Are Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning Methods Really Different?

Yikuan Li; Pinyan Lu; Fanghui Liu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.09122

Are Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning Methods Really Different?

Yikuan Li·Pinyan Lu·Fanghui Liu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) offers many parameterizations, yet their methodological and functional differences remain unclear. We compare six methods in language and diffusion models to examine how their parameterizations relate to task performance, forgetting, and changes in pretrained weight geometry. Motivated by the spectrum-preserving design of orthogonal fine-tuning (OFT), we first ask whether spectral preservation is itself important for adaptation and retention. We find that the selected LoRA-family methods also approximately preserve pretrained geometry, and that restoring their slightly drifted singular-value spectra largely preserves task performance, questioning the necessity of explicit geometric preservation. Beyond this, we observe that some methods exhibit distinct adaptation--retention trade-offs that vary across settings: LoRA most consistently limits forgetting at competitive performance, DoRA achieves higher mean task scores than LoRA in most comparisons, while PiSSA often incurs greater retention costs. Further intervention experiments suggest that while performance gains from different PEFT methods can be attributed to modifications in different groups of spectral components, we consistently find that restoring dominant rather than intermediate or trailing components produces the largest mean reduction in general-text NLL or base-image drift. Together, these results motivate evaluating geometric constraints through their functional consequences rather than preservation alone. Code is available at https://github.com/Kuaaannn/PEFT_methods.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yikuan Li, Pinyan Lu, Fanghui Liu. 2026-10-06. Are Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning Methods Really Different?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09122

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Learning in the Recurrent State: Gradient Descent with Linear Recurrent Networks

In-context learning lets a sequence model adapt to a new task from examples in its input. A prominent line of work shows how self-attention can be constructed to implement gradient descent on a linear predictor fit to the in-context examples during the forward pass. State-space models (SSMs) and other linear recurrent networks (LRNNs) model sequences at linear time cost, but it is unclear how their recurrent update could carry out the same in-context gradient descent. We introduce Gradient-based Recurrent In-context Learner (GRIL), a diagonal LRNN that factorizes a supervised gradient step into a short-window cross-product write and a multiplicative readout of the next query. For linear regression, this construction accumulates the context gradient in a matrix state and applies it in a single forward pass, with $O(f^2)$ learned degrees of freedom. The same design extends to multi-step updates and cross-entropy classification, with a limited MLP-based extension to non-linear regression. We show empirically that trained GRILs recover the behavior and parameters analytically predicted by the construction on synthetic ICL tasks. Furthermore, the same architecture can be extended and trained on general-purpose benchmarks, including Long Range Arena, language modeling and associative recall. Together, these results establish windowed cross-product self-attention as a concrete inductive bias that lets LRNNs learn in context through gradient-descent-like updates, while remaining trainable on general-purpose tasks.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

LLaTA: Unlocking Graph Structure Learning with Tree-Guided Large Language Models

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has popularized text-attributed graphs (TAGs), creating an urgent need for graph structure learning (GSL) methods that effectively leverage textual information. However, existing GSL approaches are designed for traditional graphs without text, and adapting them to LLMs faces two challenges: defining a suitable optimization objective given LLMs' massive parameters, and designing an efficient architecture without costly fine-tuning. To address these, we propose LLaTA (Large Language and Tree Assistant), which reformulates GSL as a tree optimization framework---shifting from training edge predictors to designing a language-aware tree sampler. LLaTA constructs structural encoding trees via entropy minimization to capture topology, then leverages tree-guided LLM in-context learning to integrate textual semantics without fine-tuning. Extensive experiments on 11 datasets demonstrate LLaTA's flexibility with any backbone, superior scalability over LLM-based GSL methods, and state-of-the-art effectiveness across diverse domains.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Causal Posterior Estimation

We present Causal Posterior Estimation (CPE), a novel method for Bayesian inference in simulator models, where evaluating the likelihood function is intractable or computationally expensive, but generating outputs given parameter values is straightforward. CPE approximates the posterior distribution using flow matching while directly incorporating the conditional dependence structure induced by the model's graphical representation into the neural network architecture. Across extensive experiments, we demonstrate that hard-coding these conditional dependencies into the network, rather than requiring them to be learned from data, enables CPE to achieve highly accurate posterior inference that matches or outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

cs.LG↗