arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.09262

Reading Position Is the Baseline to Beat: A Time-Ordered Evaluation of Personalised Highlight Prediction

Kazuki Nakayashiki·Keisuke Watanabe
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A reader's first highlights on a page are the cheapest personal signal a reading product has. The natural plan is to suggest what similar earlier readers marked, and to judge the result against popularity. We argue that the baseline to beat is reading position. In a time-ordered evaluation on one social highlighting platform (7,343 reader-page pairs on 1,511 pages after one highlight), ranking the sentences just below a reader's first highlight, with no other reader's data, puts the next highlight in the top five 47% of the time, against 26% for popularity and 29% for the better of two similarity methods. The baseline depends on the target: over all later highlights that ranking loses to popularity, while popularity discounted by distance from the latest highlight, at the scale with the best average precision of three tried, beats popularity and both similarity methods on both targets. In a comparison specified in advance, neither similarity method shows a gain over popularity in average precision over all later highlights, from one to five highlights, and a gain of +0.01 is excluded. Nor would a gain by itself show that a method has found a reader's preferences: synthetic readers who share one set of preferences produce one, and an evaluation out of time order shows a method where the reader went. The position results are exploratory and unconfirmed. Personalisation inside a document should be evaluated in time order and against reading position.

Explore related subjects

cs.IRcs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kazuki Nakayashiki, Keisuke Watanabe. 2026-10-07. Reading Position Is the Baseline to Beat: A Time-Ordered Evaluation of Personalised Highlight Prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09262

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Listwise Explanation of Embedding-Based Rankings via Semantic Chunk Grouping

Dense embedding rankers score documents through contextual sentence- and passage-level representations, yet listwise explanation methods often attribute rankings to isolated words. We study this mismatch and introduce ChunkGroupSHAP, a listwise Shapley method that clusters semantically related chunks across documents into shared features, preserving contextual evidence while bounding the KernelSHAP regression dimension by the group count. Across MS MARCO, FinanceBench, AILACaseDocs, and FinQA with E5-family rankers and BM25, raw chunks improve rank-reconstruction Fidelity over RankSHAP's word features in all 11 dense-ranker settings. The best chunk-group configuration further improves on raw chunks in eight of these settings, with the incremental benefit depending on grouping scope; word features remain strongest in three of four BM25 settings. These results show that explanation units should match the ranking model: contextual chunks better suit dense bi-encoders, whereas words remain effective for BM25. ChunkGroupSHAP supports listwise attribution over contextual evidence through a bounded feature space shared across documents.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Self-Indexing Attention for Compression-Compatible Sparse Long-Context LLM Inference

Sparse long-context inference requires efficient token retrieval in both prefill and decode. Existing methods often use different retrieval strategies for the two stages, preventing one retrieval representation from being reused throughout inference. We propose Self-Indexing Attention, a training-free framework built on a shared transform-domain sign-magnitude representation. The key signs provide a reusable token-level index for grouped prefill selection and decode retrieval, while the same representation remains compatible with external KV-cache compression without separate indexer metadata. This 1-bit index enables efficient retrieval through bitwise operations widely supported by modern accelerators. At 5% attention density, Self-Indexing Attention remains close to dense attention on LongBench and RULER and achieves up to 6.1x prefill and 10.3x decode attention-operator speedups. Experiments with TurboQuant and DeepSeekV4-Flash further demonstrate compatibility with low-bit KV-cache compression and pretrained sparse-attention indexers.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

From Chunks to Functional Evidence: Function-Aware Retrieval for EDA Documentation QA

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely used to ground answers in documents. For complex technical documentation, however, the primary bottleneck is often not model reasoning but a mismatch between a query and the way knowledge is organized for retrieval. This mismatch is pronounced in Electronic Design Automation (EDA) documentation, where the information needed for an answer is scattered across heterogeneous yet tightly coupled artifacts. We therefore redesign the basic retrieval unit of RAG. Instead of operating on isolated chunks or binary relations, we collect typed artifacts into EDA functional units. Each unit is recorded as a hyperedge with links to its source chunks. We then train an encoder to align queries with functional units and combine unit retrieval with direct chunk retrieval. After mapping the selected units back to their sources, a unified reranker chooses the evidence given to the generator. On the newly constructed EDADocEval-QA dataset, our method improves ROUGE-L by 37.1% over Chunk RAG and 55.6% over the strongest graph baseline. On the public ORD-MMBench benchmark, it improves ROUGE-L by 30.0% over the strongest baseline. These results support function-aware evidence organization in the evaluated EDA documentation settings.

cs.IR↗