arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.09267

Who Broke Me? Execution-Guided Repair of Behavioral Dependency Breaks

Juntao Chen·Tingting Bi·Yanlin Wang·Patanamon Thongtanunam
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dependency upgrades can break downstream projects without changing the library interface. Such behavioral breaking changes are difficult for developers to fix, because the failing test does not always point to the root API, the upstream API that causes the break. Existing LLM-based repair methods obtain evidence for the repair from compiler feedback or library documentation. However, a behavioral break produces no compiler feedback and is often undocumented. Agents that receive no upgrade evidence also usually do not retrieve upstream evidence themselves, and most of their failed repairs do not identify the root API. The library diff provides useful upstream evidence, but the root API must first be identified to select the relevant part of the diff. We present BBCFixer, a repair method that runs the failing test under the old and new library versions, ranks the calls whose return value differs to identify a candidate root API, and filters the library diff with that candidate. To evaluate repairs of behavioral breaks, we further introduce BBCBench, a benchmark of 100 behavioral dependency breaks in Python and JavaScript. We compare BBCFixer on BBCBench with two baselines: (1) Pure Agent, an agent that receives no upgrade evidence, and (2) BDUpdater, a method that mines library documentation. BBCFixer raises the average pass rate by up to 17% relative to Pure Agent and needs up to 27% fewer agent steps per successful repair. BBCFixer thus provides a way to select the upstream evidence behind a behavioral break, so that an LLM agent can repair behavioral breaking changes more effectively and efficiently.

Explore related subjects

cs.SE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juntao Chen, Tingting Bi, Yanlin Wang, Patanamon Thongtanunam. 2026-10-07. Who Broke Me? Execution-Guided Repair of Behavioral Dependency Breaks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09267

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

From Verification Failures to Reusable Guidance for Coding Agents

Coding agents need to establish that a program satisfies a specification and that the specification captures the requested behavior. We study how expert diagnosis of verification failures can become reusable guidance for this work. Our approach combines executable language definitions in the K framework with a kit of procedures for constructing specifications, repairing proofs, and auditing their adequacy. A human-guided development campaign on HumanEval, a benchmark of 164 Python programming tasks, achieves a 164/164 success rate with the semantics and the kit, measured by final AI audit Pass verdicts after two targeted repairs. To examine whether auditing detects problems that successful proofs leave unresolved, we construct 12 author-reviewed pairs of clean and defective packages. Every package passes its K proofs, and completed audits identify all defects and accept all clean packages. We then use KleverBench to test specification and proof construction for 31 programs with changed operator meanings. Comparisons with complete acceptance rules and equally long generic advice yield mixed results across two model and budget settings, motivating further work on selecting useful guidance within resource limits. Human-reviewed Optimism proofs establish expected pause reverts for six operations within declared input bounds under London semantics with unbounded gas. We report progress, difficulties, and lessons toward agents that deliver programs with checkable correctness arguments.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

PreMaQ: Predicting Maintainability-Related Quality of LLM-Generated Code Before Generation

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable of code generation, adopting generated code in software development requires assessing not only its functional correctness but also its maintainability-related quality. If such quality could be estimated before generation, developers could avoid the cost of generating, reviewing, and discarding low-quality code. Although prior work has shown that the functional correctness of the LLM-generated code can be predicted in advance, it remains unclear whether maintainability-related quality is similarly predictable. We introduce Pre-Generation Maintainability-Related Quality Prediction (PreMaQ), which predicts the Code Smell Score (CSS) and Maintainability Index (MI) of generated code from the internal representations of LLMs before generation. Our evaluation covers four open-weight LLMs and four Python code generation benchmarks, comprising 2,695 tasks in total. Our results show that predicted CSS and MI consistently correlate with their observed values across all 16 model-benchmark combinations, achieving mean Spearman rank correlations of 0.57 and 0.65, respectively. When used for model selection, PreMaQ achieves 59.5% of the maintainability-related quality improvement attainable by an ideal maintainability-based selector over random selection on tasks for which multiple models generate functionally correct code. Combining predictions from PreMaQ and prompt embeddings increases this proportion to 60.7%, indicating that the two signals are complementary. These findings suggest that PreMaQ can be used to predict and improve the maintainability-related quality of LLM-generated code.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

RAPO-Sol: Retrieval-Augmented Preference Optimization for Repository-Level Solidity Code Generation

Smart contracts written in Solidity manage assets, permissions, and irreversible state changes, making code generation both useful and security-critical. Repository-level Solidity generation is challenging because models must synthesize complete contracts or libraries while preserving consistency across state variables, modifiers, events, inheritance, external calls, and access-control logic. We present RAPO-Sol, a two-stage training framework for repository-level Solidity code generation. First, Retrieval-Augmented Fine-Tuning (RAFT) augments each training input with similar Solidity examples, helping the model learn recurring contract-level patterns while remaining retrieval-free at inference time. Second, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) trains the model to prefer reference contracts over close but semantically flawed alternatives. We construct rejected samples using Solidity Semantic-Anchor Perturbation (SAP), which perturbs validation statements, visibility modifiers, data-location keywords, context variables, payment operations, and low-level calls. Experiments on SolidityBench with CodeLlama-7B-Instruct, DeepSeek-Coder-6.7B-Instruct, and Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct show that RAFT consistently improves over supervised fine-tuning, while SAP-based DPO provides further gains in BLEU and SolidityScore. The full RAFT+DPO pipeline achieves the best performance across all three models, demonstrating complementary benefits from retrieval during training and Solidity-aware preference optimization without adding retrieval cost at inference.

cs.SE↗