arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.07330

On weak commutativity between $n$ isomorphic groups, $n \geq 2$

Abstract

The Weak Commutativity Group was defined by the first author in the early 1980's as $ χ(H) = \langle H, H^ψ\mid [h,h^ψ] = 1, \ \forall h \in H \rangle $ where $H$ and $H^ψ$ are isomorphic groups under an isomorphism $ψ$, and proved that $χ(-)$, seen as a group operator, preserved the classes of solvable groups, finite groups, finite $p$-groups, and perfect groups. The list has grown considerably since then (see references). It is clear that the iterated operator $χ^n (-)$ also preserves the same classes. However, we observe that for $n \geq 2$ many of the $2^n$ $H$-generating copies of $χ^n (H)$ fail to weakly commute among themselves. We introduce in this paper the "$n$-ary Weak Commutativity Group" generated by $n$ copies of $H$ which weakly commute among themselves; that is $ χ_n (H) = \langle H, H^ψ, \dots, H^{ψ_{n-1}} \mid [h^{ψ_i}, h^{ψ_j}] = 1, \ \forall h \in H, \ 0 \leq i < j \leq n-1 \rangle $ (by definition, $H^{ψ_0} = H, H^{ψ_1} = H^ψ$). We study quotients of $χ^n (H)$ which are also simultaneously quotients of $χ_{2^n} (H)$; we refer to them as Hybrid $χ^n (H)$ - $χ_{2^n} (H)$ groups. For $n=2$ we determine the largest common quotient $Q(H)$ of $χ^2(H)$ and $χ_4(H)$, that is, the largest hybrid $χ^2(H)$-$χ_4(H)$ group. A related class of groups in our study is $χ(n,H)$, a quotient of $χ_n(H)$, previously introduced by the third named author in his 2007 doctoral thesis. We prove that this class of groups continues to preserve finiteness, nilpotency and perfectness, and we provide detailed information about their structure. In contrast, $χ_n(H)$ behaves differently: $χ_3(C_2 \times C_2)$ is infinite, while $χ_3(C_{p^t} \times C_{p^u})$ is finite for $p$ odd.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Said N. Sidki, Noraí R. Rocco, Ricardo N. de Oliveira, Dmytro Savchuk. 2026-10-05. On weak commutativity between $n$ isomorphic groups, $n \geq 2$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07330

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Left and right zero subsemigroups and an elementary approach to the Rees-Sushkevich Theorem

In a semigroup $S$ with idempotent $e$, the set of all elements $a$ of $S$ such that $ae=a$ and $ea=e$ forms the maximum left zero subsemigroup of $S$ containing $e$, and the set of all elements $b$ of $S$ such that $be=e$ and $eb=b$ forms the maximum right zero subsemigroup of $S$ containing $e$. We use these maximal right and left zero subsemigroups along with the maximal subgroups of a semigroup in the determination of maximal right and left subgroups, rectangular band subsemigroups, completely simple subsemigroups, rectangular subgroups, and completely $0$-simple subsemigroups. An elementary approach of the Rees-Sushkevich Theorem follows. Then we define rectangular $0$-bands and rectangular $0$-groups as completely $0$-simple analogues of rectangular bands and rectangular groups.

math.GR↗

Common overlattices in trees and trees with fins

Bass and Kulkarni proved that any pair of free uniform lattices in the automorphism group of a tree have conjugates that both lie inside a third uniform lattice (which is not necessarily free). We show that this does not generalise to trees with fins. The construction of our counter-example involves working with a certain generalisation of the universal groups of Burger and Mozes.

math.GR↗