arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.08785

Conformal Prediction Sets Quantify Information Gain: A Theoretical Perspective

Kevin Zhang·Stephen Bates
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Conformal prediction is a popular tool for uncertainty quantification that outputs prediction sets with finite-sample coverage guarantees. While prediction set size is commonly used as a heuristic measure of uncertainty, the information-theoretic basis for this interpretation remains poorly understood. In this work, we provide such a foundation using a decision-theoretic generalization of entropy tailored to set-valued prediction. In particular, we introduce a family of generalized information measures based on the size and coverage of conformal prediction sets. Notably, Shannon mutual information admits an exact integral representation in terms of these measures. We then show that, in standard classification settings, the reduction in conformal set size from additional information (i) is sandwiched between calibration-dependent members of this family and (ii) obeys a data processing inequality, both up to finite-sample calibration and model error terms. Together, our results formally relate conformal prediction to classical information-theoretic quantities and justify using set-size reduction as an information gain metric. Empirically, we validate our theory across 11 classification settings and show that set-size reduction and Shannon mutual information can rank features differently in a greedy feature selection experiment.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kevin Zhang, Stephen Bates. 2026-10-06. Conformal Prediction Sets Quantify Information Gain: A Theoretical Perspective. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08785

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Modified Loss of Momentum Gradient Descent: Fine-Grained Analysis

We analyze gradient descent with Polyak (1964) heavy-ball momentum (HB) whose fixed momentum hyperparameter $β\in (0, 1)$ provides exponential decay of memory. Building on Kovachki and Stuart (2021), we prove that on an exponentially attractive invariant manifold the algorithm is exactly plain gradient descent with a modified loss, provided that the step size $h$ is small enough. Although the modified loss does not admit a closed-form expression, we describe it up to $O(h^{\mathcal{R}})$-errors for arbitrary finite order $\mathcal{R}$, and prove global (finite "time" horizon) trajectory approximation bounds $O(h^{\mathcal{R}})$. We then conduct a fine-grained analysis of the combinatorics underlying the memoryless approximations of HB, in particular, finding a rich family of polynomials in $β$ hidden inside which include and lie coefficient-wise in between Eulerian and Narayana polynomials. We prove that these polynomials are $h$-polynomials of certain graph-associahedra. As corollaries of the main results, we derive continuous modified equations of arbitrary finite approximation order (with rigorous bounds) and the principal flow that approximates the HB dynamics, generalizing Rosca et al. (2023). Approximation theorems cover both full-batch and mini-batch HB. The results shed new light on the main features of HB and outline a roadmap for similar analysis of other optimization algorithms.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

HomID : Benchmarking Intrinsic Dimension Estimators on Homogenous Manifolds with Anisotropic Embeddings

The manifold hypothesis suggests that data lies on manifolds with smaller intrinsic dimension (ID) than their ambient dimension. However there is no empirical agreement on the estimates for ID from different estimators for realistic datasets. Thus it is important to test ID estimators (IDEs) with targeted stressors. In this work, we consider the role of anisotropy. To this end, we propose HomID, a collection of homogeneous spaces with anisotropic embedding, for benchmarking ID estimators. We observe that methods that perform well on standard benchmarks systematically degrade on HomID under identical resource allocation. We further observe that anisotropic distortion of such benchmarks also results in performance degradation. Finally, we demonstrate that controlled anisotropic distortions induce systematic shifts in the distributions on which these methods rely, providing a concrete mechanism for the resulting estimation errors in two particular IDEs.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Routing-Aware Safety Alignment for Mixture-of-Experts Models

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models introduce unique challenges for safety alignment due to their sparse routing mechanisms, which can enable degenerate optimization behaviors under standard full-parameter fine-tuning. In our preliminary experiments, we observe that naively applying full-parameter safety fine-tuning to MoE models can reduce attack success rates through routing or expert dominance effects, rather than by directly repairing Safety-Critical Experts. To address this challenge, we propose RASA, a routing-aware expert-level alignment framework that explicitly repairs Safety-Critical Experts while preventing routing-based bypasses. RASA identifies experts disproportionately activated by successful jailbreaks, selectively fine-tunes only these experts under fixed routing, and subsequently enforces routing consistency with safety-aligned contexts. Across two representative MoE architectures and a diverse set of jailbreak attacks, RASA achieves near-perfect robustness, strong cross-attack generalization, and substantially reduced over-refusal, while preserving general capabilities on benchmarks such as MMLU, GSM8K, and TruthfulQA. Our results suggest that robust MoE safety alignment benefits from targeted expert repair rather than global parameter updates, offering a practical and architecture-preserving alternative to prior approaches.

cs.LG↗