arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.11926

Covering radius of rank-metric codes via covering lifts and clubs

Abstract

We introduce a generator-matrix-based geometric approach to the covering radius of $\mathbb F_{q^m}$-linear rank-metric codes. Starting from the $q$-system associated with the code, we define the notion of covering lift and show that the covering radius can be recovered from the hyperplane weights of such lifts. This yields an exact criterion, in terms of the length and effective length of the code, for the covering radius to attain its largest possible value, together with the upper bound $ρ(\mathcal{C})\le \min\{m,n\}-1$ in all remaining cases. We then specialize our approach to $1$-dimensional codes, for which the effective length coincides with the minimum rank distance. In this setting, codes attaining $ρ(\mathcal{C})= \min\{m,n\}-1$ are related to covering lifts that are clubs. More generally, we characterize this case through linear maps into suitable quotient spaces, obtaining equivalent interpretations in terms of generalised evasive subspaces and auxiliary matrix rank-metric codes. These results determine the covering radius for several boundary values of the minimum distance and for all $1$-dimensional codes with extension degree $m\in\{3,4,5\}$. For $m=6$ and every $q$ we provide constructions and, for $q\in\{2,3\}$, computational results showing that $1$-dimensional rank-metric codes with the same length and minimum distance can have different covering radii.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Giuseppe Marino, Alessandro Neri, Alessia Vallefuoco. 2026-10-08. Covering radius of rank-metric codes via covering lifts and clubs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11926

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Hecke Triangle Groups and Dessins d'Enfants

We study finite-index subgroups of the Hecke triangle group $H_q$ of signature $(2,q,\infty)$ through the finite-edge tessellation, special polygons, and the associated dessins. The quotient finite-edge graph is a connected bipartite ribbon graph in which even vertices have degree $1$ or $2$ and odd vertices may have any degree $d\mid q$; geometrically, degree $d$ records a $d$-cluster and an elliptic stabilizer of order $q/d$. We determine two finite ambiguities that arise when one passes from this quotient graph to a special polygon. First, all tree diagrams obtained from a fixed ribbon graph are classified by the possible spanning-tree cuts modulo graph automorphisms. Second, at a proper cluster one must record which cyclic gap contains the omitted branches of the universal $q$-star; every such choice develops to a special polygon. Combining the two gives an explicit finite description of all polygon orbits over a fixed dessin, together with a separate count of normalized realizations in the fixed tessellation. Concrete examples for $H_5$, $H_6$, and $H_7$ illustrate the geometry, and two arithmetic corollaries concern level-$2$ cusp labels and Galois orbits of principal congruence dessins.

math.CO↗

A new simple family of non-periodic tilings with square tiles

We define a new family of non-periodic tilings with square tiles that is mutually locally derivable with some family of tilings with isosceles right triangles. Both families are defined by simple local rules, and the proof of their non-periodicity is as simple as that of the non-periodicity of Robinson's tilings. We also relate the construction to the classical chair tiling: forgetting the decoration, our tilings map almost one-to-one onto the chair, our substitution is essentially a square root of the chair substitution, and our local rules are perfect, defining exactly the family of substitution tilings.

math.CO↗

Partitioning perfect graphs into comparability graphs

We study how many comparability subgraphs are needed to partition the edge set of a perfect graph. We show that many classes of perfect graphs can be partitioned into (at most) two comparability subgraphs and this holds for almost all perfect graphs. On the other hand, we prove that for interval graphs an arbitrarily large number of comparability subgraphs might be necessary.

math.CO↗