arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.12074

Re-randomization-probability weighting for population-adjusted comparisons of maintenance outcomes across trial designs

Kim Rand
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Randomized-withdrawal trials re-randomize induction responders to continued treatment or withdrawal. Baseline characteristics are often reported for the induction population but unavailable for responders, limiting population-adjusted indirect comparisons of maintenance outcomes. We describe re-randomization-probability weighting, which combines induction-population calibration with inverse weighting by known maintenance assignment probabilities. Coding induction non-response as failure defines durable response: response at both induction and maintenance. The design weights reproduce induction-population covariate totals in randomization expectation, allowing population adjustment using reported induction baselines. Conditional maintenance probabilities can also be estimated, although different induction treatments generate different responder populations. A synthetic three-trial demonstration reduced durable-response bias from 0.106 to 0.001 and from 0.055 to 0.001 in two comparisons. Full-procedure simulations showed interval coverage of 91.5% - 94.3%; stress scenarios illustrated bias from omitted covariates and incorrect assignment weights. The method connects established design weighting and aggregate dilution approaches to population-adjusted comparison across randomized-withdrawal and treat-through designs. It requires compatible durable-response endpoints and credible transport and modeling assumptions. Withdrawal after different induction regimens is not automatically a common comparator. Where no valid anchor exists, unanchored comparison is appropriate only if its demanding adjustment assumptions are defensible.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kim Rand. 2026-10-08. Re-randomization-probability weighting for population-adjusted comparisons of maintenance outcomes across trial designs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12074

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Inference in generalized linear models with robustness to misspecified variances

Generalized linear models usually assume a common dispersion parameter, an assumption that is seldom true in practice. Consequently, standard parametric methods may suffer appreciable loss of type I error control. As an alternative, we present a semi-parametric group-invariance method based on sign flipping of score contributions. Our method requires only the correct specification of the mean model, but is robust against any misspecification of the variance. We present tests for single as well as multiple regression coefficients. The test is asymptotically valid but shows excellent performance in small samples. We illustrate the method using RNA sequencing count data, for which it is difficult to model the overdispersion correctly. The method is available in the R library flipscores.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Sample-Efficient "Clustering and Conquer" Procedures for Parallel Large-Scale Ranking and Selection

This work aims to improve the sample efficiency of parallel large-scale ranking and selection (R&S) problems by leveraging correlation information. We modify the commonly used "divide and conquer" framework in parallel computing by adding a correlation-based clustering step, transforming it into "clustering and conquer". Theoretically, we develop a novel gradient-based analysis framework and show that this seemingly simple modification substantially improves the performance of large-scale R&S procedures. Our approach enjoys two key advantages: (1) it does not require highly accurate correlation estimation or precise clustering, and (2) it can be seamlessly integrated with various existing fixed-precision and fixed-budget R&S procedures while achieving optimal sample complexity. We also introduce a new parallel clustering algorithm tailored to large-scale settings. Finally, in large-scale AI applications such as neural architecture search, our methods demonstrate superior performance.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

A Dynamic Factor Model for Multivariate Counting Process Data

We propose a dynamic multiplicative factor model for process data arising from complex problem-solving items, an emerging type of data in large-scale educational assessment. The proposed model can be viewed as an extension of the classical frailty models developed in survival analysis for multivariate recurrent event times, but with two important distinctions: (i) the factor (frailty) is of primary interest; (ii) covariates are internal and embedded in the factor. It allows us to explore low-dimensional structure with meaningful interpretation. We show that the proposed model is generically identifiable and that the maximum likelihood estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal. Furthermore, to obtain a parsimonious model and to improve the interpretation of parameters, variable selection and estimation for both fixed and random effects are developed through suitable penalisation. The computation is carried out using a stochastic EM algorithm with elliptical slice sampling in the stochastic E-step and coordinate descent in the M-step. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed approach effectively recovers the true structure. The proposed method is applied to the analysis of the log file of an item from the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), and meaningful relationships are identified.

stat.ME↗