arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.11691

Diffusive Market Impact: A Consistent Microfoundation

Abstract

Structural price diffusivity explains many empirical regularities of market impact including the ``square-root law'' and its crossover to a linear regime for low trading rates \citep{bonart2026diffusive}. One of its central predictions is that an information-neutral trading strategy generates a diffusive impact state. We microfound this result in an economy with a trader and many arbitrageurs who progressively eliminate predictable returns. Each arbitrageur observes realized returns and a private signal of one component of the fundamental return. As aggregate private information becomes complete and under suitable convergence to a stationary limit, the trader's impact law is of the form $j=U\cdot w$, where $w$ is the innovation in the trading schedule and $U$ is causal all-pass. Impact returns are therefore white, even though no individual arbitrageur can reconstruct the underlying trading strategy. We then investigate the economic meaning of the impact phase. We argue that the $U$ which has minimum distance from the filter $L$ generating the trade flow is an especially interesting candidate: Trade flow is then minimally distorted under impact and arbitrage, and it always guarantees positive impact costs. Under a trader flow generated by a biexponential $L$ (the simplest form allowed in our model) an interesting result emerges: Impact decline is confined to a narrow band of $50\%$--$60\%$, lower than some empirical estimates and quite consistent with others. More complicated flow models can lead to different decays. Finally, we argue that in real markets, the impact phase is probably somewhat ``distorted'' in its long-term tails which allows for a full relaxation of the impact propagator. The effect is weak, long-term mean-reversion of the impact state.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Julius F. Bonart. 2026-10-08. Diffusive Market Impact: A Consistent Microfoundation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11691

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deep reinforcement learning for optimal trading with partial information

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has attracted increasing interest in financial applications, including optimal trading and execution. However, the use of RL for optimal trading strategies that exploit latent information in the market has been, to the best of our knowledge, subject to little attention. In this paper, we consider an optimal trading problem in which the trading signal follows an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with regime switching parameters. The problem is naturally formulated as a partially observable Markov decision problem, requiring a trader to infer latent information directly from the history of the observable process. We combine recurrent neural networks (RNN) with RL to address both the filtering and trading components of the problem. More specifically, we propose three distinct RL-based approaches, on top of which we incorporate RNN to filter the latent state of the environment where the agent is trading. The first, a one-step approach, directly encodes hidden states from the GRU into the RL trader. The second and third are two-step methods: one that uses posterior regime probability estimates for the mean reverting regimes, while the other relies on forecasts of the next signal value. Through extensive simulations with increasingly complex Markovian regime dynamics for the trading signal's parameters, as well as an empirical application to equity pairs trading, we find that feeding posterior probability estimates on the latent long-run mean reversion regime achieves superior cumulative rewards and exhibits more interpretable strategies, in contrast with the other two approaches. Overall, our results show that the quality and structure of the information supplied to the agent are important for trading performance and policy interpretability.

q-fin.TR↗

RED-2400: A Public Benchmark of Algorithmically-Rejected Trading Events with Outcome Labels

RED-2400 is a public benchmark of 6,660 algorithmically-rejected trading events from a live Solana decentralised-exchange filter stack, observed continuously over 22 calendar days (2026-04-10T21:10Z through 2026-05-02T21:48Z, UTC). Of the 6,660 rejection events, 3,333 (50.05 percent) link exactly to a post-rejection price-and-liquidity sample series. The deposit contains 169,123 forward-outcome observations and 1,837 graveyard-tracker lifecycle snapshots, covering 1,076 distinct mints in the rejection registry and 1,075 in the forward-observation file. The deposit contains no outcome-label column. In its lifecycle-tracker file, gone is a tracker state recorded with liquidity 0; it is not terminal (167 of the 377 mints that reach it later return to an alive state) and does not denote token death or a rug pull. Filter labels are anonymised to filter_1 through filter_8; source-collector identifiers to source_a and source_b. Liquidity and 24-hour volume are quantised to the nearest power of two, preserving heavy-tailed shape while preventing operational-threshold inference. This is the first window of a planned series; subsequent windows will extend the time horizon and enable regime-stratified analysis. "RED-2400" is a brand name, not a count; current cohort sizes are listed below and do not equal 2,400. Correction (October 2026): I withdraw Section V, which compared how often "early-death" and other rejected mints reach gone; 1,235 of the 1,236 early-death events were followed within 10.5 minutes by a re-rejection of the same token, so the label marks re-rejection timing, not token death. See the correction notice on page 1.

q-fin.TR↗

Diffusive in plain sight: An inconspicuous law of market impact

Decomposing market impact as the difference between realized and counterfactual returns, and requiring both to be diffusive, yields a structural identity that restricts admissible impact dynamics at the level of individual participants. This constraint implies the square-root law in the information-neutral regime and a crossover toward linear impact under strong informational coupling, consistent with empirical observations. It further implies that impact must adapt to each participant's order-flow statistics, with consequences for theories of optimal execution and no-arbitrage. In the information-neutral regime, cumulative impact is itself diffusive, providing a diagnostic that many propagator and latent-liquidity models fail to satisfy. Under this regime, market impact retains an undetermined all-pass degree of freedom that prevents its reduction to a pure surprise model. This residual freedom accommodates transient impact dynamics and can generate strictly positive impact costs.

q-fin.TR↗