arXiv · 2610.09550
Visual Evidence Under Cross-Examination: Evaluating and Controlling Decision-Level Evidence Use in Vision-Language Models
Abstract
Vision-language models increasingly reason through crops, regions, and tool-produced observations. Yet an observation can influence the answer without benefiting the candidate it supports. We study candidate-bound visual contribution: valid evidence should help, invalidating its supporting relation should remove its additional effect, and valid rebinding should redirect that effect to the newly supported candidate. We introduce CROSS-Bench, a benchmark of 28,000 decision problems, with matched invalidation and rebinding tests on a dedicated evaluation subset. Our RIVET interface preserves evidence identity and uncertainty, composes a candidate-conditioned response, and separately controls its strength. Shared-evidence experiments show that task accuracy and evidence ownership can diverge. Under matched capacity and training, RIVET increases normalized effect transfer from 0.512 to 0.651 where clean evidence has a positive effect. The advantage persists on common evaluation examples and across repeated decision-layer fits. With evidence predicted from raw inputs, RIVET improves CROSS-Bench accuracy by an average of 5.70 pp across four frozen backbones, relative to the same models without auxiliary evidence. These results separate the utility of visual evidence from the candidate-specific destination of its effect.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Huiyao Zhang, Jin Bai, Zilong Su, Rui Guo, Chaofan Qin, Jinze Lv, Wenhui Yu, Hongfei Wang, Ye Li. 2026-10-07. Visual Evidence Under Cross-Examination: Evaluating and Controlling Decision-Level Evidence Use in Vision-Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09550
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.