arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.08279

Whose Face Is It Anyway? A Multi-Model Audit of Facial Affect Recognition on Children, and Why the Gap Is the Head, Not the Features

Tobias Hallmen·Robin-Nico Kampa·Elisabeth André
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Facial affect models are trained almost entirely on adults, yet are increasingly applied to children in education, health, and developmental research. We present a controlled, multi-model audit of five AffectNet-pretrained expression models (EmoNet, EmotiEffLib, DDAMFN++, OpenFace 3.0, LibreFace) on children, across four child image datasets, the AffectNet-8 validation set, and two spontaneous child video datasets, through one shared harness. Three findings emerge. First, the child gap is model-agnostic: every architecture degrades from posed to naturalistic faces and shares the fear$\rightarrow$surprise confusion. Second, it is concentrated and corroborated across all five models: open-mouth faces (read as surprise, correlating with the AU26 jaw drop) and South-Asian children degrade systematically, with a smaller averted-gaze penalty, while closed-mouth faces, White and Black children, and direct gaze do not; the bias tracks expression morphology and specific populations, not skin tone. Third, the gap is diagnosable: a linear probe on frozen features reaches 0.75-0.91 on unseen children versus 0.48-0.66 zero-shot, so it lies largely in the classifier head, not the representation, whereas dimensional valence/arousal regression degrades sharply under domain shift. Building on this, recalibrating only the head on a little target data recovers $+0.13$ to $+0.28$ on the two largest child sets across all five models at negligible adult cost, though the gain is in-distribution and does not transfer across child collections. We will release the harness, per-sample predictions, and analysis code; the child face data stays license-locked and is never redistributed.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tobias Hallmen, Robin-Nico Kampa, Elisabeth André. 2026-10-06. Whose Face Is It Anyway? A Multi-Model Audit of Facial Affect Recognition on Children, and Why the Gap Is the Head, Not the Features. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08279

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Large Pretraining Datasets Don't Guarantee Robustness after Fine-Tuning in Image Classification

Large-scale pretrained models are widely leveraged as foundations for learning new specialized tasks via fine-tuning, with the goal of maintaining the general performance of the model while allowing it to gain new skills. A valuable goal for all such models is robustness: the ability to perform well on out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks. We assess whether fine-tuning preserves the overall robustness of the pretrained model in image classification, and observed that models pretrained on large datasets exhibited strong catastrophic forgetting and loss of OOD generalization. To systematically assess robustness preservation in fine-tuned models, we propose the Robustness Inheritance Benchmark (ImageNet-RIB). The benchmark, which can be applied to any pretrained model, consists of a set of related but distinct OOD (downstream) tasks and involves fine-tuning on one of the OOD tasks in the set then testing on the rest. We find that though continual learning methods help, fine-tuning reduces robustness across pretrained models. Surprisingly, models pretrained on the largest and most diverse datasets (e.g., LAION-2B) exhibit both larger robustness losses and lower absolute robustness after fine-tuning on small datasets, relative to models pretrained on smaller datasets. We observe this collapse in contrastively pretrained (CLIP) models and their fine-tuned variants, where it grows with pretraining scale; the supervised models we test do not exhibit it. These findings suggest that starting with the strongest foundation model is not necessarily the best approach for performance on specialist tasks. https://jd730.github.io/projects/ImageNet-RIB

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Feature Space Analysis by Guided Diffusion Model

This paper aims to analyse the feature space of a vision-related Deep Neural Network (DNN) by proposing a decoder that can generate an image whose feature closely matches a user-specified feature. Supported by quantitative evidence of its high feature-matching accuracy, our decoder facilitates precise analysis of the DNN's feature space. Our decoder is implemented as a guided diffusion model that guides the image generation of a pre-trained diffusion model to minimise the Euclidean distance between the feature of a clean image estimated at each step and the user-specified feature. The key advantages of our decoder are its training-free applicability to analyse the feature spaces of different DNNs and its practical feasibility on a single COTS GPU. The experiments targeting CLIP's image encoder and ResNet-50 demonstrate the effectiveness of our decoder both as a feature-matching image generator and as a visual feature space analyser. The codes and data are available at https://github.com/ccilab-doshisha/FeatDec

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Scaling Laws for Deepfake Detection

This paper presents a systematic study of scaling laws for the deepfake detection task. Specifically, we analyze the model performance against the number of real image domains, deepfake generation methods, and training images. Since no existing dataset meets the scale requirements for this research, we construct ScaleDF, the largest dataset to date in this field, which contains over 5.8 million real images from 51 different datasets (domains) and more than 8.8 million fake images generated by 102 deepfake methods. Using ScaleDF, we observe power-law scaling similar to that shown in large language models (LLMs). Specifically, the average detection error follows a predictable power-law decay as either the number of real domains or the number of deepfake methods increases. This key observation not only allows us to forecast the number of additional real domains or deepfake methods required to reach a target performance, but also inspires us to counter the evolving deepfake technology in a data-centric manner. Beyond this, we examine the role of pre-training and data augmentations in deepfake detection under scaling, as well as the limitations of scaling itself.The ScaleDF dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/WenhaoWang/ScaleDF.

cs.CV↗