Distinguishable Category Groupings in Complex Surveys: Which Categories Can the Design Tell Apart?

Jiarui Qi; Yinhai Wang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.09259

Distinguishable Category Groupings in Complex Surveys: Which Categories Can the Design Tell Apart?

Jiarui Qi·Yinhai Wang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Surveys often estimate the share of cases in each of several categories, such as the causes of an event or the reasons for a visit. Readers then compare the categories, but reliability rules usually check each estimate alone, not the differences between them. We ask instead which groups of categories can be told apart under the sampling design. The categories often fall into blocks, such as driver-related and vehicle-related causes. A grouping is called distinguishable when every pair of its groups in the same block differs by more than the design's minimum detectable difference, computed from the primary sampling units at the design's degrees of freedom. The maximal distinguishable groupings are the most detailed and can differ in size, while merging two groups can destroy distinguishability. So even if splitting any one group in two breaks distinguishability, a more detailed distinguishable grouping may still exist. We propose two methods. One merges categories until the grouping is distinguishable, then tests every single split. The other lists every distinguishable grouping of a block with few categories. When groups in different blocks must also differ, there might be no grouping that qualifies. An application to the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey, with 24 primary sampling units in 12 strata, gives the grouping maxima for two blocks of its categories. Of more than 27 million groupings of its 13 vehicle-related critical reasons, none with more than four groups is distinguishable, and its environment-related reasons resolve into at most four groups. Merging two groups of a distinguishable vehicle grouping destroys distinguishability in 5,239 of 31,773 cases. If groups from different blocks must also be told apart, no grouping qualifies. Analysts can apply these methods before publishing categorical comparisons from designs with few degrees of freedom.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Jiarui Qi, Yinhai Wang. 2026-10-07. Distinguishable Category Groupings in Complex Surveys: Which Categories Can the Design Tell Apart?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09259

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Robust Bayesian methods using amortized simulation-based inference

Bayesian simulation-based inference (SBI) methods are used in statistical models where simulation is feasible but the likelihood is intractable. Standard SBI methods can perform poorly in cases of model misspecification, and there has been much recent work on modified SBI approaches which are robust to misspecified likelihoods. However, less attention has been given to the issue of inappropriate prior specification, which is the focus of this work. In conventional Bayesian modelling, there will often be a wide range of prior distributions consistent with limited prior knowledge expressed by an expert. Choosing a single prior can lead to an inappropriate choice, possibly conflicting with the likelihood information. Robust Bayesian methods, where a class of priors is considered instead of a single prior, can address this issue. For each density in the prior class, a posterior can be computed, and the range of the resulting inferences is informative about posterior sensitivity to the prior imprecision. We consider density ratio classes for the prior and implement robust Bayesian SBI using amortized neural methods developed recently in the literature. We also discuss methods for checking for conflict between a density ratio class of priors and the likelihood, and sequential updating methods for examining conflict between different groups of summary statistics. The methods are illustrated for several simulated and real examples.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

On the permutation equivariance principle for causal estimands

In many causal inference problems, multiple action variables share a common causal role yet lack a natural ordering. \revblue{We consider $K\geq2$ action variables, each evaluated under treatment or control conditions,} and formalize permutation equivariance, the principle that permuting the variables permutes the corresponding estimands in a trackable manner, hence preserving their scientific meaning. We characterize this principle algebraically and present a complete class of weighted permutation equivariant estimands capturing main effects and interactions of all orders. We discuss the interpretation and choice of weights and characterize residual-free estimands, whose inclusion--exclusion sum recovers the endpoint contrast between the all-treated and all-control configurations. \revblue{Applying our general framework to network interference yields a new hierarchy of direct, indirect, and overall effects, whose first-order aggregates recover the average effects of \citet{hu2022average}. We also identify the overall effects as mixed derivatives of expected welfare under independent Bernoulli assignment.} We illustrate the framework through the contexts of factorial studies, causal mediation, and network interference.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Continuous mixtures of Gaussian processes as models for spatial extremes

Spatial modelling of extreme values allows studying the risk of joint occurrence of extreme events at different locations and is of significant interest in climatic and other environmental sciences. A popular class of dependence models for spatial extremes is that of random location-scale mixtures, in which a spatial "baseline" process is multiplied or shifted by a random variable, potentially altering its extremal dependence behaviour. Gaussian location-scale mixtures retain benefits of their Gaussian baseline processes while overcoming some of their limitations, such as symmetry, light tails and weak tail dependence. We review properties of Gaussian location-scale mixtures and develop novel constructions with interesting features, together with a general algorithm for conditional simulation from these models. We leverage their flexibility to propose extended extreme-value models, that allow for appropriately modelling not only the tails but also the bulk of the data. This is important in many applications and avoids the need to explicitly select the events considered as extreme. We propose new solutions for likelihood inference in parametric models of Gaussian location-scale mixtures, in order to avoid the numerical bottleneck given by the latent location and scale variables that can lead to high computational cost of standard likelihood evaluations. The effectiveness of the models and of the inference methods is confirmed with simulated data examples, and we present an application to wildfire-related weather variables in Portugal. Although not detailed here, the approaches would also be straightforward to use for modelling multivariate (non spatial) data.

stat.ME↗