arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.08946

MarketRank: ranking stocks by the stationary probabilities of a Markov chain over estimated money flows, with a topological landscape view

Abstract

Every trading day, money leaves some stocks and moves into others. MarketRank asks where that money concentrates and how the concentration shifts over time. It treats the market as a Markov chain whose states are stocks. The chance of moving from one stock to another is the share of the first stock's outgoing dollars that goes to the second, and a stock's MarketRank score is its long run (stationary) probability in that chain, computed by damped power iteration on a sparse transition matrix. PageRank ranks web pages with the same idea, using links instead of dollars. Who sold what to buy what is not public, so the flows are estimated from daily prices and volumes with a correlation tilted gravity model, in a deterministic parallel C++ engine. On a universe of 10K US stocks and ETFs, the ranking is led by the large semiconductor and technology names, and estimated flows stay within a sector more often than chance. The level of the score, however, does not predict next day returns: it shows where money sits, not where prices go next. A 3D landscape view, Fluxscape, turns the ranking into terrain: Louvain communities of the recent flow graph, reclustered on every bar, become territories, ordered by recursive spectral bisection along a generalized Hilbert curve, interpolated by inverse distance weighting, smoothed by a centroidal Voronoi style relaxation with portfolio holdings pinned to their exact values, and rendered as a Gouraud shaded mesh. The surface is for reading trends; the exact ranked table remains the reference. The practical question is whether MarketRank can improve real portfolio moves, and we answer it with tests fixed in this study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B. Kaan Karamete. 2026-10-06. MarketRank: ranking stocks by the stationary probabilities of a Markov chain over estimated money flows, with a topological landscape view. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08946

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Procedural Generation of Conceptual 3D Ship Internal Arrangements for Design-Space Exploration

Ship internal arrangement is a complex spatial design problem in which competing functions within a fixed volume affect spatial relationships, mass distribution, trim, and stability. Exploring these trade-offs requires many layouts in a common format, yet public general-arrangement drawings are scarce, inconsistent, and two-dimensional. This study develops a common framework for generating conceptual 3D internal arrangements across six vessel families: bulk carriers, tankers, container vessels, offshore support vessels, patrol vessels, and yachts. Each arrangement uses paired voxel grids and topological graphs for spatial and connectivity analysis. The framework is evaluated through three experiments: (i) comparison of 50,000 generated arrangements with 23 reconstructed real references, (ii) envelope-constrained reconstruction of one reference per family, and (iii) response of generated layouts to requested function volumes. Generated design spaces broadly align with references within each family's sampling range. Searching alternative spatial subdivisions improves reconstruction across all families, with voxel accuracy reaching 75.5%. Fuel and ballast allocations respond near-proportionally to requested volume, while other functions depend on subdivision capacity, compartment eligibility, and discrete assignment. A fixed-hull offshore support vessel application shows that the same hull and requested programme can produce different adjacency and trim outcomes, with five nondominated concepts among 119 of 500 alternatives meeting stability and programme criteria. The results support layout design-space exploration across vessel families and changing requirements, with spatial organisation remaining important beyond volume compliance. The generator and conceptual general arrangement dataset are released publicly for reproducible analysis, benchmarking, and learning-based design studies.

cs.CE↗

Dexy: A Simple Stablecoin Design Based on an Algorithmic Central Bank

We consider a new algorithmic stablecoin called Dexy consisting of three components: a central bank, a secondary market in the form of a customized CP-AMM liquidity pool, and a trusted oracle. The price of the stablecoin in the liquidity pool is stabilized, relative to the oracle price, via central bank interventions. Users mint Dexy stablecoins from the bank using basecoins, the base cryptocurrency asset.

cs.CE↗

Vibe Building

Automated building design must comply with seismic and wind codes and satisfy structural mechanics constraints, yet most existing agents produce visually plausible models without verification grounded in mechanical analysis and code compliance. We introduce the Vibe Building task and propose PE-Loop (Physics-Engine-in-the-Loop), an agent in which a deterministic physics engine is the sole source of evaluation signals, mapping code constraints to a physics process reward, while the language model is confined to proposing discrete revisions (section menu, topology, and lateral system). Designs are verified by held-out seismic and wind time-history checks and a constructability gate. On VB-Bench, 3,577 physics-adjudicated building instances across six code families, PE-Loop achieves the highest verified success rate under three of four backbone LLMs, the highest held-out seismic pass rate under all four, and the highest held-out wind pass rate under three. Replacing the physics verdict with a language-model judge, all else fixed, leaves 58.43% of accepted designs noncompliant. These results suggest that reliable structural design rests less on a stronger LLM proposer than on an adjudicator the proposer cannot influence, a division of labor for agents whose outputs must hold up in the physical world.

cs.CE↗