Transferability and operational reliability of a Prithvi crop classification foundation model under phenological and geographic shift across three continents

Venkatesh Kolluru; Rajat Shinde; Abdelhak Marouane; Caden Helbling; Deepak Shah; Othneil Drew; Srinivas Kolluru; Iksha Gurung; Manil Maskey; Rahul Ramachandran

arXiv · 2610.08810

Transferability and operational reliability of a Prithvi crop classification foundation model under phenological and geographic shift across three continents

Venkatesh Kolluru·Rajat Shinde·Abdelhak Marouane·Caden Helbling·Deepak Shah·Othneil Drew·Srinivas Kolluru·Iksha Gurung·Manil Maskey·Rahul Ramachandran

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Fine-tuned geospatial foundation models (GeoFMs) pretrained on large satellite archives have been shown to improve crop classification accuracy and geographic transferability. However, their operational performance beyond the training distribution remains poorly characterized. We evaluated the out-of-distribution performance of a widely adopted GeoFM [Prithvi-EO-2.0] across 37 events in 12 countries on three continents and validated against regional reference products. Results indicated that the mean overall accuracy (OA) declined from 0.65 in the United States to 0.40 in Europe. Beyond accuracy metrics, we assessed five key aspects of model performance: whether model confidence indicates signal failure, sensitivity to observation windows, the effect of coarsening class schemes, and robustness to both band loss and cloud- and shadow-contamination. Accuracy collapsed when the observation window misaligned with local crop phenology, while deterministic confidence remained high. Expected calibration error increased for seven of eight paired events, and 12-51% of each affected scene was confidently mislabeled at near-zero precision. Monte Carlo dropout entropy registered the shift in all eight, indicating that much of the apparent cross-continent decline reflected phenological misalignment rather than spatial transfer. Two adjustments recovered accuracy without retraining. Consolidating 13 classes into 10, based on the model's dominant confusions, raised the mean OA by 8.4 percentage points. Compressing the window toward near-real-time use preserved accuracy across a 45- to 90-day plateau, peaking near 75 days, though arms tighter than 30 days fell about 0.11 below that plateau. Fine-tuned crop GeoFMs therefore transfer usefully only where observation windows match local growing seasons. We translate these findings into operational guidance for the reliable deployment of the released model.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Venkatesh Kolluru, Rajat Shinde, Abdelhak Marouane, Caden Helbling, Deepak Shah, Othneil Drew, Srinivas Kolluru, Iksha Gurung, Manil Maskey, Rahul Ramachandran. 2026-09-20. Transferability and operational reliability of a Prithvi crop classification foundation model under phenological and geographic shift across three continents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08810

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Modified Loss of Momentum Gradient Descent: Fine-Grained Analysis

We analyze gradient descent with Polyak (1964) heavy-ball momentum (HB) whose fixed momentum hyperparameter $β\in (0, 1)$ provides exponential decay of memory. Building on Kovachki and Stuart (2021), we prove that on an exponentially attractive invariant manifold the algorithm is exactly plain gradient descent with a modified loss, provided that the step size $h$ is small enough. Although the modified loss does not admit a closed-form expression, we describe it up to $O(h^{\mathcal{R}})$-errors for arbitrary finite order $\mathcal{R}$, and prove global (finite "time" horizon) trajectory approximation bounds $O(h^{\mathcal{R}})$. We then conduct a fine-grained analysis of the combinatorics underlying the memoryless approximations of HB, in particular, finding a rich family of polynomials in $β$ hidden inside which include and lie coefficient-wise in between Eulerian and Narayana polynomials. We prove that these polynomials are $h$-polynomials of certain graph-associahedra. As corollaries of the main results, we derive continuous modified equations of arbitrary finite approximation order (with rigorous bounds) and the principal flow that approximates the HB dynamics, generalizing Rosca et al. (2023). Approximation theorems cover both full-batch and mini-batch HB. The results shed new light on the main features of HB and outline a roadmap for similar analysis of other optimization algorithms.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

HomID : Benchmarking Intrinsic Dimension Estimators on Homogenous Manifolds with Anisotropic Embeddings

The manifold hypothesis suggests that data lies on manifolds with smaller intrinsic dimension (ID) than their ambient dimension. However there is no empirical agreement on the estimates for ID from different estimators for realistic datasets. Thus it is important to test ID estimators (IDEs) with targeted stressors. In this work, we consider the role of anisotropy. To this end, we propose HomID, a collection of homogeneous spaces with anisotropic embedding, for benchmarking ID estimators. We observe that methods that perform well on standard benchmarks systematically degrade on HomID under identical resource allocation. We further observe that anisotropic distortion of such benchmarks also results in performance degradation. Finally, we demonstrate that controlled anisotropic distortions induce systematic shifts in the distributions on which these methods rely, providing a concrete mechanism for the resulting estimation errors in two particular IDEs.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Routing-Aware Safety Alignment for Mixture-of-Experts Models

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models introduce unique challenges for safety alignment due to their sparse routing mechanisms, which can enable degenerate optimization behaviors under standard full-parameter fine-tuning. In our preliminary experiments, we observe that naively applying full-parameter safety fine-tuning to MoE models can reduce attack success rates through routing or expert dominance effects, rather than by directly repairing Safety-Critical Experts. To address this challenge, we propose RASA, a routing-aware expert-level alignment framework that explicitly repairs Safety-Critical Experts while preventing routing-based bypasses. RASA identifies experts disproportionately activated by successful jailbreaks, selectively fine-tunes only these experts under fixed routing, and subsequently enforces routing consistency with safety-aligned contexts. Across two representative MoE architectures and a diverse set of jailbreak attacks, RASA achieves near-perfect robustness, strong cross-attack generalization, and substantially reduced over-refusal, while preserving general capabilities on benchmarks such as MMLU, GSM8K, and TruthfulQA. Our results suggest that robust MoE safety alignment benefits from targeted expert repair rather than global parameter updates, offering a practical and architecture-preserving alternative to prior approaches.

cs.LG↗