arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.08670

Principled Under Pressure: Post-Training Decides Whether LLMs Act on Their Own Moral Judgment

Abstract

Language models increasingly act as agents. An agent that says an action is wrong and then takes it anyway is a different failure from one that does not know better, and evaluations of stated values cannot see it. We build a pre-registered panel of 248 scenarios across five kinds of pressure. Each scenario is posed twice to the same model, once as the agent choosing what to do and once in the third person asking which option is right, so the model's own judgment is the reference. Every scenario has a twin with the pressure removed, and every model gets a positive control in which its operator orders the violating action, so that a missing gap can be told apart from a blind instrument. On OLMo-3-7B-Instruct, the model takes the action it judged wrong on about one in five pressuring scenarios, more often than on the same scenarios with the pressure removed. Across four instruct models the gap depends on the post-training recipe: OLMo-3 and Meta's Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct carry it; Tulu 3 shows none on the whole panel (above about 0.01 in probability) or on its own most-pressuring scenarios; Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct shows none on the whole panel (above about 0.02) and is unresolved on its own (0.083, -0.028 to 0.195). Meta's recipe and Ai2's Tulu 3 start from the same Llama-3.1 weights, and only Meta's carries the gap. Reading a chat model outside its chat template reverses the sign of its gap with nothing at stake (-0.038 against +0.055 under the template on OLMo-3), a distortion present on two of three recipes. On both models that carry it, reasoning about the stakes before acting moves the choice back toward the model's own judgment, against a same-length non-moral task, with or without the pressure; on OLMo-3, naming the norm at stake does about a third of that. The gap is a measurable target for post-training recipes, not a fixed property of pretrained weights.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Orion Reblitz-Richardson. 2026-10-06. Principled Under Pressure: Post-Training Decides Whether LLMs Act on Their Own Moral Judgment. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08670

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in the Recurrent State: Gradient Descent with Linear Recurrent Networks

In-context learning lets a sequence model adapt to a new task from examples in its input. A prominent line of work shows how self-attention can be constructed to implement gradient descent on a linear predictor fit to the in-context examples during the forward pass. State-space models (SSMs) and other linear recurrent networks (LRNNs) model sequences at linear time cost, but it is unclear how their recurrent update could carry out the same in-context gradient descent. We introduce Gradient-based Recurrent In-context Learner (GRIL), a diagonal LRNN that factorizes a supervised gradient step into a short-window cross-product write and a multiplicative readout of the next query. For linear regression, this construction accumulates the context gradient in a matrix state and applies it in a single forward pass, with $O(f^2)$ learned degrees of freedom. The same design extends to multi-step updates and cross-entropy classification, with a limited MLP-based extension to non-linear regression. We show empirically that trained GRILs recover the behavior and parameters analytically predicted by the construction on synthetic ICL tasks. Furthermore, the same architecture can be extended and trained on general-purpose benchmarks, including Long Range Arena, language modeling and associative recall. Together, these results establish windowed cross-product self-attention as a concrete inductive bias that lets LRNNs learn in context through gradient-descent-like updates, while remaining trainable on general-purpose tasks.

cs.LG↗

LLaTA: Unlocking Graph Structure Learning with Tree-Guided Large Language Models

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has popularized text-attributed graphs (TAGs), creating an urgent need for graph structure learning (GSL) methods that effectively leverage textual information. However, existing GSL approaches are designed for traditional graphs without text, and adapting them to LLMs faces two challenges: defining a suitable optimization objective given LLMs' massive parameters, and designing an efficient architecture without costly fine-tuning. To address these, we propose LLaTA (Large Language and Tree Assistant), which reformulates GSL as a tree optimization framework---shifting from training edge predictors to designing a language-aware tree sampler. LLaTA constructs structural encoding trees via entropy minimization to capture topology, then leverages tree-guided LLM in-context learning to integrate textual semantics without fine-tuning. Extensive experiments on 11 datasets demonstrate LLaTA's flexibility with any backbone, superior scalability over LLM-based GSL methods, and state-of-the-art effectiveness across diverse domains.

cs.LG↗

Causal Posterior Estimation

We present Causal Posterior Estimation (CPE), a novel method for Bayesian inference in simulator models, where evaluating the likelihood function is intractable or computationally expensive, but generating outputs given parameter values is straightforward. CPE approximates the posterior distribution using flow matching while directly incorporating the conditional dependence structure induced by the model's graphical representation into the neural network architecture. Across extensive experiments, we demonstrate that hard-coding these conditional dependencies into the network, rather than requiring them to be learned from data, enables CPE to achieve highly accurate posterior inference that matches or outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

cs.LG↗