arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.10433

The replica symmetric solution for hypergraph independent sets in the critical regime

Abstract

We prove a variational formula for the logarithmic asymptotics of a non-existence probability in a broad class of combinatorial problems such as avoiding cliques in random graphs and $k$-term arithmetic progressions in random subsets of integers. These results follow from a formula for the probability that a binomial random subset of the vertices of a locally sparse hypergraph is an independent set. The formula holds throughout the critical regime, interpolating between the regimes in which Janson's inequality and the method of hypergraph containers give the respective asymptotics. The formula is the replica-symmetric Bethe free energy formula from statistical physics applied to a hypergraph hardcore model. The proof uses two new techniques. The first, for the upper bound, involves revealing a small `window' of a random independent set and then applying entropy methods. The second, for the lower bound, involves the analysis of a random greedy algorithm guided by a Belief Propagation fixed point. In the case of avoiding cliques in random graphs, the variational formula can be expressed as an optimization problem over graphons. Moreover, typical random graphs conditioned on not containing $K_r$, when suitably normalized, approach the set of optimizing graphons in cut distance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matthew Jenssen, Will Perkins, Aditya Potukuchi, Michael Simkin. 2026-10-07. The replica symmetric solution for hypergraph independent sets in the critical regime. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10433

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Hecke Triangle Groups and Dessins d'Enfants

We study finite-index subgroups of the Hecke triangle group $H_q$ of signature $(2,q,\infty)$ through the finite-edge tessellation, special polygons, and the associated dessins. The quotient finite-edge graph is a connected bipartite ribbon graph in which even vertices have degree $1$ or $2$ and odd vertices may have any degree $d\mid q$; geometrically, degree $d$ records a $d$-cluster and an elliptic stabilizer of order $q/d$. We determine two finite ambiguities that arise when one passes from this quotient graph to a special polygon. First, all tree diagrams obtained from a fixed ribbon graph are classified by the possible spanning-tree cuts modulo graph automorphisms. Second, at a proper cluster one must record which cyclic gap contains the omitted branches of the universal $q$-star; every such choice develops to a special polygon. Combining the two gives an explicit finite description of all polygon orbits over a fixed dessin, together with a separate count of normalized realizations in the fixed tessellation. Concrete examples for $H_5$, $H_6$, and $H_7$ illustrate the geometry, and two arithmetic corollaries concern level-$2$ cusp labels and Galois orbits of principal congruence dessins.

math.CO↗

A new simple family of non-periodic tilings with square tiles

We define a new family of non-periodic tilings with square tiles that is mutually locally derivable with some family of tilings with isosceles right triangles. Both families are defined by simple local rules, and the proof of their non-periodicity is as simple as that of the non-periodicity of Robinson's tilings. We also relate the construction to the classical chair tiling: forgetting the decoration, our tilings map almost one-to-one onto the chair, our substitution is essentially a square root of the chair substitution, and our local rules are perfect, defining exactly the family of substitution tilings.

math.CO↗

Partitioning perfect graphs into comparability graphs

We study how many comparability subgraphs are needed to partition the edge set of a perfect graph. We show that many classes of perfect graphs can be partitioned into (at most) two comparability subgraphs and this holds for almost all perfect graphs. On the other hand, we prove that for interval graphs an arbitrarily large number of comparability subgraphs might be necessary.

math.CO↗