arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.08896

Psychological Safety in Software Engineering Teams: A Systematic Mapping Study of Team Processes and Performance

Adnan Manzoor·Muhammad Azeem Akbar·Jussi Kasurinen·Muhammad Hamza·Aakash Ahmad·Abdul Razzaq
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Context: Psychological safety is an important human and behavioral factor in software development teams, supporting collaboration, knowledge sharing, interpersonal risk-taking, and learning. However, evidence in software engineering remains fragmented across team processes, performance outcomes, contextual conditions, barriers. Objective: This study maps literature on psychological safety in software engineering, examining its conceptualization, associations with team performance and processes, contextual influences, barriers, and strengthening strategies. Method: We conducted a systematic mapping study following established software engineering guidelines. We analyzed 112 primary studies published between 2006 and June 2026 using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis across six research questions. Results: Psychological safety emerges as a multidimensional, context-dependent, team-level construct characterized by interpersonal risk-taking, open communication, collaboration, learning, trust, and supportive interaction. It is predominantly associated with productivity, software quality, innovation, team satisfaction, collaboration, communication, and decision-making. These relationships are shaped by leadership, organizational culture, work environment, trust, and sociocultural and individual conditions. Recurring barriers include communication problems, organizational constraints, leadership issues, diversity and inclusion challenges, and workload pressures. Although diverse practices are reported, evidence of their effectiveness and long-term sustainability remains limited. Conclusion: Psychological safety is a multidimensional, context-dependent team-level construct associated with team interaction and performance. This study highlights the need for longitudinal, context-sensitive research on psychological safety interventions in software development environments.

Explore related subjects

cs.SE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adnan Manzoor, Muhammad Azeem Akbar, Jussi Kasurinen, Muhammad Hamza, Aakash Ahmad, Abdul Razzaq. 2026-10-06. Psychological Safety in Software Engineering Teams: A Systematic Mapping Study of Team Processes and Performance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08896

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

From Verification Failures to Reusable Guidance for Coding Agents

Coding agents need to establish that a program satisfies a specification and that the specification captures the requested behavior. We study how expert diagnosis of verification failures can become reusable guidance for this work. Our approach combines executable language definitions in the K framework with a kit of procedures for constructing specifications, repairing proofs, and auditing their adequacy. A human-guided development campaign on HumanEval, a benchmark of 164 Python programming tasks, achieves a 164/164 success rate with the semantics and the kit, measured by final AI audit Pass verdicts after two targeted repairs. To examine whether auditing detects problems that successful proofs leave unresolved, we construct 12 author-reviewed pairs of clean and defective packages. Every package passes its K proofs, and completed audits identify all defects and accept all clean packages. We then use KleverBench to test specification and proof construction for 31 programs with changed operator meanings. Comparisons with complete acceptance rules and equally long generic advice yield mixed results across two model and budget settings, motivating further work on selecting useful guidance within resource limits. Human-reviewed Optimism proofs establish expected pause reverts for six operations within declared input bounds under London semantics with unbounded gas. We report progress, difficulties, and lessons toward agents that deliver programs with checkable correctness arguments.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

PreMaQ: Predicting Maintainability-Related Quality of LLM-Generated Code Before Generation

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable of code generation, adopting generated code in software development requires assessing not only its functional correctness but also its maintainability-related quality. If such quality could be estimated before generation, developers could avoid the cost of generating, reviewing, and discarding low-quality code. Although prior work has shown that the functional correctness of the LLM-generated code can be predicted in advance, it remains unclear whether maintainability-related quality is similarly predictable. We introduce Pre-Generation Maintainability-Related Quality Prediction (PreMaQ), which predicts the Code Smell Score (CSS) and Maintainability Index (MI) of generated code from the internal representations of LLMs before generation. Our evaluation covers four open-weight LLMs and four Python code generation benchmarks, comprising 2,695 tasks in total. Our results show that predicted CSS and MI consistently correlate with their observed values across all 16 model-benchmark combinations, achieving mean Spearman rank correlations of 0.57 and 0.65, respectively. When used for model selection, PreMaQ achieves 59.5% of the maintainability-related quality improvement attainable by an ideal maintainability-based selector over random selection on tasks for which multiple models generate functionally correct code. Combining predictions from PreMaQ and prompt embeddings increases this proportion to 60.7%, indicating that the two signals are complementary. These findings suggest that PreMaQ can be used to predict and improve the maintainability-related quality of LLM-generated code.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

RAPO-Sol: Retrieval-Augmented Preference Optimization for Repository-Level Solidity Code Generation

Smart contracts written in Solidity manage assets, permissions, and irreversible state changes, making code generation both useful and security-critical. Repository-level Solidity generation is challenging because models must synthesize complete contracts or libraries while preserving consistency across state variables, modifiers, events, inheritance, external calls, and access-control logic. We present RAPO-Sol, a two-stage training framework for repository-level Solidity code generation. First, Retrieval-Augmented Fine-Tuning (RAFT) augments each training input with similar Solidity examples, helping the model learn recurring contract-level patterns while remaining retrieval-free at inference time. Second, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) trains the model to prefer reference contracts over close but semantically flawed alternatives. We construct rejected samples using Solidity Semantic-Anchor Perturbation (SAP), which perturbs validation statements, visibility modifiers, data-location keywords, context variables, payment operations, and low-level calls. Experiments on SolidityBench with CodeLlama-7B-Instruct, DeepSeek-Coder-6.7B-Instruct, and Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct show that RAFT consistently improves over supervised fine-tuning, while SAP-based DPO provides further gains in BLEU and SolidityScore. The full RAFT+DPO pipeline achieves the best performance across all three models, demonstrating complementary benefits from retrieval during training and Solidity-aware preference optimization without adding retrieval cost at inference.

cs.SE↗