arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.08542

Space Diplomacy Toward a Legal Regime for Space Resource Activities on the Moon

Abstract

The development of national policy and legal outputs toward space resource utilization across several countries accelerated after the introduction of the Artemis Accords in 2020. The announcement also further intensified the debate about the necessity of specifying a regime for using space resources on the international level. In 2021 the Legal Subcommittee of the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space finally approved the establishment of its Working Group on Legal Aspects of Space Resource Activities. Therefore, this chapter builds on diplomacy under conditions of polycentric governance and aims to map the diversity of actors' ideas and interests about governance for space resource utilization on the level of the Working Group. The research process follows qualitative analysis methodology and assigns the results into the matrix of prospective alternatives for governing space resources. The available materials of the Working Group including reports and recordings, constitute the core empirical data used in the analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nancy Riordan, Miloslav Machoň, Lucia Kozák Csajková. 2026-10-06. Space Diplomacy Toward a Legal Regime for Space Resource Activities on the Moon. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-8864-0_7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Hidden Geometry of Global Aid: How Money Moves Through 10 Million Transactions

International aid is usually described as flows between countries, hiding the organisations money passes through. We reconstruct global aid's organisational network from 10.9 million International Aid Transparency Initiative records, tracing over one million payments worth about US\$1 trillion between 22,773 organisations. First, centrality, measured as how far a funder's money can travel downstream, is not size. Relative to their number of partners, giant bilateral donors (USAID, UK FCDO) are only as central as expected, while the most central positions belong to foundations (Gates, Hewlett), research organisations (ODI, University of Oxford) and delivery contractors (Mott MacDonald). Second, principal component analysis of eleven flow measures separates organisations along three lines: whether they mainly give or receive, how much money flows in, and how reliant they are on few partners. Humanitarian organisations emerge from the flows alone, tending to handle larger inflows. Third, almost all organisations form one connected network, yet money moves down long, one-way chains. Among five comparison networks, aid most resembles international banking, with a few large hubs feeding many small players, but has far fewer loops and is more strictly top-down. This suggests a system with little redundancy, where losing a major funder or intermediary could cut off organisations downstream, a pressing question after recent donor cuts.

physics.soc-ph↗

Beyond expressiveness in pairwise and higher-order models

The debate over pairwise and higher-order models is often framed as a contest of expressive power. This framing is misleading. A graph with arbitrary multivariate node functions can reproduce the node-level dynamics of many hypergraph models, but the hypergraph's grouping information does not thereby disappear: it may simply move from the structure to the rule. We separate four notions frequently conflated here: structural representation, functional representability, statistical identifiability, and mechanistic adequacy. We then prove that interaction order, the number of variables that must act jointly in some term of any additive decomposition of a node's update, is the same in every exact representation: no change of structural language can lower it. As a description-length problem, at the unrestricted algorithmic level a fixed compiler redistributes information between structure and rule at constant overhead, so expressiveness alone cannot privilege either language. Preferences arise only relative to explicit model classes, code families, and data. This yields an operational minimum-description-length criterion combining structural cost, conditional rule cost, and imperfect fit. Within it, for $M$ disjoint groups of size $k$, the clique projection's edge list is asymptotically $k-1$ times longer than the hyperedge list it replaces: the projection encodes the same grouping at higher cost. Examples from diffusion, Boolean dynamics, ecology, and ambiguous projections give graph-preferred, hypergraph-preferred, and unresolved cases; for bipartite and multilayer lifts, cost, fit, and identifiability tie, and the choice turns on which entities are posited as primitive. The position is symmetric: higher-order structure should not be inferred from phenomenology alone, nor does a graph's ability to emulate a system make it the most parsimonious or adequate description.

physics.soc-ph↗

Who Waits the Longest? Unequal Paths to Legal Stability among Migrants and Refugees

Legal systems shape not only the recognition of migrants and refugees but also the pace and stability of their integration. Refugees often shift between multiple legal classifications, a process we refer to as the "legal journey". This journey is frequently prolonged and uncertain. Using a network-based approach, we analyze legal transitions for over 350,000 migrants in Austria (2022-2024). EU nationals such as Germans reach stable residence in under four months; refugees from conflict-affected regions face far longer and more uncertain journeys, ranging from two months for Ukrainians to nine months for Syrians and 20 months for Afghans. Refugee women, especially from Syria and Afghanistan, are more likely to gain protection. Afghan women reach stability in 14 months on average, less than half the 30 months Afghan men wait. We also find that those who cross the border without going through official border controls face higher exit rates and lower chances of securing a stable status. We show that legal integration is not a uniform process, but one structured by institutional design, entry mode, and unequal timelines.

physics.soc-ph↗