arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.10946

AI4Fire: Evaluating Large Language Models on Wildfire Tasks

Yue Zhao·Zuobin Xiong·Xiyang Hu·Zhangyu Wang·Xiongye Xiao·Ruolin Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are entering wildfire management, where overstated evaluations can cost property and lives. How do they perform on wildfire tasks, with and without grounding? Bare means a model receives the task input alone. Grounded means it also receives one task-specific addition: for smoke detection, a smoke-free reference frame from the same camera. AI4Fire runs six core models bare and grounded on five wildfire tasks, zero-shot; a sweep adds 29 more. Our literature search on fire tasks found 138 works; none combines this roster, task coverage, and paired bare and grounded runs. We report three findings. (1) Grounding helped most where the addition carried the answer: a read-only SQL tool lifted every core model's database accuracy from at most 16 to at least 88 percent. (2) Simple rules were hard to beat: no core model outperformed repeating today's staffing count, and two open-weight models mostly copied the median of similar earlier fire-days, a worse forecast. (3) Public releases carry hazards: a fire-danger column separates the holdout perfectly, and 67 aerial fire frames carry smoldering or fire-free labels read from a clipped thermal maximum. We release prompts, responses, scores, code, and the survey record.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yue Zhao, Zuobin Xiong, Xiyang Hu, Zhangyu Wang, Xiongye Xiao, Ruolin Li. 2026-10-11. AI4Fire: Evaluating Large Language Models on Wildfire Tasks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10946

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

STAPO: Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning for LLMs by Silencing Rare Spurious Tokens

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has significantly improved large language model reasoning, but existing RL fine-tuning methods rely heavily on heuristic techniques such as entropy regularization and reweighting to maintain stability. In practice, they often suffer from late-stage performance collapse, leading to degraded reasoning quality and unstable training. We identify a key factor behind this instability: a small fraction of tokens, termed spurious tokens (around 0.01%), which contribute little to the reasoning outcome but receive disproportionately amplified gradient updates due to inheriting the full sequence-level reward. We present a unified framework for evaluating token-level optimization impacts across spurious risk, gradient norms, and entropy changes. Building on the analysis of token characteristics that severely disrupt optimization, we propose the Silencing Spurious Tokens (S2T) mechanism to efficiently suppress their gradient perturbations. Incorporating this mechanism into a group-based objective, we propose Spurious-Token-Aware Policy Optimization (STAPO), which promotes stable and effective large-scale model refinement. Across six mathematical benchmarks and three model scales, STAPO consistently demonstrates superior entropy stability and achieves average accuracy improvements over baselines including GRPO, 20-Entropy, and JustRL under two widely-adopted evaluation settings.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

What You See Is What You Get: Observation-Aligned Supervision for Chart-to-Code Generation

Chart-to-code generation is commonly trained through supervised fine-tuning on reference plotting scripts, implicitly treating the gold code as a fully observable target. However, many chart programs contain latent variables that cannot be uniquely recovered from the rendered image. We identify this latent-observation mismatch in four forms across five chart types: aggregation-induced mismatch, where raw samples are reduced to box statistics or histogram bin masses; normalization-induced mismatch, where absolute scale is removed in pie charts; projection-induced mismatch, where 3D information is lost through 2D rendering; and level-set-induced mismatch, where a scalar field is observable only through selected contour lines. These mismatches introduce target ambiguity and require models to generate information unsupported by the image. We propose Observation-Aligned Supervision, which replaces latent variables with visually constrained quantities. And we study fixed-view 3D scatter and contour charts through controlled experiments. Across VLMs, observation-aligned supervision generally improves observable recovery end-to-end and under both-executable evaluation. Against compact analytic contour formulas, end-to-end performance declines despite better conditional boundary recovery in both-exec setting, suggesting a trade-off with representational compactness.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Budget-Aware Compression Pipeline for Single-GPU LLM Inference: Methods, Trade-offs, and Coupling Effects

Single-GPU deployment of 70B-parameter language models on an NVIDIA GPU is constrained by device memory, long-context throughput, and engineering integration cost. We cast single-GPU inference as a budget-aware design problem over these three axes and study how pruning, quantization, and KV-cache compression interact under realistic execution. Controlled ablations show that layer-wise pruning makes weight quantization more robust. KV-cache sparsification complements INT8 KV quantization by reducing memory without hurting decoding speed, while static vector quantizers often conflict with dynamic caching. Guided by these coupling results and explicit budget tracking, we assembled a practical pipeline and compressed a 70B model to about 33 GB, sustained about 57 tokens/s on 10k token prompts on a single A40, and kept absolute accuracy within 5% on common and reasoning benchmarks. We contribute design rules and a reproducible evaluation protocol that jointly report quality, memory, and end-to-end speed, and we provide a foundation for automated pipeline search under realistic single-GPU constraints.

cs.CL↗