arXiv · 2610.09679
CERO: Where and When to Allocate Rollouts for RL Post-Training
Abstract
Adaptive rollout methods for group-relative reinforcement learning typically allocate a fixed per-update budget across prompts. We instead study how to coordinate a finite rollout budget over the entire training horizon. We formulate this problem using a concave surrogate utility of cumulative prompt exposure and introduce CERO, an online primal dual scheduler for prompt admission and budget pacing. In our experiments, each admitted prompt receives a fixed-size response group. CERO instead adapts which prompts are selected, how often they are revisited across rounds, and how many groups are generated in each round. A compact Fenchel representation linearizes the dependence on cumulative exposure, while projected online gradient descent updates prompt-specific supporting slopes and a shared budget price using reward-variation feedback and budget deviations. We establish pathwise guarantees for the surrogate allocation objective against fixed-rate and same-path time-varying benchmarks, with explicit terms for proxy discrepancy and rate variation. Under matched training-response budgets, CERO attains the highest avg@16 macro-average on each of three backbones across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks. Mechanistic analyses link CERO's prompt choices to within-group reward contrast, while multi-seed ablations show gains from adaptive pacing over both uniform and preset spending schedules.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Yiming Zong, Yige Wang, Xing Hu, Jiashuo Jiang, Zuo-Jun Max Shen. 2026-10-07. CERO: Where and When to Allocate Rollouts for RL Post-Training. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09679
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.