arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.11041

Following Breadcrumbs in Code: What Accidentally Committed Ad-Hoc Logs Reveal about Developer Comprehension

Yi-Hung Chou·Boyuan Jiang·Vidit Jain·Yiyang Min·April Yi Wang·James A. Jones
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Developers frequently insert temporary print or log statements, known as **ad-hoc logs**, to better understand program behavior at runtime, particularly when facing unexpected issues or complex control flows. Despite being a nearly universal practice, systematic study has been limited because these logs are ephemeral: they usually remain only in local environments and are removed before code is committed, making them difficult to capture. In this work, we addressed this challenge by mining accidental commits where developers unintentionally left ad-hoc logs and later deleted them, and by analyzing live-streamed programming sessions to observe their use in practice. Using these methods, we constructed a large dataset across three major programming languages (Java, JavaScript, and Python), enabling the large-scale investigation of logging practices. Our analysis reveals both common and language-specific patterns in where and how developers rely on ad-hoc logs. Across languages, ad-hoc logs tend to appear in program regions that are harder to reason about at runtime. We also identify distinctive language-level patterns, such as frequent use in asynchronous and callback functions in JavaScript and in thread-related classes in Java. In addition, functions containing ad-hoc logs generally have higher cyclomatic complexity than the overall function population. Production logs show a similar association, consistent with logging serving as a means of observing runtime behavior in structurally complex functions. Together, these findings provide empirical insight into developers' runtime comprehension practices and offer a valuable dataset for researchers and tool builders seeking to better support debugging and logging.

Explore related subjects

cs.SE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yi-Hung Chou, Boyuan Jiang, Vidit Jain, Yiyang Min, April Yi Wang, James A. Jones. 2026-10-08. Following Breadcrumbs in Code: What Accidentally Committed Ad-Hoc Logs Reveal about Developer Comprehension. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11041

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bistable by Construction: Wall-Clock-Calibrated State Monitors Have No Moment-Detection Regime at Agent Cadence

Runtime monitors for autonomous agents commonly threshold an accumulated internal state - a behavioural baseline, a drift statistic, or, in our prior work, a modelled affective state. We previously reported a State Saturation Trap: threshold-on-state triggers over a continuous affect engine become near-constant alarms on SWE-bench debugging agents (Modgil 2026). A post-release audit found the engine received dt=0 between actions, so its exponential decay never operated: the published trap is a pure-accumulator result. We correct the record (erratum, v2) and treat the flaw as an experiment. The key variable it exposes is whether a monitor's dynamics are calibrated in sample time (per observation, as in CUSUM) or wall-clock time (half-lives in seconds, as in affect models and EMA baselines). On fixed-rate streams these coincide; on agent streams, where inter-action time varies by orders of magnitude, they do not. A pre-registered sweep over uniform intervals (dt in {0..600}s) on 20 trajectories shows the wall-clock level trigger has two regimes: at dt<=1s a constant alarm (20/20; median 18 firings); at dt>=60s silent. Every critical dt lies in (1,30]s. A scriptable gpt-5.4-mini agent loop measures latency at median 1.53s (p90 2.33s), inside the trap regime, vindicating the empirical finding under a corrected mechanism. The structure is a property of the calibration class, not the engine: a minimal wall-clock accumulator over the raw error stream reproduces the same cliff, while a sample-time CUSUM over the identical stream is exactly dt-invariant (20/20). A rising-edge trigger with hysteresis fires 0-3 times per trajectory in every condition. We conclude that wall-clock-calibrated leaky-integrator monitors admit no regime in which they act as moment detectors on agent streams; transition detection escapes the trap at every cadence, but does not recover human intervention timing.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

The Spec Growth Engine: Spec-Anchored, Code-Coupled, Drift-Enforced Architecture for AI-Assisted Software Development

AI coding agents dramatically accelerate implementation speed but introduce two structural failure modes that existing spec-driven approaches do not fully solve: (1) context explosion -- the agent must reason over an entire repository at once, degrading output quality as the context window fills; and (2) silent spec-code drift -- code evolves, the specification does not, and the divergence becomes invisible until it is costly to repair. We present the Spec Growth Engine, a lightweight framework that addresses both failure modes through a machine-readable spec graph whose nodes carry explicit contract/design separation, a Spine context assembler that scopes agent context to an ownership path, a vertical-slice growth protocol that enforces hardest-first ordering, and a drift gate that makes spec-code divergence a blocking merge condition. The design synthesises well-established software engineering principles (Parnas information hiding, C4, ADRs, Walking Skeleton, Reflexion Models, Fitness Functions) into a lean, code-coupled, machine-enforced whole -- without the overhead of heavy-weight frameworks such as RUP or MDA.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Fault Localization: A Trajectory-Level Study of LLM Agents for Microservice Root Cause Analysis

Automated microservice root cause analysis (RCA) is usually evaluated by whether the final answer localizes the fault source. This is insufficient for on-call site reliability engineers (SREs), who need the evidence and reasoning behind the fault. Evaluating the process is hard because agent trajectories interleave free-form reasoning with heterogeneous tool calls and telemetry results, making it difficult to assess agents' behavior. To assess how well RCA agents ground diagnoses in evidence, we propose a trajectory-analysis methodology that characterizes evidence navigation and utilization, SRE-oriented diagnostic intent, and recurring failure modes. Our key insight is that fault-propagation paths give a causal reference for where agents investigate and how they use evidence. With it, we analyze 5,000 trajectories from ten framework-backbone configurations (nine agent frameworks, two backbone models) on RCABench. Correct localization can hide deficiencies in causal reconstruction. Successful investigations use retrieved evidence to guide later queries, consider broader diagnostic intents, and investigate more deeply. Failed investigations drift toward unrelated services or repeat shallow queries; recurring failures arise from omitted evidence, misinterpreted evidence, and unsupported reasoning. To test whether these patterns can guide improvement, we build a lightweight defense prototype targeting the three failure families. Across two held-out benchmarks, two backbone models, and six diagnostic frameworks, the failure patterns recur; the prototype reduces their prevalence and raises Acc@1 by 3.5-35.1 percentage points in every configuration, suggesting that the mined failures generalize and are actionable. Our findings motivate a process-level view of automated RCA, in which trajectories reveal whether a diagnosis is correct, well-grounded, and open to improvement.

cs.SE↗