arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.10069

Demand Models for Market-Level Data with Closed-Form Inverses

Abstract

We introduce a class of demand models for market-level data. The models can be estimated by linear instrumental variables regression while accommodating substitution patterns far richer than the logit and nested logit models they embed. They are built from closed-form inverse market share functions through a generator analogous to McFadden's generalized extreme value generating function, but acting on market shares. Constructive results allow arbitrary nesting structures, including overlapping nests and partial membership, yielding inverse-share analogs of generalized extreme value models. The class is consistent with utility maximization and strictly larger than the class of regular additive random utility models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Julien Monardo, Mogens Fosgerau, André de Palma. 2026-10-07. Demand Models for Market-Level Data with Closed-Form Inverses. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Ownership Networks and Economic Power in the Italian Energy Sector

The energy sector is a cornerstone of national strategic autonomy, yet its increasing financialization has transformed ownership structures into complex networked configurations. This paper investigates the distribution of economic power in the Italian energy sector by introducing two sector-level extensions of the Network Power framework: the Aggregate Network Power Index (A-NPI) and the Aggregate Network Power Flow (A-NPF). Unlike traditional macro-level measures, these indices aggregate firm-level control and influence into a systemic framework that accounts for the relative economic weight of each operator. Applying this framework to the Italian case reveals a Governance Paradox: while the State retains formal majority ownership, the sector's deepening reliance on global capital markets and the pervasive presence of common ownership by transnational institutional investors may have altered the relationship between formal public ownership and effective strategic influence. The results reveal a significant concentration of aggregate network power around a relatively limited number of globally diversified institutional investors operating across multiple strategically relevant firms. This configuration raises important questions for European strategic autonomy and infrastructure governance, highlighting potential limitations of traditional Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening and antitrust tools in capturing the systemic influence exerted through networked ownership structures.

econ.GN↗

Integrity at Stake: Statistical Detection of Anomalous In-Play Betting in Football

Match-fixing undermines the integrity of sport by eroding public trust and threatening the financial sustainability of clubs and leagues. The expansion of sports betting markets has created new incentives and opportunities for manipulation, calling for rigorous, data-driven monitoring tools. Football, which accounts for the largest share of global betting turnover, remains particularly exposed: integrity reports continue to flag several suspicious matches, with past scandals in Italy and Turkey underlining the problem's persistence. This study uses high-frequency in-play (live) betting data from the Italian Serie B (seasons 2018/19--2020/21) to explore statistical approaches for detecting unusual betting behaviour. A state-space modelling framework is employed to describe standard betting market dynamics and to predict expected betting volumes conditional on match characteristics. Deviations from these expectations can then be analysed using outlier detection techniques to identify potentially suspicious betting activities. The results demonstrate how statistical modelling can contribute to the early identification of unusual betting patterns, thereby supporting integrity assurance in in-play sports betting markets.

econ.GN↗

The addicted predator-prey model: How opioid use disorder shapes productivity and growth-cycle dynamics

This paper extends Goodwin's (1967) predator-prey growth-cycle model to incorporate the negative impact of Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) on labor productivity. Using U.S. state-level data for 1998--2019, we first document that deteriorations in the labor share are followed by rising drug-induced mortality. We then build this link into the model through a novel discrete-choice mechanism in which the probability of OUD decreases with the wage share, so when real wages fail to keep pace with productivity growth, opioid use rises. This behavioral health channel feeds back into the economy through a productivity damage function. Applying the existence part of the Andronov-Hopf bifurcation theorem, we show that the resulting three-dimensional nonlinear system admits a limit cycle, as confirmed by our numerical simulations. Along the cycle, rising OUD paradoxically raises the employment rate, as falling productivity requires more labor per unit of output; across steady states, however, higher OUD prevalence is associated with a lower employment rate, consistent with evidence that opioid use disorder reduces labor force participation. Moreover, our numerical experiments show that OUD sensitivity to income widens fluctuations, while productivity sensitivity to OUD counterintuitively compresses them through a self-correcting feedback that speeds the recovery of the wage share. Policies that weaken the link between income and OUD, such as stronger social safety nets, stabilize the resulting dynamics.

econ.GN↗