arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.10477

Primal/Dual Method for the Grothendieck Constant

Abstract

We determine the hundredths digit of the real Grothendieck constant by proving $1.773 \leq K_G \leq 1.7799$. Furthermore, numerical heuristics suggest the estimate $K_G \approx 1.779$. We start by simplifying the Gaussian duality theory of $K_G$, based on Hermite projection games and Krivine rounding schemes. The bounds are obtained by a heuristic primal/dual search for these objects, followed by rigorous {\em certification} of their values. The search and certification are performed using AI tools, and in particular the rigorous certificates are very large (analytical reductions to thousands of numerical inequalities).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Steven Heilman, Chris Jones, Giulio Malavolta. 2026-10-07. Primal/Dual Method for the Grothendieck Constant. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10477

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Near-Inverse-Linear Barriers for Explicit Affine Witness Isolation

We study randomized nonuniform polynomial-size transformations that output explicit binary affine filters for circuit inputs whose nonempty satisfying sets are affine. The filter may depend on the entire input description; no affine basis is supplied. For every fixed $δ<1$, a worst-case singleton success guarantee $Ω(n^{-δ})$, where $n$ is the witness arity, implies $NP\subseteq P/poly$. More generally, any success guarantee $ω(\log n/n)$ yields satisfiability circuits of size $(s+2)^{O(1)}2^{o(v)}$ for length-$s$ descriptions with at most $v$ witness variables, hence subexponential in $v$ when $s=v^{O(1)}$. Conversely, SAT search-to-decision gives deterministic perfect isolation, making polynomial-resource fixed-exponent strong affine isolation equivalent to $NP\subseteq P/poly$. For explicit unions of at most $n^β$ affine components, success $Ω(n^{-δ})$ implies the same collapse whenever $β,δ\ge0$ and $β+δ<1$. The inverse-linear endpoint is not claimed.

cs.CC↗

Countability versus Computability

The concept of {\em countable sets} is attributed to Georg Cantor, who established the distinction between countable and uncountable sets in 1874. The concept of {\em computable sets} emerged in the 1930s through the foundational work on computing models by \Godel, Church, and Turing. In this paper, we investigate the connection between countability and computability. A {\em counting bijection} of a set $S$ is a bijection from the set of natural numbers to $S$. We say $S$ is {\em enumerable} if it is either finite or admitting a computable counting bijection. Our initial investigation shows that a set $S$ is enumerable if and only if it is computable. This equivalence offers new insights into set theory and computability theory. We further show that a set is countable if and only if it admits a {\em counting order}, which is a well order satisfying the {\em proximal} property. Based on this concept, we provide a procedure whose existence gives a necessary and sufficient condition for a set to be countable. This procedure is an algorithm if and only if the set is computable. A counting bijection $f$ is {\em increasing} if $f(x)>f(y)$ whenever $x>y$. We prove that an infinite set $S$ of natural numbers is definable in first-order arithmetic if and only if $S$ has an increasing counting bijection. This result has a significant implication: the standard proof that every set $S$ of natural numbers is countable is invalid. This is because the existing proof establishes that $S$ has an increasing counting bijection, which (by our result) would imply that $S$ is definable in first-order arithmetic. This leads to a contradiction with Tarski's undefinability theorem when $S$ is the set of \Godel\ numbers of the true arithmetic sentences.

cs.CC↗