arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.09637

Tracing Inputs, Verifying Outputs: Validating Attribution in Music Generation

Taejun Kim·Wonil Kim·Jongmin Jung·Hyeongseok Wi·Sangeun Kum·Keunhyoung Luke Kim·Taehyoung Kim·Dongjoo Moon·Seungsoon Park·Taewan Kim·Virginie Berger·Juhan Nam·Jongpil Lee
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

How can we verify whose music contributed to an AI-generated output? This paper demonstrates how input-based attribution can provide verifiable evidence of which audio sources were used in a generation and whether they shaped the output. To do so, we condition the generation solely on audio without any text input, then trace the inputs behind each output, and establish their musical effect. In prompt adherence tests and controlled input swaps, the stems generated by our generator, MixAudio, follow the prompt audio in timbre and the context audio in harmony. Yet these outputs may still reproduce training data not supplied as inputs. We therefore audit memorization with our musical version identification model, musicDNA, and find few reproductions outside the input records. On human-judged cases within the flagged pool, it achieves higher precision and recall than the other tested memorization detectors. The two evaluations suggest that input records and output analysis provide complementary evidence for attribution, on which rights-holder reporting and compensation can draw as the AI music economy takes shape. Audio examples are available at https://neutune.github.io/attr2027demo/

Explore related subjects

cs.SDcs.LGeess.AS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Taejun Kim, Wonil Kim, Jongmin Jung, Hyeongseok Wi, Sangeun Kum, Keunhyoung Luke Kim, Taehyoung Kim, Dongjoo Moon, Seungsoon Park, Taewan Kim, Virginie Berger, Juhan Nam, Jongpil Lee. 2026-10-07. Tracing Inputs, Verifying Outputs: Validating Attribution in Music Generation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09637

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Auditing generative audio calls for known-task audio-llm evaluation

Speech and audio LLMs are evaluated by comparing waveform predictions with predictions from an automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcript. For fixed closed-set tasks, this conflates acoustic evidence with the need to invoke a generative audio model. We estimate incremental call value with matched selectors sharing pre-call evidence. Each policy may retain the transcript label, use a local encoder, or invoke a generative model; matched control removes generative actions but preserves pre-call evidence and development selection. On VocalSound, transcript-only accuracy is 0.296, while supervised CLAP and WavLM controls reach 0.850 and 0.854 without calls. Full selector reaches 0.925 at 12.5% calls versus 0.921 for matched No-call selector (difference 0.004; 95% CI [-0.025, 0.033]). Thus, results do not show a call gain after transcript and encoder evidence are available. Relevant quantity is incremental accuracy from allowing calls, not the waveform-transcript gap.

cs.SD↗
arXiv2026

Post-Training Zero-Shot TTS for Fine-Grained Emotion and Duration Control via Natural Language

Audiobook narration, conversational agents, and audiovisual dubbing require speech that conveys changing emotions and adapts its pacing within a single utterance. But most existing TTS systems typically rely on utterance-level style conditioning, making such fine-grained control difficult to achieve. In light of this, and inspired by the success of post-training in large language models, we propose a unified post-training framework that equips pretrained text-to-speech models with natural-language control over segment-level emotion and duration. Supervised fine-tuning establishes instruction-conditioned speech generation, while reinforcement learning with group relative policy optimization refines control accuracy using emotion and duration rewards alongside content and speaker preservation objectives. By reusing the pretrained architecture, our approach avoids additional inference-time control modules. Experiments demonstrate significantly improved fine-grained controllability while maintaining speech intelligibility and speaker identity, highlighting post-training as a practical approach to extending existing speech synthesis models.

cs.SD↗
arXiv2026

Do Language Models Need Music Supervision? Verifiable Rewards for Multi-Constraint Symbolic Music Generation

Language models now generate symbolic music from text, and research has focused on musicality. However, many applications require a score that meets explicit constraints, which models struggle to satisfy jointly: on MusicConstraintBench, our benchmark of 2,180 items over eight families of programmatically verifiable constraints, Llama-3.1-70B satisfies 0.630 of single-constraint items but only 0.044 of four-constraint ones. As a remedy, we introduce MusicRLVR, which trains a language model with group relative policy optimisation (GRPO) on verifier rewards alone, needing no human annotation, reward model or music-domain supervised fine-tuning. MusicRLVR incorporates (1) a hard validation gate that rejects malformed scores, (2) graded per-family credit that, unlike a binary reward, separates partially correct outputs, and (3) an all-satisfied bonus for meeting every constraint at once. Extensive experiments show that, in under four hours of training, MusicRLVR raises Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 from 0.160 to 0.797 on mixed constraints, outperforming Llama-3.1-70B, and generalises to unseen property combinations, out-of-range parameters and more constraints than any training prompt. The recipe transfers to Qwen3-8B, and neither trained model loses significant accuracy on general benchmarks.

cs.SD↗