is a somewhat classical and yet somehow obscure rule that gives some local sensitivity-analysis information based on the very limited local sensitivity-analysis information that is often made available by linear-programming software, derived from an optimal basis that is hidden from the user. Introduced in a classic undergraduate textbook in 1977, half a century ago, it was only picked up on by researchers in a very limited way, and while it appears in some undergraduate textbooks, it tends not to appear in most modern graduate-level textbooks. Our contributions are to celebrate and revive interest in the 100% rule and to extend it in a meaningful way. We introduce a cone rule that certifies primal feasibility for more right-hand sides than the 100% rule does, using the same information, and that can be applied in linear time. We then study when this cone rule is tight, that is, when it captures the entire cone of right-hand sides for which the basis remains feasible. We characterize tightness in every dimension for right-hand sides interior to that cone, make the characterization explicit for m=2 and m=3, and settle the question for tridiagonal bases in every dimension: tightness is impossible once m>=4, and for m=3 we give an explicit criterion in the entries of the basis. We give further results for symmetric, integer and unimodular bases. Finally, when tightness fails, we measure the fraction of the feasibility cone captured by the rule using normalized solid angles. For the autoregressive family at m=3, we obtain a closed-form candidate for the infimum of this fraction over all right-hand sides, whose optimality is supported numerically. We also obtain a closed-form expression for the best case over most of the correlation range, subject to two numerically verified properties, and estimate the best-case value numerically more generally.

Explore related subjects

math.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marcia Fampa, Jon Lee. 2026-10-08. On the 100% Rule of Linear Programming. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12665

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Distributionally Robust Airport Ground Holding Problem under Wasserstein Ambiguity Sets

We develop a distributionally robust formulation of the single-airport ground holding problem (dr-SAGHP) using a $1$-Wasserstein ambiguity set with an $\ell_1$ transportation metric over the full physical capacity support. We exploit the problem's structural properties to develop an exact dynamic programming separation algorithm within delayed constraint generation (DCG-DP). We also develop K-IL, which combines Kelley's cutting-plane method with an integer L-shaped framework to solve a a restricted-support approximation, rs-dr-SAGHP. Delayed constraint generation with MILP separation (DCG-MILP) serves as the computational baseline. Computational experiments demonstrate substantial runtime reductions for DCG-DP and K-IL relative to this baseline. Airport capacity distributions are constructed using Gaussian process regression based on historical weather and operational data at Denver International Airport from 2021 to 2023. We develop a chronological expanding-window calibration procedure to select the Wasserstein radius and the results show that the calibrated dr-SAGHP approaches reduce mean operational cost by approximately $2.6\%$ and the Conditional Value at Risk $\mathrm{CVaR}_{90}$ by approximately $8\%$ relative to the stochastic SAGHP benchmark, while avoiding the excessive conservatism observed in a classical robust optimization benchmark.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

Q-Learning under Finite Model Uncertainty

We propose a robust Q-learning algorithm for Markov decision processes under model uncertainty when each state--action pair is associated with a finite ambiguity set of candidate transition kernels. This finite-measure framework enables user-designed uncertainty models, including competing fitted models and stress scenarios. {The learner observes successor states and their deterministic rewards from every candidate simulator, without requiring explicit knowledge of the transition probabilities or the reward function.} We establish almost sure convergence of the learned Q-function to the robust optimum, and derive a time-uniform high-probability error certificate that separates an observable empirical Bellman residual from transition-kernel estimation error. We also give quantitative finite-ambiguity approximation results for Wasserstein and parametric uncertainty models on finite state spaces. Numerical examples illustrate the effect of scenario selection and compare the tabular algorithm with robust value iteration.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

SAGE: A Set-based Adaptive Gradient Estimator

We introduce a set membership perspective on gradient estimation for black-box scalar functions, in which the gradient is not approximated as a single point estimate but characterised as a member of a set of admissible gradients consistent with available function samples and regularity assumptions. Bounds on gradient uncertainty, obtained from standard multivariate Taylor series results, are used to represent this admissible set through linear inequalities, making gradient uncertainty explicit and directly exploitable. Building on this formulation, we propose an adaptive strategy to refine the admissible gradient set to a desired precision by selectively acquiring new samples only when necessary. The resulting framework naturally accommodates function evaluations affected by noise with finite but a priori unknown bounds, yields the theoretical best attainable precision of the gradient set, and provides the optimal sampling distance from the point of interest to maximise information gain during refinement. Within this framework, we introduce the Set-Based Adaptive Gradient Estimator (SAGE), which extracts an estimate of the true gradient from the admissible set whilst preserving high sample efficiency and robustness to noise. Numerical experiments on large collections of random gradient-query points, as well as in the context of a first-order optimisation method, compared the performance of SAGE against commonly used gradient estimators from the literature. Our results show that SAGE achieved competitive gradient accuracy across noise levels without requiring any a priori noise characterisation. In a first-order optimisation setting, noise-informed competitors can outperform SAGE when such characterisation is available. Nevertheless, SAGE remained broadly competitive, making it particularly attractive in settings where noise characterisation is impractical to obtain.

math.OC↗