arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.08017

Scope-Restricted Backtracking Counterfactuals

Johan de Aguas·Martin Jullum
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Interventional counterfactuals evaluate statements such as "had $A$ been $a$" by replacing the assignment for $A$ while keeping the unit's exogenous background fixed. Backtracking counterfactuals reverse this logic: they preserve the structural assignments and instead vary background conditions across worlds. This semantics is natural for diagnostic explanation, but full backtracking may be too permissive because every exogenous coordinate can vary. We introduce scope-restricted backtracking counterfactuals, in which the modeler specifies which coordinates may vary while the remainder are shared across worlds. The scope determines the admissible carriers of the contrast, while a cross-world kernel governs the plausibility of their alternative values. We present model-based inference for general scope-restricted backtracking counterfactuals, derive sharp marginal bounds for a specified explanatory query, and establish frontier and compatibility conditions under which this explanatory query admits a modified-value policy representation. A linear-Gaussian example distinguishes local-noise, ancestor, irrelevant-noise, and infeasible explanations across scopes, while an application to the UCI Adult benchmark illustrates kernel specification, sensitivity, and how much of the explanation is carried by the cross-world coupling itself.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Johan de Aguas, Martin Jullum. 2026-10-06. Scope-Restricted Backtracking Counterfactuals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Robust Bayesian methods using amortized simulation-based inference

Bayesian simulation-based inference (SBI) methods are used in statistical models where simulation is feasible but the likelihood is intractable. Standard SBI methods can perform poorly in cases of model misspecification, and there has been much recent work on modified SBI approaches which are robust to misspecified likelihoods. However, less attention has been given to the issue of inappropriate prior specification, which is the focus of this work. In conventional Bayesian modelling, there will often be a wide range of prior distributions consistent with limited prior knowledge expressed by an expert. Choosing a single prior can lead to an inappropriate choice, possibly conflicting with the likelihood information. Robust Bayesian methods, where a class of priors is considered instead of a single prior, can address this issue. For each density in the prior class, a posterior can be computed, and the range of the resulting inferences is informative about posterior sensitivity to the prior imprecision. We consider density ratio classes for the prior and implement robust Bayesian SBI using amortized neural methods developed recently in the literature. We also discuss methods for checking for conflict between a density ratio class of priors and the likelihood, and sequential updating methods for examining conflict between different groups of summary statistics. The methods are illustrated for several simulated and real examples.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

On the permutation equivariance principle for causal estimands

In many causal inference problems, multiple action variables share a common causal role yet lack a natural ordering. \revblue{We consider $K\geq2$ action variables, each evaluated under treatment or control conditions,} and formalize permutation equivariance, the principle that permuting the variables permutes the corresponding estimands in a trackable manner, hence preserving their scientific meaning. We characterize this principle algebraically and present a complete class of weighted permutation equivariant estimands capturing main effects and interactions of all orders. We discuss the interpretation and choice of weights and characterize residual-free estimands, whose inclusion--exclusion sum recovers the endpoint contrast between the all-treated and all-control configurations. \revblue{Applying our general framework to network interference yields a new hierarchy of direct, indirect, and overall effects, whose first-order aggregates recover the average effects of \citet{hu2022average}. We also identify the overall effects as mixed derivatives of expected welfare under independent Bernoulli assignment.} We illustrate the framework through the contexts of factorial studies, causal mediation, and network interference.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Testing the Deviation of a High-dimensional Mean

This paper investigates the high-dimensional one-sample equivalence testing problem for a reference mean vector $\bbmu_0$: $H_0:\|\bbmu-\bbmu_0\|>d_0$ versus $H_1: \|\bbmu-\bbmu_0\|\leq d_0$ for a pre-specified length threshold $d_0 > 0$. In high-dimensional regimes, classical equivalence tests suffer from severe asymptotic breakdowns. To resolve this difficulty, we propose a novel test statistic based on a two-armed bandit (TAB) U-process, which leverages positive/negative feedback mechanisms from control theory. We rigorously establish the weak convergence of TAB U-process to a novel two-dimensional stochastic differential equation (SDE), termed the U-bandit SDE. By employing in-depth analysis of this SDE, we characterize the asymptotic size and power of the resulting test statistic. The theoretical framework is extended to the two-sample setting and validated through finite-sample simulations and an empirical analysis of microbiome compositions.

stat.ME↗