Theory of Situations

Marie-Jeanne Perrin-Glorian; Claire Margolinas

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.09942

Theory of Situations

Marie-Jeanne Perrin-Glorian·Claire Margolinas

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Guy Brousseau began developing the theory of situations in the 1960s, with the ambition of building an experimental epistemology of mathematics. Over the decades, the theory has been structured, consolidated and extended, drawing on the contributions of numerous researchers. It is now recognized as one of the ''genuine ground theories'' in mathematics education. In this chapter, we will describe the foundations and reasons for the existence of this theory, its systemic approach to teaching and learning issues, its current architecture, which articulates a theory of mathematical situations and a theory of didactic situations, and its key concepts, as well as its functions, particularly its predictive and explanatory functions. We will illustrate this presentation with an example in geometry that also highlights the role played by the didactic engineering methodology in this theory and related work.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Marie-Jeanne Perrin-Glorian, Claire Margolinas. 2026-10-07. Theory of Situations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09942

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Primer on Ethics in Mathematics

This is a course about Ethics in Mathematics. That is, about the ethical issues that arise in mathematics itself, in mathematical work, and in the actions of mathematicians, broadly interpreted to cover all mathematically-powered technologies. This is a novel course. Traditionally, ethics has seldom been considered by, let alone taught within, the mathematics discipline. This course seeks to change that, by bringing to light the specific ethical issues relevant to mathematics, in a way that is clear and understandable to mathematicians. This course is written by mathematicians, for mathematicians, and about mathematicians. It presents new and original material, in the form of case studies covering harmful and unethical behaviour, analysis of the causal chain of events leading to such harm, and examination of the surrounding processes that drive such actions. All this is fully cited, and supported with interactive activities to aid learning. It develops much of the foundational theory of ethics in mathematics: what can go wrong, why it goes wrong, and how to address it. Students and practitioners alike take away an understanding of the context of their mathematical work, and how to change their actions to ensure more appropriate and useful outputs. In contrast to more traditional philosophy teaching, this course does not delve into the depths of ethical theory. Rather, it presents a practical, hands-on, pragmatic approach to ethics in mathematics, treating it as a branch of applied ethics. It uncovers the very particular ethical issues that arise from mathematical technologies, as well as show how general principles from ethics and responsible development apply even to mathematical work. As such, this makes it highly relevant to adjacent areas such as computer science, physics, engineering, and any other numerate discipline.

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarks in Leipzig

Between April 1 and May 15, 2026, a group of 49 mathematicians compiled a dataset of research-level mathematics questions with known answers. Most of the work was done during the three-day workshop Benchmarks in Leipzig with 35 participants at the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences in Leipzig, Germany. We present the resulting collection of 100~questions. We evaluated these questions in three stages: a single attempt by five state-of-the-art LLMs and their predecessors, followed by a 20-runs-per-model evaluation with three of these models, and finally a 3-run attempt with two heavy-thinking models. After Stage 1, 41 questions remained completely unsolved; after Stage 2, this count dropped to 16; and we concluded Stage 3 with only 2 unsolved questions. This demonstrates that the mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLMs are becoming impressive. In September 2026, we added a fourth stage in which the next generation of models attempted all 100 questions once more, after which only 1 question remains unsolved.

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

The Quarter-Turn and the Ball

In his Tau Manifesto, Michael Hartl presents a formula, credited to Jeff Cornell, for the volume of the unit $n$-ball in terms of the quarter-turn constant $η=π/2$. We read the formula as a set of clues to a geometric proof, leading through orthant geometry and a higher-dimensional version of Lambert's equal-area projection. We conclude with some additional thoughts on the circle constant.

math.HO↗