arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.09344

Do Image Editors Follow Depth-Dependent Blur and Aperture Response? A Rendered-Ground-Truth Pilot Audit

Zhihan Chen·Yuhuan Zhao·Yijie Zhu·Xinyu Yao·Mengcong Ren·Yuchen Sun·Yunqing Chen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

General image editors are asked to make a photo look as if it were taken at f/1.4, yet it is rarely checked whether the blur they add follows thin-lens optics. A physical aperture edit spreads blur across depth in thin-lens proportions and changes the blur when the aperture changes; prior evaluations check blur monotonicity, sharpness-trend correlation, effective-aperture error, or vision-language judgments, and none we found reports the two properties separately at known depths. In this pilot audit of two editors (Gemini~3.1 Flash Image and GPT-image-2.5) we compare against a rendered oracle: Blender Cycles scenes with true thin-lens depth of field, one blur-width estimator applied identically to oracle and editor outputs, and preregistered depth and aperture indices. In 24 texture scenes rendered in one three-panel geometry, accepted and measurable panels show f/1.4-to-f/2.8 width ratios, $\barσ_{1.4}/\barσ_{2.8}$, of 0.99--1.18 against 1.98--2.13 for the oracle, and ratios of pooled median Gaussian-equivalent near/far blur widths of about 1.18--1.25 (Gemini) and 0.97--1.05 (GPT-image) against 1.69--1.82. Preregistered black-box interventions show that qualitative wording changes blur strength by roughly 2--10 times, whereas a request for 2 versus 6 px changes it 1.1--1.3 times and no tested wording of the f-number meets the registered ``followed'' criterion. The depth compression appears in the original and reversed centre-focus layouts; with the focus on the near panel, the available-panel depth index reaches the registered threshold, and the aperture response stays attenuated in every layout tested. Scalar metrics adapted from published ones give oracle-like scores to synthetic editors whose proportions are compressed.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhihan Chen, Yuhuan Zhao, Yijie Zhu, Xinyu Yao, Mengcong Ren, Yuchen Sun, Yunqing Chen. 2026-10-07. Do Image Editors Follow Depth-Dependent Blur and Aperture Response? A Rendered-Ground-Truth Pilot Audit. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09344

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

BiPO: Bidirectional Partial Occlusion Network for Text-to-Motion Synthesis

Generating natural and expressive human motions from textual descriptions is challenging due to the complexity of coordinating full-body dynamics and capturing nuanced motion patterns over extended sequences that accurately reflect the given text. To address this, we introduce BiPO, Bidirectional Partial Occlusion Network for Text-to-Motion Synthesis, a novel model that enhances text-to-motion synthesis by integrating part-based generation with a bidirectional autoregressive architecture. This integration allows BiPO to consider both past and future contexts during generation while enhancing detailed control over individual body parts without requiring ground-truth motion length. To relax the interdependency among body parts caused by the integration, we devise the Partial Occlusion technique, which probabilistically occludes the certain motion part information during training. In our comprehensive experiments, BiPO achieves state-of-the-art performance on the HumanML3D dataset, outperforming recent methods such as ParCo, MoMask, and BAMM in terms of FID scores and overall motion quality. Notably, BiPO excels not only in the text-to-motion generation task but also in motion editing tasks that synthesize motion based on partially generated motion sequences and textual descriptions. These results reveal the BiPO's effectiveness in advancing text-to-motion synthesis and its potential for practical applications.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Batch Augmentation with Unimodal Fine-tuning for Multimodal Fusion of Large Language Models

In this paper, we propose batch augmentation with unimodal fine-tuning for multimodal learning. We start with pre-trained unimodal models. We fine-tune the unimodal models with the application data. After that, we form a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) head that takes information from unimodal models and provides output. Finally, we train the MLP layer and unimodal parts with batch augmentation. Depending on the data, some unimodal models can be replaced by hard-coded scripts or AI agents. The unimodal training can also follow batch augmentation when the data is augmentable. We write a multimodal batch augmentation dataloader script that implements the batch augmentation for the multimodal data. We investigate the proposed method on the FPU23 ultrasound and UPMC Food-101 multimodal datasets. The multimodal large language model (LLM) with the proposed training achieves the best average result among the investigated methods across both datasets. According to our literature search, the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) accuracy of 93.29% on the UPMC Food-101 dataset, while we apply the ViT-L/16 model for vision and the GPT-2 model for text. We share the scripts of the proposed method with traditional counterparts at the following repository: github.com/dipuk0506/multimodal

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Geometry-Centered 3D Latent World Models for Growing Surfaces

Many physical systems do not merely move or deform; they grow, adding material and changing the geometry that a world model must represent. Existing world models are typically optimized for pixel prediction, reward prediction, or fixed-support physical dynamics, leaving open how to model systems whose underlying physical support expands over time and whose future morphology depends on hidden material response. We introduce FOLIAGE, a geometry-centered latent world model for growing surfaces. Within a fixed state budget, FOLIAGE represents mature regions as a compact scaffold while allocating higher-resolution state to regions predicted to drive near-future growth. This focuses representation and computation where new material and geometric change occur while retaining compact global context. FOLIAGE further separates observation, action, and privileged physics: heterogeneous RGB, point-cloud, and mesh observations are fused into a deployable geometric state; material controls condition the latent dynamics; and hidden physical energies guide training but are not required at deployment. To evaluate this setting, we introduce SURF-GARDEN and SURF-BENCH, providing controlled counterfactual branches, dense cross-modal correspondences, hidden physical signals, and stress tests for growing-geometry state learning. FOLIAGE reduces inverse-material error by $\approx40\%$ and 5-step mesh forecasting Chamfer error by $\approx30\%$ relative to strong baselines, while improving cross-modal retrieval by +14 mAP points. Stress tests show graceful degradation under sensor loss and correspondence corruption. On temporal 3D plant scans, FOLIAGE also improves passive future-geometry forecasting, while transfer experiments show that the learned geometry-centered state remains useful beyond the simulator.

cs.CV↗