arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.12515

CTML: A Comprehensive Framework for Continuous Testing in Machine Learning Operations

Abstract

The increasing use of machine learning (ML) systems in production has highlighted some important weaknesses in traditional software testing methods. Unlike regular software, ML systems can fail in specific ways due to their reliance on data, including issues like data drift, concept drift, and performance decline. To address these issues, this paper introduces the Continuous Testing for Machine Learning (CTML) framework. This framework is designed specifically for MLOps environments and offers a thorough, automated solution. It establishes a standardized way to evaluate ML systems across four main areas: data quality, drift detection, model quality, and pipeline validation. The CTML framework consists of a modular setup that includes a Test Registry, Test Runner, Result Store, and Integration Layer. This design ensures it integrates smoothly with existing Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines and MLOps platforms. We put this framework to the test in a predictive maintenance case study, which showed how effective it is at identifying issues like data drift, performance degradation, and bottlenecks in the pipeline problems that traditional testing methods might overlook. The findings indicate that CTML successfully uncovers critical failures in the system across all testing dimensions, providing useful insights to help keep ML systems running smoothly in production. Overall, this work presents a new, integrated framework that connects academic research with industry best practices, pushing forward the standards in MLOps quality assurance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bestoun S. Ahmed. 2026-10-07. CTML: A Comprehensive Framework for Continuous Testing in Machine Learning Operations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12515

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Code

Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate defective code, ranging from logical bugs to security vulnerabilities. Training-data quality is one contributor to these outcomes alongside model architecture, optimization and alignment, prompting and inference context, and decoding. However, the literature connecting specific training data quality issues to observable generated code quality issues has not been synthesized systematically. We review 114 included papers and establish taxonomies of eight generated-code quality dimensions and two broad groups of training-data issues. We then synthesize 12 recurring relationship families between training-data issues and generated-code outcomes, tracing each to its supporting papers, evidence basis, and limitations. We also synthesize detection and mitigation techniques across the data, model, and generation lifecycle. The findings position data curation as one layer of code-generation quality assurance coordinated with model- and inference-level controls, and identify provenance and controlled attribution as open research needs. Our repository is available at https://github.com/SYSUSELab/From-Data-to-Code.

cs.SE↗

Directed Symbolic Execution for Vulnerability Discovery: An LLM-Guided Approach in KLEE

Symbolic execution effectively discovers security violations but suffers from path explosion. Engines like KLEE therefore use path prioritization heuristics to order state exploration, typically optimizing code coverage. However, path prioritization can become trapped in cyclic control-flow regions, where repeated branching consumes the exploration budget before exploration reaches vulnerable code beyond these cyclic regions. We propose KLEECopilot, a Large Language Model (LLM)-guided directed symbolic execution approach built on KLEE. KLEECopilot uses LLMs to mark potentially vulnerable code and guide path prioritization. It also integrates loop-exit prioritization to escape potentially non-vulnerable cycles and progress toward deeper vulnerabilities. Compared with baselines such as Empc, KLEECopilot improves basic block coverage by 42.24% and line coverage by 125.82%. It discovers 1,335 total violations and 87 unique violations, outperforming the second-best baseline by 32.2% in total violations and Empc by 24.3% in unique violations. Although KLEECopilot is sensitive to model family, it exhibits only marginal sensitivity to model scale, supporting the efficacy of integrating security semantics and loop-exit prioritization. Ablation studies further show that individual components contribute to effectiveness: alternative configurations involving searchers, internal components, marking sources, and prompt variants yield only 54--61 unique violations, while KLEECopilot maintains competitive code coverage.

cs.SE↗

Safety Analysis of CPSs Over-the-air Updates: Test Case Prioritization and Selection

Over-the-air (OTA) updates for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) allow engineers to modify their software wirelessly. In the automotive domain, they enable manufacturers to update software without physical access to the vehicle. However, OTA updates can generate a large number of possible software configurations. For example, end users may decide whether or not to install any given OTA updates. The combinatorial explosion of these configurations hampers SW testing, a standard practice for detecting errors in CPS. To overcome this limitation, we propose CRISP (CRIticality-based Selection and Prioritization), a novel framework supporting test case prioritization and selection in the context of OTA updates. Our framework leverages test case robustness, i.e., how far they are from violating the system requirements, to drive test case prioritization and selection. It enables engineers to rank test case executions from most to least critical, and to select only the critical test cases relevant to a given OTA update. We evaluated our approach using a representative SW product line consisting of seven different vehicles, 22 driving scenarios, and two software components. We considered 224 tests, requiring 59 hours of execution time. We assessed the effectiveness of CRISP across five OTA updates. We compared our solution with (a) a random test case prioritization and selection algorithm, and (b) AP-DISC, identified as the state-of-the-art solution in a recent empirical study on the subject. Our results show that CRISP outperforms our baselines in finding failure-revealing test cases, and that our selection procedure can be configured to find reasonable and practical tradeoffs among accuracy (percentage of failure-revealing test cases identified) and computational time (time required to find them).

cs.SE↗