arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.07755

Trustworthy Method Comparison with AI Judges: Estimation and Design under Order, Batch, and Aggregation Effects

Tianxi Li·Jie Ding
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges for automated AI evaluation. A common practice is to randomize prompt sequences and average the resulting scores, but its statistical validity remains unclear. We show that LLM evaluation mechanisms can be approximated by a class of Markov generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), supported by out-of-sample predictions across three major commercial LLMs. Using a first-order Markov GLMM, we study leaderboard ranking and group comparison. For leaderboard ranking, randomize-and-average selection is consistent under a mild separation condition, and a Williams square design can improve efficiency when item qualities are close. For group comparison, naive averaging can yield inconsistent conclusions about differences in group-level quality because of the response model's nonlinearity. Empirical results further support the validity of the proposed model-based inference beyond the first-order theory, including settings with higher-order sequence memory. We illustrate the approach in an application where AI judges compare two graphical model estimation methods.

Explore related subjects

stat.MLcs.LGstat.APstat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tianxi Li, Jie Ding. 2026-10-06. Trustworthy Method Comparison with AI Judges: Estimation and Design under Order, Batch, and Aggregation Effects. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07755

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identifiability Analysis of Linear ODE Systems with Hidden Confounders

The identifiability analysis of linear Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) systems is a necessary prerequisite for making reliable causal inferences about these systems. While identifiability has been well studied in scenarios where the system is fully observable, the conditions for identifiability remain unexplored when latent variables interact with the system. This paper aims to address this gap by presenting a systematic analysis of identifiability in linear ODE systems incorporating hidden confounders. Specifically, we investigate two cases of such systems. In the first case, latent confounders exhibit no causal relationships, yet their evolution adheres to specific functional forms, such as polynomial functions of time $t$. Subsequently, we extend this analysis to encompass scenarios where hidden confounders exhibit causal dependencies, with the causal structure of latent variables described by a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). The second case represents a more intricate variation of the first case, prompting a more comprehensive identifiability analysis. Accordingly, we conduct detailed identifiability analyses of the second system under various observation conditions, including both continuous and discrete observations from single or multiple trajectories. To validate our theoretical results, we perform a series of simulations, which support and substantiate our findings.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Improving Mixup Calibration with Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization

In many real-world applications, ensuring the robustness and stability of deep neural networks (DNNs) is crucial, particularly for image classification tasks that encounter various input perturbations. While Mixup-based data augmentation techniques have been widely adopted to enhance the resilience of trained models against such perturbations, our experiments reveal an important corruption robustness-calibration trade-off: stronger Mixup-based augmentation can improve robustness against corrupted data while substantially increasing expected calibration error (ECE). To address this challenge, we introduce DRO-Augment, a framework that integrates Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization (W-DRO) with various Mixup-based data augmentation strategies to mitigate this trade-off. Our method substantially reduces ECE under strong Mixup-based augmentation while largely preserving corruption accuracy across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, CIFAR-10-C, and CIFAR-100-C. On the theoretical side, we establish novel generalization error bounds for neural networks trained using a variation-regularized loss function with augmented data, closely related to the W-DRO problem. Furthermore, we introduce a refined CIFAR-C benchmark that corrects inconsistencies in corruption intensities, providing a more reliable evaluation for future robustness research.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Computationally efficient goodness-of-fit tests through kernelized Stein discrepancy

Models with intractable normalizing constants are widely used in statistics and machine learning. Assessing the adequacy of such models poses significant challenges: obtaining samples from the fitted model often requires sophisticated sampling algorithms. Moreover, model fitting sometimes requires iterative numerical optimization, making bootstrap procedures that require repeated refitting computationally expensive. In this paper, we leverage the kernel-based testing framework to develop a general semiparametric goodness-of-fit test based on the kernelized Stein discrepancy. We establish the consistency and the asymptotic null distribution of the test statistic under general nuisance estimation. To produce a level-$α$ test, we propose a novel influence-adjusted wild bootstrap that requires neither refitting the model nor sampling from it. We prove the consistency of the proposed bootstrap test procedure under the null and the alternative, and characterize its limiting power under contiguous local alternatives. Across simulations ranging from classical normality testing to models with intractable likelihoods, the proposed test delivers competitive or superior power at a computational cost orders of magnitude lower than that of existing approaches. We illustrate the method by assessing the adequacy of a protein signaling network model for reverse-phase protein array data from lung adenocarcinoma tumors. As a complementary insight, we show that the SKSD test can be regarded as a nonparametric score test under exponentially tilted models, connecting score-based and distance-based goodness-of-fit testing.

stat.ML↗