arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.09170

Beyond Reconstruction: What Matters in Action Tokenization for Robot Policies?

Abstract

Autoregressive action-token policies such as vision-language-action models require action tokenizers to translate discrete token sequences into precise control actions in continuous space. Many action tokenizers learn the mapping between tokens and actions via a reconstruction objective. However, as we show through extensive analysis, sufficiently accurate action reconstruction is only one part of what makes a downstream robot policy successful. It is also critical that the policy is able to predict the right tokens for new observations, and that unseen policy token predictions still decode into reasonable actions. These properties are downstream of tokenizer training and are not directly incentivized by a reconstruction objective alone. In this work, we introduce Predictable and Robust Action Tokenization (ProAct), a tokenizer training method that strategically augments reconstruction with the goal of improving downstream predictability and robustness. ProAct is policy-agnostic and uses only action datasets for training. Across the Robomimic, LIBERO, and RoboTwin benchmarks and a diverse set of tokenizer architectures, ProAct improves rollout success by an average of 11.3 percentage points. These improvements also translate to vision-language-action policies and real-world robotic manipulation, yielding average gains of 21.8 and 36.7 percentage points, respectively. These results suggest that effective action tokenization should be designed as a policy interface that balances fidelity, predictability, and robustness, rather than as a reconstruction problem alone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Haoran Chen, Jingtian Ji, Samuel Wheeler, Kaylene Caswell Stocking, Matthew Walter. 2026-10-06. Beyond Reconstruction: What Matters in Action Tokenization for Robot Policies?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09170

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

RoboFAC: A Comprehensive Framework for Robotic Failure Analysis and Correction

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have recently advanced robotic manipulation by translating natural-language instructions and visual observations into control actions. However, existing VLAs are primarily trained on successful expert demonstrations and lack structured supervision for failure diagnosis and recovery, limiting robustness in open-world scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose the Robotic Failure Analysis and Correction (RoboFAC) framework. We construct a large-scale failure-centric dataset comprising 9,440 erroneous manipulation trajectories and 78,623 QA pairs across 53 scenes in both simulation and real-world environments, with systematically categorized failure types. Leveraging this dataset, we develop a lightweight multimodal model specialized for task understanding, failure analysis, and failure correction, enabling efficient local deployment while remaining competitive with large proprietary models. Experimental results demonstrate that RoboFAC achieves a 34.1% higher failure analysis accuracy compared to GPT-4o. Furthermore, we integrated RoboFAC as an external supervisor in a real-world VLA control pipeline, yielding a 29.1% relative improvement across four tasks while significantly reducing latency relative to GPT-4o. These results demonstrate that RoboFAC enables systematic failure diagnosis and recovery, significantly enhancing VLA recovery capabilities. Our model and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/MINT-SJTU/RoboFAC.

cs.RO↗

Agentic Scene Policies

Designing or learning robot policies that generalize zero-shot across a range of language instructions and objects is a core problem in robotics. Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) learn such policies end-to-end by repurposing existing Vision-Language Models (VLMs), but generalization to new instructions and objects remains challenging. An alternative is to implement a modular policy by leveraging an explicit VLM-based 3D scene representation and motion planning. While modular policies show strong zero-shot potential, they typically retrieve objects based on semantics without explicit spatial reasoning, severely restricting their overall grounding capabilities. They also interact with objects using basic grasping and navigation skills. In this work, we address these limitations by unifying grounding capabilities and robot skills in a single agentic action space through a scene-agent tool interface. By leveraging part-level affordances, our skills generalize across diverse objects and enable zero-shot interactions such as unplugging chargers and opening drawers. We name the resulting framework Agentic Scene Policies (ASP). Through extensive real-world experiments, we show how ASP consistently outperforms leading VLAs in the zero-shot setting. We also demonstrate the extensibility of our framework by introducing a mobile version of ASP to tackle room-level queries. See our project page (https://montrealrobotics.ca/agentic-scene-policies.github.io/) for more results.

cs.RO↗

RoboPilot: Generalizable Dynamic Robotic Manipulation with Dual-thinking Modes

Despite rapid progress in robotics, complex or long-horizon tasks remain a fundamental challenge. Most current approaches follow an open-loop paradigm with limited reasoning and no feedback, resulting in poor robustness to environmental changes and severe error accumulation. We present RoboPilot, a dual-thinking closed-loop agentic framework for robotic manipulation that supports adaptive reasoning for complex tasks in real-world dynamic environments. RoboPilot leverages primitive actions for structured task planning and flexible action generation as a agentic system, while introducing feedback to enable replanning from dynamic changes and execution errors. Chain-of-Thought reasoning further enhances high-level task planning and guides low-level action generation. The agentic system dynamically switches between fast and slow thinking to balance efficiency and accuracy. To systematically evaluate the robustness of RoboPilot in diverse robot manipulation scenarios, we introduce RoboPilot-Bench, a benchmark spanning 21 tasks across 10 categories, including infeasible-task recognition and dynamic recovery. Experiments show that RoboPilot outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 11% in task success rate, and the real-world deployment on an industrial robot further demonstrates its robustness.

cs.RO↗